This article attempts to disaggregate and explore the components of TFP growth that contribute to changes in output, scale of production, and allocative efficiency and technical efficiency of the Malaysian manufacturing sector. The total factor productivity (TFP) concept defined as total output per unit of all inputs used in the production of an industry has gained a prominent place in academia. The investigation on TFP growth is obviously useful for identifying sources of output growth in the development of an industry. The TFP growth is often interchangeably understood as the technical progress or changes in technology as the sole contributor to economic development. Nonetheless there are other factors contributing to its substance. Knowledge on these technical changes would help decision makers to realize the strengths and weaknesses that contribute to the growth and development of an industry. Alternatively this research would be more beneficial in the case of cross-industry or cross-country comparative studies in order to plan for developmental goal. In such a case a model industry or country can be chosen that exhibits special growth features.
Cite this paper
N. Mustapha, N. Hashim and R. Yacob, "Technical Components of Total Factor Productivity Growth in Malaysian Manufacturing Industry," Applied Mathematics
, Vol. 4 No. 9, 2013, pp. 1251-1259. doi: 10.4236/am.2013.49169
 D. Ricardo, “Principles of Political Economy and Taxa tion; Marc Blaug, Economic theory in Retrospect,” 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1817, pp. 91-112.
 T. Maltus, “An Essay on the Principle of Population as It Affects the Future Improvement of Society,” 1798. Printed for J. Johnson, in St. Paul’s Church-Yard 1998, Electronic Scholarly Publishing Project.
 The World Bank, “Poverty and Human Development (Part II),” World Development Report 1980, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington D.C., 1980.
 S. R. Ghosh and A. Kraay, “Measuring Growth in Total Productivity,” PREMnote No. 42, The World Bank, 2000.
 National Productivity Corporation, “Productivity Report 2003,” Ministry of International Trade and Industry Ma laysia, NPC Selangor, 2004.
 R. M. Solow, “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39, No. 3, 1957, pp. 312-320. doi:10.2307/1926047
 E. T. Dowling, “Theory and Problems of Mathematics for Economists,” Schaume’s Outline Series in Economics, McGraw-Hill, Inc., Boston, 1980.
 T. Coelli, “A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data En velopment Analysis (Computer) Program,” CEAP Work ing Paper 96/08. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Deptartment of Econometrics University of New England, Armidale, 1996.
 J. Felipe, “Total Factor Productivity Growth in East Asia: A Critical Survey,” Economics and Development Research Center EDRC Report Series No. 65, 1997.
 R. Gounder and V. Xayavong, “A Decomposition of To tal Productivity Growth in New Zealand’s Manufacturing Industries: A Stochastic Frontier Approach,” New Zea land Association of Economic Conference, Wellington, 2004.
 T. Coelli, D. S. P. Rao and G. E. Battese, “An Introduc tion to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
 R. Mahadevan, “A Frontier Approach to Measuring Total Factor Productivity Growth in Singapore’s Services Sec tor,” Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 48-58. doi:10.1108/01443580
 T. Coelli, D. S. P. Rao and G. E. Battese, “An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.