OJE  Vol.3 No.6 , October 2013
Global environment- and space-richness ranking relationships: The effects of interaction and high-order terms of explanatory variables
Abstract: In the present study, the interplay and higher-order terms of environmental and spatial variables are considered to evaluate the relations of environment and space-species richness rankings at global scale. Three taxonomic groups composed of mammals, birds and amphibians were analyzed for the study. Thek-means clustering method was introduced for richness rankings detection and analysis from published digital maps; and simple regression analysis and AIC criteria were used for identifying mostimportant correlated explanatory variables.When comparing each single variable, I found that latitude was the most important one influencing global vertebrate richness rankings. When onlyconsidering environmental variables, I foundthat precipitation was the only predictor of vertebrate richness rankings. However, when the interaction and high-order terms of different independent variables were considered, it was found that the interaction between latitude and temperature could better explain the global bird richness ranking, while the second-power effectof latitude was the best predictor for amphibianand mammalian richness rankings, as evidenced by the AIC model selection and comparison among the regression models. In conclusion, the inclusion of high-order and interaction terms of environmental and spatial variables could offer more insights into the understanding of global species diversity patterns.
Cite this paper: Chen, Y. (2013) Global environment- and space-richness ranking relationships: The effects of interaction and high-order terms of explanatory variables. Open Journal of Ecology, 3, 389-394. doi: 10.4236/oje.2013.36044.

[1]   Qian, H. (2010) Environment-richness relationships for mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians at global and regional scales. Ecological Research, 25, 629-637.

[2]   Qian, H. and Ricklefs, R.E. (2012) Disentangling the effects of geographic distance and environmental dissimilarity on global patterns of species turnover. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 21, 341-351.

[3]   Jetz, W. and Fine, P. (2012) Global gradients in vertebrate diversity predicted by historical area-productivity dynamics and contemporary environment. PLoS Biology, 10, e1001292.

[4]   Hawkins, B.A., McCain, C.M., Davies, T.J., Buckley, L. B., Anacker, B.L., Cornell, H.V., Damschen, E.I., Grytnes, J.-A., Harrison, S., Holt, R.D., et al. (2012) Different evolutionary histories underlie congruent species richness gradients of birds and mammals. Journal of Biogeography, 39, 825-841.

[5]   Legendre, P. (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: Trouble or new paradigm? Ecology, 74, 1659-1673.

[6]   Storch, D., Keil, P. and Jetz, W. (2012) Universal species and endemic-area relationships at continental scales. Nature, 488, 79-81.

[7]   Grenyer, R., Orme, C.D.L., Jackson, S.F., Thomas, G.H., Davies, R.G., Davies, T.J., Jones, K.E., Olson, V.A., Ridgely, R.S., Rasmussen, P.C., et al. (2006) Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates. Nature, 444, 93-96.

[8]   Vieira, C., Blmires, D., Diniz-Fiho, J., Bini, L. and Rangel, T. (2008) Autoregressive modelling of species richness in the Brazilian Cerrado. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 68, 233-240.

[9]   Chen, Y. (2013) An autoregressive model for global vertebrate richness rankings: Long-distance dispersers could have stronger spatial structures. Zoological Studies, In Press.

[10]   R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria.

[11]   Qian, H., Wang, X., Wang, S. and Li, Y. (2007) Environmental determinants of amphibian and reptile species richness in China. Ecography, 30, 471-482.

[12]   Griffith, D. and Peres-Neto, P. (2006) Spatial modeling in ecology: The flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses. Ecology, 87, 2603-2613.[2603:SMIETF]2.0.CO;2

[13]   Belmaker, J. and Jetz, W. (2011) Cross-scale variation in species richness-environment associations. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20, 464-474.

[14]   Belmaker, J. and Jetz, W. (2012) Regional pools and environmental controls of vertebrate assemblages. American Naturalist, 179, 512-523.

[15]   Cooper, N., Freckleton, R.P. and Jetz, W. (2011) Phylogenetic conservatism of environmental niches in mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 2384-2391.

[16]   Kissling, W.D., Sekercioglu, C.H. and Jetz, W. (2012) Bird dietary guild richness across latitudes, environments and biogeographic regions. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 21, 328-340.

[17]   Cosacov, A., Johnson, L., Paiaro, Cocucci, A., Cordoba, F. and Sersic, A. (2012) Precipitation rather than temperature influenced the phylogeography of the endemic shurb Anarthrophyllum desideratum in the Patagonian steppe. Journal of Biogeography, 40, 168-182.

[18]   Starzomski, B.M., Parker, R.L. and Srivastava, D.S. (2008) On the relationship between regional and local species richness: A test of saturation theory. Ecology, 89, 1921-1930.

[19]   Adler, P. and Levine, J. (2007) Contrasting relationships between precipitation and species richness in space and time. Oikos, 116, 221-232.

[20]   Liberal, C.N., de Farias, A.M.I., Meiado, M.V., Filgueiras, B.K.C. and Iannuzzi, L. (2011) How habitat change and rainfall affect dung beetle diversity in Caatinga, a Brazilian semi-arid ecosystem. Journal of Insect Science, 11, 1-11.

[21]   Wang, Z., Brown, J., Tang, Z. and Fang, J. (2009) Temperature dependence, spatial scale and tree species diversity in eastern Asia and North America. PNAS, 106, 13388-13392.

[22]   Yasuhara, M., Hunt, G., Dowsett, H.J., Robinson, M.M., Stoll, D.K. and Marshall, D. (2012) Latitudinal species diversity gradient of marine zooplankton for the last three million years. Ecology Letters, 15, 1174-1179.

[23]   Tittensor, D.P., Mora, C., Jetz, W., Lotze, H.K., Ricard, D., Berghe, E. Vanden and Worm, B. (2010) Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa. Nature, 466, 1098-1011.

[24]   Simova, I., Storch, D., Keil, P., Boyle, B., Phillips, O. and Enquist, B. (2011) Global species-energy relationship in forest plots: Role of abundance, temperature and species climatic tolerances. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20, 842-856.

[25]   Brown, J., Gillooly, J., Allen, A., Savage, V. and West, G. (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology, 85, 1771-1789.

[26]   Storch, D. (2012) Biodiversity and its energetic and thermal controls. In: Sibly, R., Brown, J., and KordricBrown, A., Eds., Metabolic Ecology: A Scaling Approach, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester.

[27]   Algar, A., Kerr, J. and Currie, D. (2007) A test of metabolic theory as the mechanism underlying broad-scale species-richness gradients. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 170-178.

[28]   Hawkins, B.A., Albuquerque, F.S., Araujo, M.B., Beck, J., Bini, L.M., Cabrero-Sanudo, F.J., Castro-Parga, I., Diniz Filho, J.A.F., Ferrer-Castan, D., Field, R., et al. (2007) A global evaluation of metabolic theory as an explanation for terrestrial species richness gradients. Ecology, 88, 1877-1888.