Tested In and Placed In: Are Sixth-Grade Boys and Girls Completing Early Challenge Math Coursework before They Are Ready?

Show more

References

[1] Baharudin, R., & Luster, T. (1998). Factors related to the quality of the home environment and children’s achievement. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 375-403. doi:10.1177/019251398019004002

[2] Board, J. (2010). Criticism of public education—Inequality of oppor tunity, highly bureaucratic systems, achievement-based outcomes, school choice, reform after reform.
http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2341/Public-Education-Criticism.html

[3] Bracey, G. W. (2008). The algebra hoax. Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 306-307.

[4] Ciechalski, J. C. (2005). Review of the Orleans-Hanna algebra prog nosis test (3rd ed.). Greenville, NC: Professor, East Carolina University.

[5] Daubert, H. (2006). Millard investigation: Conversation with peggy brendel. Omaha, NE: Millard Public Schools.

[6] Dulaney, C. (1996). Should students take algebra I in middle school? E&R Report, 96(.08), Raleigh, NC: Eye on Evaluation—Evaluation and Research Department: Wake County Public School System.

[7] Eamon, M. K. (2005). Social-demographic, school, neighborhood, and parenting influences on academic achievement of Latino young ado lescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 163-175.
doi:10.1007/s10964-005-3214-x

[8] Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national pat terns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psycho logical Bulletin, 136, 103-127. doi:10.1037/a0018053

[9] Fensterwald, J. (2010). Too many students forced to retake algebra. Thoughts on public education: Analysis, opinions and ruminations on California education policy. Silicon Valley Education Foundation.
http://toped.svefoundation.org/2010/03/24/too-many-students-forced-to-retake-algebra/

[10] Gallagher, A., Levin, J., & Cahalan, C. (2002). GRE research: Cogni tive patterns of gender differences on mathematics admissions tests (ETS Report No. 02-19). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

[11] Geist, E. A., & King, M. (2008). Different, not better: Gender differ ences in mathematics learning and achievement. Journal of Instruc tional Psychology, 35, 43-52.

[12] GreatSchools: Involved Parents. Successful Kids (2010). Why is alge bra so important? Algebra is known as a gatekeeper subject, so when should your child take it?
http://www.greatschools.org/students/academic-skills/why-algebra.gs?content=354

[13] Guttenplan, D. D. (2010). Western nations react to poor education re sults. The New York Times.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/09/world/europe/09education.html

[14] Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[15] Halpern, D. F. (2004). A cognitive-process taxonomy for sex differ ences in cognitive abilities. American Psychological Society, 13, 135-139.

[16] Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Association for Psychological Science, 8, 1-51.

[17] Hochschild, J. L. (2003). Social class in public schools. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 821-840. doi:10.1046/j.0022-4537.2003.00092.x

[18] Hyde, J. S., Fennama, E., & Lamon, S. L. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139

[19] James, A. N. (2007). Gender differences and the teaching of mathemat ics. Inquiry, 12, 14-25.

[20] Jeynes, W. H. (2002). Examining the effects of parental absence on the academic achievement of adolescents: The challenge of controlling for family income. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23, 189-210. doi:10.1023/A:1015790701554

[21] Kaput, J. K. (2000). Transforming algebra from an engine of inequity to an engine of mathematical power by “algebrafying” the K-12 cur riculum. Dartmouth, MA: National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.

[22] Katz, V. J. (2007). Algebra: Gateway to a technological future. The Mathematical Association of America (MAA).
http://www.maa.org/algebra-report/Algebra-Gateway-Tech-Future.pdf

[23] Kloosterman, P., Tassell, J., Ponniah, A. G., & Essex, N. K. (2008). Perceptions of mathematics and gender. School Science and Mathe matics, 108, 149-162. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17821.x

[24] Knuth, E. J., Alibali, M. W., McNeil, N. M., Weinberg, A., & Stephens, A. C. (2005). Middle school students’ understanding of core algebra ic concepts: Equivalence & Variable. International Journal on Ma thematics Education (ZDM), 37, 68-76. doi:10.1007/BF02655899

[25] Kuchemann, D., & Secolsky, C. (1985). Review of the Orleans Hanna prognosis test. In J. V. Mitchell Jr. (Ed.), The ninth mental meas urement yearbook (pp. 1105-1106). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.

