OPJ  Vol.3 No.2 B , June 2013
Ghost Imaging Lidar via Sparsity Constraints in Real Atmosphere
Abstract: We present a series of results acquired at a 2-kilometer distance using our lidar system under several weather conditions, clear, cloudy, light rain, moderately foggy, and night. The experimental results show that ghost imaging lidar via spar-sity constraints can realize imaging in all these weather conditions.
Cite this paper: M. Chen, E. Li, W. Gong, Z. Bo, X. Xu, C. Zhao, X. Shen, W. Xu and S. Han, "Ghost Imaging Lidar via Sparsity Constraints in Real Atmosphere," Optics and Photonics Journal, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2013, pp. 83-85. doi: 10.4236/opj.2013.32B021.

[1]   S. M. Spuler and S. D. Mayor, “Scanning Eye-Safe Elastic Backscatter Lidar at 1.54um,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 696-703, 2005.doi:10.1175/JTECH1755.1

[2]   R. M. Marino, T. Stephens, R. E. Hatch, J. L. McLaughlin, J. G. Mooney and O'Brien, et al. “A Compact 3 D Imaging Laser Radar System Using Geiger-Mode APD Arrays-System and Measurements,” Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 5086, No. 1-15, 2003. doi:10.1117/12.501581

[3]   Gleckler, A. D. and A. Gelbart. “Multipleslit streak tube imaging lidar (MS-STIL) applications,” Proceedings SPIE, Vol. 4035, No. 266-278, 2000. doi:10.1117/12.397800

[4]   N. D. Hardy and J. H. Shapiro, “Computational Ghost Imaging Versus Imaging Laser Radar for 3D Imaging,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.3253, 2012. unpublished.

[5]   S. M. Beck, J. R. Buck, W. F. Buell, R.P. Dickinson, D. A. Kozlowski, N. J. Marechal, et al. “Syntheticaperture imaging laser radar: laboratory demonstration and signal processing,” Applied Optics, Vol. 44, No. 35, pp. 7621-7629, 2005. doi:10.1364/AO.44.007621

[6]   M. Bashkansky, R. L. Lucke, E. Funk, L. J. Rickard and J. Reintjes, “Two-Dimensional Synthetic Aperture Imaging in the Optical Domain,” Optics letters, Vol. 27, No. 22, 2002, pp. 1983-1985. doi:10.1364/OL.27.001983

[7]   L. Liren, Z. Yu and Z. Yanan, “A Large-Aperture SynThetic Aperture Imaging Ladar Demonstrator and Its Verification in Laboratory Space,” Acta Optica Sinica, Vol. 31, No. 9, 2011, p. 0900112. doi:10.3788/AOS201131.0900112

[8]   C. Zhao, W. Gong, M. Chen, E. Li, H. Wang, W. Xu, et al., “Ghost Imaging Lidar Via Sparsity Constraints,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 101, 2012, p. 141123. doi:10.1063/1.4757874

[9]   J. Cheng, “Ghost imaging through turbulent atmosphere,” Optics express, Vol. 17, No.10, 2009, pp.7916-7921. doi:10.1364/OE.17.007916

[10]   P. Zhang, W. Gong, X. Shen and S. Han, “Correlated imaging through atmospheric turbulence,” Physical Review A, Vol. 82, 2010, p. 033817. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.82.033817

[11]   R. E. Meyers, K. S. Deacon, Y. Shih, “Positive-negative turbulence-free ghost imaging,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol.100,No.13,2012,p.131114. doi:10.1063/1.3698158

[12]   R. E. Meyers, , K. S. Deacon, A. D. Tunick and Y. Shih, “Virtual Ghost Imaging through Turbulence and Obscurants Using Bessel Beam Illumination,” Applied Physics Letters,Vol.100,No.6, 2012,pp.061126-061129. doi:10.1063/1.3684613

[13]   P. Zhang, W. Gong, X. Shen, D. Huang and S. Han, “Improving resolution by the second-order correlation of light fields,” Optics letters,Vol.34, No.8, 2009,pp. 1222-1224. doi:10.1364/OL.34.001222

[14]   O. Katz, Y. Bromberg and Y. Silberberg, “Compressive ghost imaging,” Applied Physics Letters,Vol.95, No.13, 2009,pp.131110-131112. doi:10.1063/1.3238296

[15]   W. Gong and S. Han, “Super-Resolution Ghost Imaging via Compressive Sampling Reconstruction,” arXiv preprint arXiv:0910.4823, 2009.

[16]   W. Gong and S. Han, “A Method to Improve the Visibility of Ghost Images Obtained by Thermal Light,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 374, No.8, 2010, pp. 1005-1008. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2009.12.030

[17]   E. Li, M. Chen, W. Gong, H. Wang and S. Han, “A Fast Converging Sparse Reconstruction Algorithm in Ghost Imaging,” Journal of Electronics, No.6,2012, pp. 617-620. doi:10.1007/s11767-012-0878-8