Effective Elastic Properties of Honeycomb Core with Fiber-Reinforced Composite Cells

F. Ernesto  Penado

doi:10.4236/ojcm.2013.34009

F. Ernesto Penado^*

Abstract: Sandwich construction incorporating a honeycomb cellular core offers the attainment of structures that are very stiff and strong in bending while the weight is kept at a minimum. Generally, an aluminum or Nomex honeycomb core is used in applications requiring sandwich construction with fiber-reinforced composite facesheets. However, the use of a fiber-reinforced composite core offers the potential for even lower weight, increased stiffness and strength, low thermal distortion compatible with that of the facesheets, the absence of galvanic corrosion and the ability to readily modify the core properties to suit specialized needs. Furthermore, the material of the core itself will exhibit anisotropic material properties in this case. In order to design, analyze and optimize these structures, knowledge of the effective mechanical properties of the core is essential. In this paper, the effective three-dimensional mechanical properties of a composite hexagonal cell core are determined using a numerical method based on a finite element analysis of a representative unit cell. In particular, the geometry of the simplest repeating unit of the core as well as the appropriate loading and boundary conditions that must be applied is presented.

Keywords: Lightweight Structures; Composite Mirrors; Sandwich Construction; Hexagonal Cell Core; Effective Core Properties

Cite this paper: F. Penado, "Effective Elastic Properties of Honeycomb Core with Fiber-Reinforced Composite Cells," Open Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 3 No. 4, 2013, pp. 89-96. doi: 10.4236/ojcm.2013.34009.

References

[1] R. Atkinson, “Innovative Uses for Sandwich Constructions,” Reinforced Plastics, Vol. 41, No. 2, 1997, pp. 30-33.

[2] F. E. Penado, J. H. Clark III, J. P. Walton, R. C. Romeo and R. N. Martin, “Calculation of the Elastic Properties of a Triangular Cell Core for Lightweight Composite Mirrors,” Proceedings of SPIE: New Developments in Optomechanics, San Diego, 26-30 August 2007, pp. B1-B8.

[3] R. C. Romeo and R. N. Martin, “Progress in 1 m-Class Lightweight CFRP Composite Mirrors for the ULTRA Telescope,” Proceedings of SPIE: Optomechanical Technologies for Astronomy, Orlando, 24 May 2006, p. 62730S.

[4] J. Hohe and W. Becker, “Effective Stress-Strain Relations for Two-Dimensional Cellular Sandwich Cores: Homogenization, Material Models, and Properties,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2002, pp. 61-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.1425394

[5] S. Kelsey, R. A. Gellatly and B. W. Clark, “The Shear Modulus of Foil Honeycomb Cores: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation on Cores Used in Sandwich Construction,” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, Vol. 30, No. 10, 1958, pp. 294-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb033026

[6] G. Hoffman, “Poisson’s Ratio for Honeycomb Sandwich Cores,” Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 25, No. 8, 1958, pp. 534-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/8.7765

[7] J. Zhang and M. F. Ashby, “The Out-of-Plane Properties of Honeycombs,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 6, 1992, pp. 475-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(92)90013-7

[8] L. J. Gibson and M. F. Ashby, “Cellular Solids: Structure and properties,” Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1988.

[9] I. G. Masters and K. E. Evans, “Models for the Elastic Deformation of Honeycombs,” Composite Structures, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1996, pp. 403-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-2

[10] M. Grediac, “A Finite Element Study of the Transverse Shear in Honeycomb Cores,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 30, No. 13, 1993, pp. 1777-1788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(93)90233-W

[11] B. Kim and R. M. Christensen, “Basic Two-Dimensional Core Types for Sandwich Structures,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2000, pp. 657-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(99)00028-4

[12] R. F. Gibson, “Principles of Composite Material Mechanics,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994.

[13] C. W. Schwingshackl, G. S. Aglietti and P. R. Cunningham, “Determination of Honeycomb Material Properties: Existing Theories and an Alternative Dynamic Approach,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2006, pp. 177-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2006)19:3(177)

[14] C. C. Chamis, R. A. Aiello and P. L. N. Murthy, “Fiber Composite Sandwich Thermostructural Behavior: Computational Simulation,” Journal of Composites Technology & Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1988, pp. 93-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/CTR10135J

[15] “COSMOS/M User Guide,” Version 2.95, Structural Research and Analysis Corporation, Los Angeles, 2007.

[16] J. R. Andrews, F. E. Penado, S. T. Broome, C. C. Wilcox, S. R. Restaino, T. Martinez, S. W. Teare and F. Santiago, “Characterization of the Lightweight Telescope Developed for the NPOI,” Proceedings of SPIE: Ground-Based and Airborne Telescopes, Orlando, 24 May 2006, p. 62673Q.