Back
 OJEE  Vol.2 No.3 , September 2013
To Improve Energy Efficiency via Car Driving Deduction by Land Use Planning
Abstract: Urban area consumes about main percentage of used energy. Cities need basic review in land management, structure and form to minimize the use of energy which creating environmental pollution. Urban planners and designers are looking for a solution and essential agreement in urban planning and designing principles that can decrease the pollution from rapid urbanization. Travelling is essential for daily needs of most people in urban area. Issues arise when one considers the amount of necessary fossil fuels used in the majority of daily commuting for accessibility to services. It is necessary to design a city to minimize the use of energy which creating environmental pollution. Research conducted in Subang Jaya in Malaysia in 2012 finds a variable which influences on use of car, propose of use of car and commuting distance by car. However it tried to find effect of train station and density on use of car for accessibility to this services and facilities. Findings illustrate neighbourhood distance from train station influences distance to facilities and services in neighbourhoods. However it illustrates derived distance by car was affected by residential lots distance from restaurant, work place, school, park, house area per person, and car ownership.
Cite this paper: Malekizadeh, M. , Zain, M. , Ismail, A. and Hami, A. (2013) To Improve Energy Efficiency via Car Driving Deduction by Land Use Planning. Open Journal of Energy Efficiency, 2, 133-138. doi: 10.4236/ojee.2013.23017.
References

[1]   A. Kirby, “Current Research on Cities and its contribution to Urban Studies,” Cities, Vol. 29, Suppl. 1, 2012, pp. S3-S8.

[2]   A. J. Khattak and D. Rodriguez, “Travel Behavior in Neo-Traditional Neighborhood Developments: A Case Study in USA,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2005, pp. 481-500. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2005.02.009

[3]   A. M. L. Stahle and A. Karlstrom, “Place Syntax Geographic Accessibility with Axial Lines in GIS,” 5th Space Syntax Symposium Proceedings, Delft, 1 June 2005, pp. 131-144.

[4]   H. Millward and J. Spinney, “Time Use, Travel Behavior, and the Rural-Urban Continuum: Results from the Halifax STAR Project,” Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2011, pp. 51-58. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.12.005

[5]   S. Handy, X. Cao and P. Mokhtarian, “Correlation or Causality between the Built Environment and Travel Behavior? Evidence from Northern California,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2005, pp. 427-444. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2005.05.002

[6]   M. Z. Maleki, M. F. M. Zain and A. Ismail, “Variables Communalities and Dependence to Factors of Street System, Density, and Mixed Land Use in Sustainable Site Design,” Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 3, 2012, pp. 46-53. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2012.01.005

[7]   M. Iacono, K. J. Krizek and A. El-Geneidy, “Measuring Non-Motorized Accessibility: Issues, Alternatives, and Execution,” Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2010, pp. 133-140. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.02.002

[8]   G. Knaap and E. Talen, “New Urbanism and Smart Growth: A Few Words from the Academy,” International Regional Science Review, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2005, pp. 107-118. doi:10.1177/0160017604273621

[9]   Suruhanjaya Pengangkutan Awam Darat, “Greater Kuala Lumpur/Klang Valley Public Transport Master Plan,” 2011. http://spad.gov.my/images/stories/esgklkvlptmp.pdf

[10]   I. J. D. Jebasingam, “Creating the Essence of Cities: The Planning & Development of Malaysia’s New Federal Administrative Capital, Putrajaya,” 2006.

[11]   M. Neuman, “Notes on the Uses and Scope of City Planning Theory,” Planning Theory, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2005, pp. 123-145. doi:10.1177/1473095205054601

[12]   C. Webster, “The Donald Robertson Memorial Prizewinner 2003 the Nature of the Neighbourhood,” Urban Studies, Vol. 40, No. 13, 2003, pp. 2591-2612.

[13]   P. Howley, M. Scott and D. Redmond, “An Examination of Residential Preferences for Less Sustainable Housing Exploring Future Mobility among Dublin Central City Residents,” 2009. www.elsevier.com/locate/cities,

[14]   M. A. E. Saleh, 2”Learning from Tradition: The Planning of Residential Neighborhoods in a Changing World,” Habitat International, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2004, pp. 625-639. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00031-6

[15]   F. S. Chapin and E. J. Kaiser, “Urban Land Use Planning,” University of Illinois, St. Champaign, 1979.

[16]   Y. R. Jabareen, “Sustainable Urban Forms: Their Typologies, Models, and Concepts,” Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2006, pp. 38-52. doi:10.1177/0739456X05285119

[17]   C. Curtis and J. Scheurer, “Planning for Sustainable Accessibility: Developing Tools to Aid Discussion and Decision-Making,” Progress in Planning, Vol. 74, No. 2, 2010, pp. 53-106.

[18]   B. P. Y. Loo, C. Chen and E. T. H. Chan, “Rail-baSed Transit-Oriented Development: Lessons from New York City and Hong Kong,” Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 97, No. 3, 2010, pp. 202-212. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.06.002

[19]   M. Z. Maleki and M. F. M. Zain, “To Promote Future Sustainability with Integrated Design of Urban and Transportation System,” 6th Malaysian Universities Transport Research Forum Conference, School of Housing, Building & Planning University Sains, Pulau Pinang, 2011.

[20]   R. Binsacca, “Builder,” 2008. http://www.ecohomemagazine.com/news/compact-cure.aspxprinterfriendly=true 1-3.

[21]   P. Naess, “Accessibility, Activity Participation and Location of Activities: Exploring the Links between Residential Location and Travel Behaviour,” Urban Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2006, pp. 627-652. doi:10.1080/00420980500534677

[22]   J. Distasio, “Reacting to Actions: Exploring How Residents Evaluate Their Neighbourhoods,” University of Manitoba (Canada), Winnipeg, 2005.

 
 
Top