IJCCE  Vol.2 No.3 , August 2013
Economic Evaluation of the UCSRP-HP Process in IGCC Applications
ABSTRACT
With financial assistance from the US Department of Energy and the Illinois Clean Coal Institute, Gas Technology Institute (GTI) has been working with the University of California, Berkeley, for further development of their UCSRP-HP (University of California Sulfur Recovery Process-High Pressure) technology. The key focus of the UCSRP-HP technology is integrated multi-contaminant removal of hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbonyl sulfide (COS), ammonia (NH3), chlorides and heavy metals present in coal-derived syngas. The process has two major components: 1) removal of various trace components with a solvent (e.g., diethylene glycol or water) using a high-pressure scrubbing unit and 2) removal of H2S as sulfur via reaction with SO2 (in the presence of a solvent mixed a small quantity of a homogeneous catalyst) at 120?C to 150?C and at any syngas pressure. During this research, data critical to developing and evaluating UCSRP-HP technology for multi-contaminant removal from syngas derived from Illinois #6 coal were obtained. In this paper, we have presented key economic evaluations of the UCSRP-HP process, including potential integrations with other technology options for CO2 and hydrogen separations, for a nominal Illinois #6-coal-based 550-MWe Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) facility with CO2 capture and sequestration. GTI is exploring various options to demonstrate this technology in a pilot plant using actual syngas from a coal gasifier.

Cite this paper
A. Basu, A. Makkuni, S. Zhou and H. Meyer, "Economic Evaluation of the UCSRP-HP Process in IGCC Applications," International Journal of Clean Coal and Energy, Vol. 2 No. 3, 2013, pp. 25-34. doi: 10.4236/ijcce.2013.23004.
References
[1]   BP Energy Outlook 2030, Slide 10, 2011. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_
uk_english/reports_and_publications/statistical_energy_review_2008/STAGING/local_assets/2010_down
loads/2030_energy_outlook_booklet.pdf


[2]   Research and Development Solutions LLC., and Parsons Corp., “Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil
Energy Plants,” DOE/NETL-2007/1281, August 2007.

[3]   H. S. Meyer, “Development of an Integrated Multi-Contaminant Removal Process Applied to Warm Syn-
gas Cleanup for Coal-Based Advanced Gasification Systems,” Vol. 1, DOE Project # DE-FC26-05NT42458,
Reporting Period: June 2005-November 30 2010.

[4]   H. S. Meyer, “Integrated, Multi-Contaminant Removal Process for Syngas Cleanup—Phase 3,” ICCI Pro-
ject Number 10/2A-1, 2010.

[5]   A. Basu, H. S. Meyer, D. Leppin, J. Zhou and A. Makkuni, “UCSRP-A Flexible Sulfur Removal Process for
Sweetening Natural Gas,” American Institute of Chemical Engineers Spring Meeting, Houston, 1-5 April
2012. http://www.aiche-fpd.org/listing/127.pdf

[6]   http://www.rti.org/brochures/rti_adv_gasification.pdf

[7]   S. Li, D. J. Rocha, S. J. Zhou, H. S. Meyer, B. Bikson and Y. Ding. “Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Using
SuperHydrophobic, Polyether Ether Ketone, Hollow Fiber Membrane Contactors,” Journal of Membrane
Science, Vol. 430, 2013, pp. 79-86. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.001

[8]   Krishnan, G., “Fabrication and Scale-Up of Polybenzimidazole (PBI) Membrane Based System for Pre-
Combustion Based Capture of Carbon Dioxide,” 2011 NETL CO2 Capture Technology Meeting, Pittsburgh,
22-26 August 2011. http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/11/co2capture/presentations/5-
Friday/26Aug11-Krishman-SRIPBI%20Membranes%20for%20Pre-Combustion%20Captur.pdf


[9]   K. A. Berchtold, et al., “High Temperature Polymer-Based Membrane Systems for Pre-Combustion Carbon
Dioxide Capture,” NETL CO2 Capture Technical Meeting, Pittsburgh, 9-12 July 2012. http://www.netl.doe.
gov/publications/proceedings/12/co2capture/presentations/4-Thursday/K%20Berchtold-LANL-Polymer-
based%20Membrane.pdf


[10]   D. Jack, et al., “Scale-Up of Hydrogen Transport Membranes for Carbon Capture Applications,” Gasification
Technology Conference, San Francisco, 9-12 October 2011. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/
coalpower/gasification/projects/advsep/42469/40JACK.pdf


[11]   R. L. Schendel, “SO2-Generation Process Can Double Refinery Claus Unit Capacity,” The Oil and Gas
Journal, 1993, pp. 63-66.

[12]   D. Gray and J. Plunkett, “Personal Communication on Mass/Energy Balances and Cost Data for Advanced
H2 Membrane,” 2010.

[13]   K. Havens, “CO2 Transportation,” Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research, Slide 14, 2008.
https://www.purdue.edu/discoverypark/energy/assets/pdfs/cctr/presentations/Havens-CCTR-June08.pdf

[14]   S. J. Zhou, et al., “Hybrid Membrane/Absorption Process for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture,” NETL CO2
Capture Technology Meeting, Pittsburgh, 13-17 September 2010.
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/12/co2capture/presentations/1-Monday/J%20Zhou-
GTI-Hybrid% 20Membrane%20Process.pdf


[15]   DOE/NETL Report, “Current and Future Technologies for Gasification-Based Power Generation,” DOE/NETL
Report 2009/1389, Vol. 2, 2009, pp. 3-17.

[16]   DOE/NETL Report, “Current and Future Technologies: A Pathway Study Focused on Non-Carbon Capture
Advanced Power Systems R & D using Bituminous Coal,” Vol. 1, DOE NETL-2008/1337, 2008, pp. 3-18.

 
 
Top