CE  Vol.4 No.8 A , August 2013
Student Experience and Ubiquitous Learning in Higher Education: Impact of Wireless and Cloud Applications
ABSTRACT

Mobile learning apps for smartphones and tablet computer devices have entered Higher Education (HE) market. While universities are investing in new technologies, they also look into cost reduction strategies, including cloud computing. We draw upon a case study of a successful migration to mobile virtual environment and effective use of cloud computing at a UK university. Success factors and challenges of these emerging technologies in HE are discussed. The paper concludes with the consideration of student experience implications and research questions which need addressing in the area of ubiquitous learning.




Cite this paper
Benson, V. & Morgan, S. (2013). Student Experience and Ubiquitous Learning in Higher Education: Impact of Wireless and Cloud Applications. Creative Education, 4, 1-5. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.48A001.
References
[1]   Ausburn, L. J. (2004). Course design elements most valued by adult learners in blended online education environments: An American perspective. Educational Media International, 41, 327-337. doi:10.1080/
0952398042000314820

[2]   BlackBoard.com. (2012). Transforming the experience with blackboard mobile.

[3]   Benson, V. (2008). Unlocking the potential of wireless learning. Learn ing and Teaching in Higher Education, 2, 42-56.

[4]   Benson, V., & Anderson, D. (2010). Towards a strategic approach to the introduction of blended learning: Challenges faced and lessons learned. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, E129-E131. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01066.x

[5]   Benson, V., Morgan, S., & Tennakoon, H. (2012). Social networking: A knowledge convergence platform. International Journal of Knowledge Society Research, 6, 56-74.

[6]   Carphonewarehouse Penetration Rate of SmartPhones (2011). 42 major countries ranked by smartphone penetration rates. http://www.wired.com/beyond_the_beyond/2011/12/42-major-countries-ranked-by-smartphone-penetration-rates/

[7]   Coulby, C., Hennessey, S., Davies, N., & Fuller, R. (2011). The use of mobile technology for work-based assessment: the student experi ence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 251-265. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01022.x

[8]   Frederickson,N., Reed, P., & Clifford, M. (2005). Evaluating Web supported learning versus lecture-based teaching: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Higher Education, 50, 645-664. doi:10.1007/
s10734-004-6370-0

[9]   Google Play (2012) Android store user reviews. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.blackboard.android&hl=en

[10]   iTunes (2012). iTune Store BlackBoard Mobile Learn App User Reviews. http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/
blackboard-mobile-learn/id364252826?mt=8


[11]   Internet in Britain Report (2011). OxSIS Internet in Britain Survey.

[12]   LSE Focus (2007). Mobile life Report 2007: The connected world. London: Focus LSE. http://www.mobilelife2007.co.uk/

[13]   Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, Part II: Do they really think differently? On the horizon (pp. 1-7). NCB University Press.

[14]   Winkler, V. (2011). Securing the cloud: Cloud computer security tech niques and tactics (p. 57). Waltham, MA: Elsevier.

[15]   (2013). Learn. http://www.blackboard.com/Platforms/Mobile/

 
 
Top