The role of implicit and explicit negative feedback in language acquisition has been of major concern, especially in Second Language Acquisition (SLA). Research in SLA has demonstrated that implicit negative feedback such as recast and implicit expansion are potential triggers of language development and learning. Data from two experiments, using a pretest-posttest experimental control design, of two separate groups of Arabic-speaking learners of English, one at Georgetown University (GU), and the other at American University Cairo (AUC), provides some evidence that implicit negative feedback can facilitate the acquisition and development of a complex linguistic feature, i.e., English contracted question forms. An interlanguage analysis framework, A Psycholinguistic Interlanguage Analysis Framework was devised to investigate learner’s output. Interlanguage analysis findings indicate that recast can be effective in making a learner notice the contracted wh- & yes/no questions, provided that it follows a pattern known to the learner and focuses on one point only, and that the learner is linguistically ready to learn the linguistic element.
 Adams, R., Nuevo, A. M., & Egi, T. (2011). Explicit and implicit feedback, modified output, and SLA: does explicit and implicit feedback promote learning and learner-learner interactions? The Modern Lan guage Journal, 11, 42-63. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01242.x
 Anderson, J. (1983b). Four operating principles and input distribution as explanation for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viberg (Eds.), rogression and regression in language (pp. 309-339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Aquil, R. (2012a). L1 shapes L2 auditory representation: Elicited imitation of Arabic speaking learners of English International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature (IJALEL), 1, 39-63.
 DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Demetras, M. J., Post, K. N., & Snow, C. E. (1986). Feedback to first language learners: The role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of Child Language, 13, 275-292. doi:10.1017/S0305000900008059
 Doughty, C. (1998). Acquiring competence in a second language: Form and function. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages: Perspective in research and scholarship (pp. 128-156). New York: The Modern Language association of America.
 Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998b). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction and output in se cond language acquisition. In B. Vanpatten & J. Willaims (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175-199). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
 Hammarberg, B. (1993). The course of development in second language phonology acquisition: A natural path or strategic choice In K. Hyltensatan & A. Viberg (Eds.), Progression & regression in language: sociocultural, neuropsychological, and linguistic perspectives (pp. 439-463). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (SSLA), 27, 124-140. doi:10.1017/S0272263105050084
 Lightbown, P. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (pp. 177-196). Cambridge University Press.
 Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feed-back in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-370. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01213.x
 Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: Empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (SSLA), 21, 557-587. doi:10.1017/S0272263199004027
 Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
 Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational abili ty in a second language: A case study of an adult learner. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-369). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
 Tarone, E. E. (1987). Some influences on the syllable structure of inter language phonology. In G. Ioup & S. Weinberger (Eds.), Interlangu age phonology: The acquisition of a second language sound system (pp. 70-85). Cambridge: Newbury House Publishers.
 Vihman, M., Velleman, S., & McCune, L. (1994). How abstract is child phonology? Toward an integration of linguistic and psychological approaches. In M. Yavas (Ed.), First and second Language Phonology (pp. 439-469). Sand Diego: Singular Publishing Group.