In this paper, a Beddington-DeAngelis type chemostat model with nutrient recycling and impulsive input is considered. Except using Floquet theorem, introducing a new method combining with comparison theorem of impulse differential equation and by using the Liapunov function method, the sufficient and necessary conditions on the permanence and extinction of the microorganism are obtained. Two examples are given in the last section to verify our mathematical results. The numerical analysis shows that if only the system is permanent, then it also is globally attractive.
 G. J. Butler, S. B. Hsu and P. Waltman, “A Mathematical Model of the Chemostat with Periodic Washout Rate,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 45, No. 3, 1985, pp. 435-449. doi:10.1137/0145025
 P. Lemas, “Coexistence of Three Competing Microbial Populations in a Chemostat with Periodic Input and Dilu tion Rate,” Mathematical Bioscience, Vol. 129, No. 2, 1995, pp. 111-142. doi:10.1016/0025-5564(94)00056-6
 X. He and S. Ruan, “Global Stability in Chemostat-Type Plankton Models with Delayed Nutrient Recycling,” Re search Report, The School of Mathematical and Statistics, University of Sydney, 1996, pp. 96-98.
 S. Ruan and X. He, “Global Stability in Chemostat-Type Competition Models with Nutrient Recycling,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 58, No. 1, 1998, pp. 170-192. doi:10.1137/S0036139996299248
 S. R. J. Jang, “Dynamics of Variable-Yield Nutrient Phytoplankton-Zooplankton Models with Nutrient Recy cling and Self-Shading,” Journal of Mathematical Biol ogy, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2000, pp. 229-250. doi:10.1007/s002850050179
 S. Sun and L. Chen, “Complex Dynamics of a Chemotat with Variable Yield and Periodically Impulsive Perturba tion on the Substrate,” Journal of Mathematical Chemis try, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2008, pp. 338-348. doi:10.1007/s10910-006-9200-z
 Z. D. Teng, R. Gao, R. Mehbuba and K. Wang, “Global Behaviors of Monod type Chemostat Model with Nutrient Recycling and Impusive Onput,” Journal of Mathemati cal Chemistry, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2010, pp. 276-294. doi:10.1007/s10910-009-9567-8