[26] Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

[27] Lee, J., Grigg, W., & Dion, G. (2007). The Nation’s Report Card: Mathematics 2007 (NCES 2007-494). Washington DC: National Cen ter for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US De partment of Education.
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2007/2007494.asp#pdflist

[28] Loveless, T. (2008). The misplaced math student: Lost in eighth-grade algebra. Washington DC: Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings.

[29] Majoribanks, K. (1996). Family learning environments and students outcomes: A review. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 27, 373-394.

[30] McCoy, L. P. (2005). Effect of demographic and personal variables on achievement in eighth-grade algebra. The Journal of Education Re search, 98, 131-135. doi:10.3200/JOER.98.3.131-135

[31] McNeal, R. B. (2001). Differential effects of parental involvement on cognitive and behavioral outcomes by socioeconomic status. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 171. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00100-1

[32] Muller, C. (1998). Gender differences in parental involvement and ado lescents’ mathematics achievement. Sociology of Education, 71, 336-356. doi:10.2307/2673174

[33] National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP) ( 2011). Breaking down the PISA results. Newsleader, 58, 1-10.

[34] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2002). Principal and standards for school mathematics.
http://standardstrial.nctm.org/document/chapter6/index.htm

[35] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principal and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

[36] Penner, A. M. (2008). Gender difference in extreme mathematical achievement: An international perspective on biological and social factors. American Journal of Psychology, 114, S138-S170.

[37] Raty, H., Kasanen, K., Kiiskinen, J., & Nykky, M. (2004). Learning intelligence—Children’s choices of the best pupils in the mother tongue and mathematics. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 303-312. doi:10.2224/sbp.2004.32.3.303

[38] Sax, L. (2010). Gender differences in learning. NASSPE Research.
http://www.singlesexschools.org/research-learning.htm

[39] Seyfried, S. F. (1998). Academic achievement of African American preadolescents: The influence of teacher perceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 381-402.
doi:10.1023/A:1022107120472

[40] Stacey, K. (2009). Trends in mathematics education research: The example of algebra education. [Peer commentary on the study “The future of the teaching and learning of algebra” by Stacey, K., Chick, H., & Kendal, M.]
http://www.hbcse.tifr.res.in/episteme/episteme-1/epiteme-1-review-papers/stacey

[41] Steen, L. A. (1999). Algebra for all in eighth-grade: What’s the rush? Middle Matters, 8, 6-7.

[42] Steen, L. A. (1992). Does everyone need to study algebra. Mathematics Teacher, 85, 258-260.

[43] Toone, L. T. (2011). Orleans-hanna algebra prognosis test: Informa tion for students, parents, and educators. Farmington, UT: Davis School District. http://www.davis.k12.ut.us/davis

[44] Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (1999). High lights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of US fourth and eighth-graders in an international context. US De partment of Education: National Center for Education Statistics.
http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2001027

[45] US Department of Education (2010). Highlights from PISA 2009: Per formance of US 15-year-old students in reading, mathematics, and science literacy in an international context. US Department of Education: National Center for Education Statistics
http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2011004

[46] US Department of Education (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel.
http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf

[47] Valentine, E. F. (1998). Gender differences in learning and achieve ment in mathematics, science and technology and strategies for eq uity: A literature review. Psychological Foundations of Education for Pre-Service Teachers. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Insti tute & State University.

[48] VanNoy, T. (2010). Teaching embedded algebra to young students.
http://ezinearticles.com/?Teaching-Embedded-Algebra-to-Young-Students&id=4771526

[49] Willingham, W. W., & Cole, N. S. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=99105978

[50] Wu, H. (2001). What is at stake in the K-12 standards wars: A primer for educational policy makers. The 1997 mathematics standards war in California, New York: Peter Lang Publishers.