AJIBM  Vol.3 No.4 , August 2013
An Experimental Analysis of Over-Confidence
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to experimentally demonstrate the existence of the bias of over-confidence as a human psychological bias. This bias was measured by three methods: the estimation interval, the frequency estimation method and the method of question with two answer choices. The estimation interval method finds a very wide bias compared to the other two methods, but overconfidence persists in the other two methods at lower levels. In the first experiment, monetary incentives have exacerbated the over-confidence because of the given compensation. This system has demonstrated that there is a strong link between over-confidence and risk taking. The second experiment that used the method of question with two answer choices was given a different pay system and it was expected that overconfidence will be reduced by monetary incentives but the results show that the bias is not significantly reduced by these new monetary incentives. Similarly, the iteration that was made during the first experiment did not significantly reduce the bias.
Cite this paper: Jemaiel, S. , Mamoghli, C. and Seddiki, M. (2013) An Experimental Analysis of Over-Confidence. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3, 395-417. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2013.34047.

[1]   O. Svenson, “Are We All Less Risky and More Skillful than Our Fellow Driver,” Acta Psychologia, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1981, pp. 143-148. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(81)90005-6

[2]   M. Alpert and H. Raiffa, “A Progress Report on the Training of Probability Assessors,” In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky, Ed., Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982, pp. 294-305. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809477.022

[3]   J. B. De Long, A. Shleifer, S. Lawrence and R. J. Waldmann, “The Survival of Noise Traders in Financial Markets,” Journal of Business, Vol. 64, No. 1, 1991, pp. 1-19. doi:10.1086/296523

[4]   A. Kyle and F. A. Wang, “Speculation Duopoly with Agreement to Disagree: Can Overconfidence Survive the Market Test?” Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, No. 5, 1997, pp. 2073-2090. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02751.x

[5]   T. Odean, “Volume, Volatility, Price and Profit when all Traders are above Average,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 53, No.6, 1998, pp. 1887-1934. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00078

[6]   K. D. Daniel, D. Hirshleifer and A. Subrahmanyam, “Investor Psychology and Security Market Under- and Overreactions,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 53, No. 6, 1998, pp. 1839-1885. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00077

[7]   A. Admati and P. Pfleiderer, “A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1988, pp. 3-40. doi:10.1093/rfs/1.1.3

[8]   F. D. Foster and S. Viswanathan, “A Theory of Interday Variations in Volumes, Variances and Trading Costs,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1990, pp. 593-624. doi:10.1093/rfs/3.4.593

[9]   A. Kyle, “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading,” Econometrica, Vol. 53, No. 6, 1985, pp. 1315-1336. doi:10.2307/1913210

[10]   G. Llorente, R. Michaely, G. Saar and J. Wang, “Dynamic Volume-Return Relation of Individual Stocks,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2002, pp. 1005-1047. doi:10.1093/rfs/15.4.1005

[11]   J. Wang, “A Model of Competitive Stock Trading Volume,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 102, 1994, No. 1, pp. 127-168.

[12]   B. Biais, D. Hilton, K. Mazurier and S. Pouget, “Judgmental Overconfidence, Self-Monitoring and Trading Performance in an Experimental Financial Market,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 72, No. 2, 2005, pp. 287-312. doi:10.1111/j.1467-937X.2005.00333.x

[13]   M. Glaser and M. Weber, “Overconfidence and Trading Volume,” Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2007, pp. 1-36. doi:10.1007/s10713-007-0003-3

[14]   S. Gervais and T. Odean, “Learning to be Overconfident,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1-27. doi:10.1093/rfs/14.1.1

[15]   W. Chuang and B. Lee, “An Empirical Evaluation of the Overconfidence Hypothesis,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 30, No. 9, 2006, pp. 2489-2515. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.08.007

[16]   S. Lichtenstein, B. Fischhoff and L. D. Phillips, “Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art to 1980,” In: D. Kahneman, P. Solvic and A. Tversky, Eds., Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 1982. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809477.023

[17]   J. E. Russo and P. J. H. Schoemaker, “Managing Overconfidence,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1992, pp. 7-17

[18]   D. Davis and C. Holt, “Experimental Economics,” Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1993.

[19]   V. Smith and J. Walker, “Monetary Rewards and Decision Cost in Experimental Economics,” Economic Inquiry, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1993, pp. 245-261. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1993.tb00881.x

[20]   P. Juslin, P. Wennerholm and H. Olsson, “Format Dependence in Subjective Probability Calibration,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 25, No. 4, 1999, pp. 1038-1052. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.1038

[21]   D. Cesarini, O. Sandewall and M. Johannesson, “Confidence Interval Estimation Tasks and the Economics of Overconfidence,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2006, pp. 453-470. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2004.10.010

[22]   J. Klayman, J. B. Soll, C. Gonzalez-Vallejo and C. Barlas, “Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What and Whom You Ask,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 79, No. 3, 1999, pp. 216-247. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2847