IIM  Vol.3 No.1 , January 2011
ERP Software Selection Processes: A Case Study inthe Metal Transformation Sector
Abstract: When a firm decides to implement ERP softwares, the resulting consequences can pervade all levels, includ- ing organization, process, control and available information. Therefore, the first decision to be made is which ERP solution must be adopted from a wide range of offers and vendors. To this end, this paper describes a methodology based on multi-criteria factors that directly affects the process to help managers make this de- cision. This methodology has been applied to a medium-size company in the Spanish metal transformation sector which is interested in updating its IT capabilities in order to obtain greater control of and better infor- mation about business, thus achieving a competitive advantage. The paper proposes a decision matrix which takes into account all critical factors in ERP selection.
Cite this paper: nullA. Hidalgo, J. Albors and L. Gómez, "ERP Software Selection Processes: A Case Study inthe Metal Transformation Sector," Intelligent Information Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2011, pp. 1-16. doi: 10.4236/iim.2011.31001.

[1]   O. Velcu, “Strategic Alignment of ERP Implementation Stages: An Empirical Investigation,” Information and Management, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2010, pp. 158-166. doi:10.1016/

[2]   T. H. Davenport, “Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, No. 4, 1998, pp. 121-131.

[3]   T. H. Davenport, “Putting the Enterprise into the Enter- prise System,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, No. 4, 1998, pp. 121-131.

[4]   K. E. Murphy and S. J. Simon, “Intangible Benefits Valuation in ERP Projects,” Information Systems Journal, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2002, pp. 301-320. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.2002.00131.x

[5]   T. H. Davenport, “Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 2000.

[6]   T. F. Gattiker and D. L. Goodhue, “What Happens after ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Inter- Dependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Out- comes,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2005, pp. 559-585.

[7]   K. K. Hong and Y. G. Kim, “The Critical Success Factors for ERP Implementation: An Organizational Fit Perspec- tive,” Information and Management, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2002, pp. 25-40. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00134-3

[8]   T. L. Griffith, R. F. Zammuto and L. Aiman-Smith, “Why New Technologies Fail?” Industrial Management, Vol. 41, No. 3, 1999, pp. 29-34.

[9]   A. W. Scheer and F. Habermann, “Making ERP a Suc- cess,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2000, pp. 57-61. doi:10.1145/332051.332073

[10]   M. L. Markus, S. Axline, D.Petrie and C. Tanis, “Learning from Adopters’ Experiences with ERP: Problems Encoun- tered and Success Achieved,” Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2000, pp. 245-265. doi:10.1080/02683960010008944

[11]   J. Swan, S. Newell and M. Robertson, “The Illusion of ‘Best Practice’ in Information Systems for Operations Management,” European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1999, pp. 284-293. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000336

[12]   T. F. Gattiker and D. L. Goodhue, “Understanding the Local-Level Costs and Benefits of ERP through Organiza- tional Information Processing Theory,” Information and Management, Vol. 41, 2004, pp. 431-443. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00082-X

[13]   E. T. G. Wang, C. Chia-Lin, J. J. Jiang and G. Klein, “Improving Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Fit to Organizational Process Through Knowledge Transfer,” International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 27, 2008, pp. 200-212. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.02.002

[14]   N. A. Morton and Q. Hu, “Implications of the Fit between Organizational Structure and ERP: A Structural Contin-Gency Theory Perspective,” International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2008, pp. 391-402. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.01.008

[15]   C. Berchet and G. Habchi, “The Implementation and Deployment of an ERP System: An Industrial Case Study. Current Trends in ERP Implementations and Utilisation,” Computers in Industry, Vol. 56, No. 6, 2005, pp. 588-605. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2005.02.009

[16]   D. Avison and J. Malaurent, “Impact of Cultural Differ- ences: A Case Study of ERP Introduction in China,” In- ternational Journal of Information Management, Vol. 27, 2007, pp. 368-374.

[17]   R. Malhotra and C. Temponi, “Critical Decisions for ERP Integration: Small Business Issues,” International Jour- nal of Information Management, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2010, pp. 28-37. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.001

[18]   M. O. Barros, C. M. L. Werner and G. H. Travassos, “Supporting Risks in Software Project Management,” The Journal of Systems & Software, Vol. 70, No. 1-2, 2004, pp. 21-35. doi:10.1016/S0164-1212(02)00155-3

[19]   D. Gefen, “What Makes an ERP Implementation Rela- tionship Worthwhile: Linking Trust Mechanisms and ERP Usefulness,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2004, pp. 263-288.

[20]   E. W. T. Ngai, C. C. H. Law and F. K. T. Wat, “Examin- ing the Critical Success Factors in the Adoption of Enterprise Resource Planning,” Computers in Industry, Vol. 59, 2008, pp. 548-564. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2007.12.001

[21]   European Commission, “ICT & E-Business in the Metal Products Industry,” The European e-Business Market Watch, Sector Report No. 9, Brussels, 2003.

[22]   S. Pugh, “Concept Selection: A Method that Works,” Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design, Heurista, Zürich, 1981, pp. 497-506.

[23]   T. L. Saaty, “The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” McGraw- Hill, New York, 1980.

[24]   C. C. Wei, C. F. Chien and M. J. Wang, “An AHP-Based Approach to ERP System Selection,” International Jour- nal of Production Economics, Vol. 96, 2005, pp. 47-62. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.03.004