AHS  Vol.2 No.3 , September 2013
Technology as a Mode and Manifestation of Being: An Assessment of Its Applications
ABSTRACT
The objective of this paper is to demonstrate how technology’s being is revealed through its applications, which is expressive by means of the mode and manifestation of its being. The designation of technology as a mode of being refers to its nature, and the designation of technology as a manifestation of being refers to its activity as proof of technology’s being. Both mode and manifestation indicate how the being of technology is applied. Although distinguishable as two aspects of technology, both mode and manifestation are essential to revealing the essence of technology and its interplay with the world. Since human culture has a technological underpinning, the applications of technology not only reveal its metaphysics, but also indicate its importance to human culture. In addition to technology’s underlying method, these applications also pertain to the artifacts (or objects) of invention, mathematics, the consciousness of time, writing, alphabetization, science, and society.
KEYWORDS
Technology

Cite this paper
Rivers, T. (2013). Technology as a Mode and Manifestation of Being: An Assessment of Its Applications. Advances in Historical Studies, 2, 140-149. doi: 10.4236/ahs.2013.23018.
References
[1]   Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. New York: Free Press.

[2]   Barnard, A. (2011). Social anthropology and human origins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511974502

[3]   Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[4]   Benz, E. (1966). Evolution and Christian hope: Man’s concept of the future from the early fathers to Teilhard de Chardin. Frank, H. G. (Trans.). Garden City: Doubleday.

[5]   Bloch, M. (1953). The historian’s craft. Putnam, P. (Trans.). New York: Knopf.

[6]   Blumenberg, H. (1986). Lebenszeit und weltzeit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

[7]   Buchler, J. (1961). The concept of method. New York: Columbia University Press.

[8]   Carnap, R. (1983). The logicist foundations of mathematics. In P. Benacerraf, & H. Putnam (Eds.), Philosophy of mathematics: Selected readings (2nd ed., pp. 41-52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[9]   Coe, M. D., & Van Stone, M. (2001). Reading the Maya glyphs. New York: Thames & Hudson.

[10]   de Saussure, F. (1983). Course in general linguistics. Bally, C., & Sechehaye, A. (Eds.) with collaboration of Riedlinger, A., Harris, R. (Trans.). London: Duckworth.

[11]   Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[12]   Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

[13]   Gardiner, A. (1957). Egyptian grammar: Being an introduction to the study of hieroglyphs (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[14]   Griffiths, J. (1999). Pip pip: A sideways look at time. London: Flamingo.

[15]   Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and practice (abridged 4th ed.). Viertel, J. (Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.

[16]   Hazewinkel, M. (1988-1994). Encyclopaedia of mathematics. Dordrecht: Reidel.

[17]   Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. Lovitt, W. (Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.

[18]   Herodotus. (1998). The histories. Waterfield, R. (Trans.) with an introduction and notes by Dewald, C. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[19]   Honig, W. K. (1993). Numerosity as a dimension of stimulus control. In S. T. Boysen, & E. J. Capaldi (Eds.), The development of numerical competence: Animal and human models (pp. 61-86). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

[20]   Hurford, J. R. (2007). The origins of meaning: Language in the light of evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[21]   Jonas, H. (1974). Seventeenth century and after: The meaning of scientific and technological revolution. In L. E. Long (Ed.), Philosophical essays: From ancient creed to technological man (pp. 46-82). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

[22]   Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001

[23]   Lakoff, G., & Nú?ez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.

[24]   Landes, D. S. (1983). Revolution in time: Clocks and the making of the modern world. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

[25]   McGinn, R. E. (1990). Science, technology, and society. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

[26]   McNeil, I. (1990). An encyclopaedia of the history of technology. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203192115

[27]   Naveh, J. (1987). Early history of the alphabet: An introduction to West Semitic epigraphy and palaeography (2nd ed.). Jerusalem: Magnes Press.

[28]   Ogburn, W. F. (1964). On culture and social change: Selected papers. Duncan, O. D. (Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[29]   Olsen, J. K. B. (2009). Becoming through technology. In J. K. B. Olsen, E. Selinger, & S. Riis (Eds.), New waves in philosophy of technology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

[30]   Pollard, S. (1981). Peaceful conquest: The industrialization of Europe, 1760-1970. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[31]   Puech, é. (1986). Origins de l’alphabet. Revue biblique, 93, 161-213.

[32]   Rivers, T. J. (2000). The conception of time and its relationship to technology. Research in Philosophy and Technology, 19, 215-231.

[33]   Russell, B. (1956). Definition of number. In J. R. Newman (Ed.), The world of mathematics: A small library of the literature of mathematics from A’h-mose the scribe to Albert Einstein. New York: Simon & Schuster.

[34]   Stock, B. (1983). The implications of literacy: Written language and models of interpretation in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

[35]   Thompson, R. K. R. (1995). Natural and relational concepts in animals. In H. L. Roitblat, & J.-A. Meyer (Eds.), Comparative approaches to cognitive science (pp. 175-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

 
 
Top