Back
 CE  Vol.4 No.7 A , July 2013
When Children Draw vs When Children Don’t: Exploring the Effects of Observational Drawing in Science
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate how kindergarten children’s observational drawings impact their information retention. This research was conducted in an urban school in a large metropolitan area in the southwestern United States. Forty-two kindergarten children participated in this study; approximately 97% of them qualified for free and/or reduced lunch. For this study, children’s retention of factual information was compared using a paired t-test of when they drew and when they didn’t. Children scored higher on all 7 items—descriptions of observation, location, action, color, size, shape, and sound—when they drew than when they didn’t. Findings were statistically significant for descriptions of observation (t = 3.08, p = .00) and location (t = 2.36, p = .02).
Cite this paper: Fox, J. & Lee, J. (2013). When Children Draw vs When Children Don’t: Exploring the Effects of Observational Drawing in Science. Creative Education, 4, 11-14. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.47A1002.
References

[1]   Abruscato, J. (2004). Teaching children science. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

[2]   Alden, A. (2009). What is observing? An explanation of observation. http://geology.about.com/od/
activitiesbasics/a/observation.htm


[3]   American Association for the Advancement of Science (1997). Resources for scientific literacy: Professional development. New York: Oxford University Press.

[4]   Bosse, S., Jacobs, G., & Anderson, T. L. (2009). Science in the air. Young Children, 64, 10-15.

[5]   Brooks, M. (2003). Drawing to learn. NAEYC Beyond Journal. http://www.naeyc.org/files/yc/file/2003
09/DrawingtoLearn.pdf


[6]   Brooks, M. (2009). Drawing, visualization and young children’s exploration of “Big Ideas.” International Journal of Science Education, 31, 319-341. doi:10.1080/09500690802595771

[7]   California Department of Education (1998). Science content standards for California public schools. http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/sciencestnd.pdf

[8]   Connecticut State Department of Education (2004). Core science curriculum framework. http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/cwp/view.asp?a=26188q=320890

[9]   Dove, J. E., Everett, L. A., & Preece, P. F. W. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children’s drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 485-497. doi:10.1080/095006999290534

[10]   Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From every day to scientific observation: How children learn to observe the biologist’s world. Re view of Educational Research, 79, 39-68. doi:10.3102/0034654308325899

[11]   Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (1998). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach advanced reflections (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Ablex.

[12]   Ford, D. (2005). The challenges of observing geologically: Third graders’ descriptions of rock and mineral properties. International Journal of Science, 89, 276-295.

[13]   Fox, J. E. (2010). The role of drawing in kindergarteners’ science observations. International Research Journal for Art in Early Childhood Education, 2.

[14]   Howes, E. V. (2007). Educative experiences and early childhood science education: A Deweyan perspective on learning to observe. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 536-549. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.03.006

[15]   Howitt, C., Lewis, S., & Upson, E. (2011). “It’s a mystery!” a case study of implementing forensic science in preschool as scientific inquiry. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36, 45-55.

[16]   Jolley, R. P. (2010). Children and pictures: Drawing and understanding. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

[17]   Kaatz, K. (2008). A walk in the “tall, tall grass.” Science and Children, 45, 28-31.

[18]   Kallery, M., Psillos, D., & Tselfes, V. (2009). Typical didactical active ties in the Greek early years science classroom: Do they promote science learning? International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1187-1204. doi:10.1080/09500690701824850

[19]   Kepler, L. (1998). Hands-on science: Journals of science. Instructor, 108, 82-83.

[20]   National Committee on Science Education Standards (1996). National science education standards. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.

[21]   Quigley, C., Pongsanon, K., & Akerson, V. L. (2010). If we teach them, they can learn: Young students views of nature of science aspects to early elementary students during an informal science education program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 887-907. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9164-5

[22]   Samarapungavan, A., Patrick, H., & Manticopoulos, P. (2011). What kindergarten children learn in inquiry-based science classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 416-470. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.608027

[23]   Schulte, C. M. (2011). Verbalization in children’s drawing performances: Toward a metaphorical continuum, of inscription, extension, and re-inscription. Studies in Art Education, 53, 20-34.

[24]   Shephardson, D. P., & Britsch, S. J. (2001). The role of children’s journals in elementary science activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 43-69. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<43::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-I

[25]   Texas Education Agency (1998). Texas essential knowledge and skills. http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter112/index.html

[26]   Virginia Department of Education (2009). Virginia standards of learning. http://www.doe.virginia.gov/testing/sol/standards_docs/science/2010/complete/stds_all_science.pdf

 
 
Top