JEP  Vol.4 No.7 A , July 2013
Analytical Monitoring of the Chemicals Present in the Discharge Water Generated by the Surface Treatment Industry

Industrial discharge water, and especially that from the surface treatment industry (ST), contains non-negligible amounts of pollutants even though the legislation is fully respected. In spite of this, no detailed studies list the exact chemical composition of these effluents. The present study reports the results of analyses performed over a 6-month period involving 15 standard water parameters. Over 160 substances including 33 metals, 58 volatile organic compounds (VOCs), 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), 24 chlorophenols (CPs), 16 alkylphenols (APs), 5 chloroanilines (CAs) and 7 polychlorobiphenyls (PCBs) were monitored. The industrial effluents presented polycontamination involving metals, minerals and organics with a high degree of qualitative and quantitative variability. Of the 160 substances monitored, 46 were regularly found: 25 inorganics including 8 metals (Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb, Sn, Zn) and 21 organics (4 PAHs, 10 VOCs, 4 CPs and 3 APs). Eighteen were systematically presented at quantifiable levels.

Cite this paper: N. Morin-Crini, C. Druart, S. Gavoille, C. Lagarrigue and G. Crini, "Analytical Monitoring of the Chemicals Present in the Discharge Water Generated by the Surface Treatment Industry," Journal of Environmental Protection, Vol. 4 No. 7, 2013, pp. 53-60. doi: 10.4236/jep.2013.47A007.

[1]   M. Fuerhacker, “The Water Framework Directive—Can We Reach the Target?” Water Science and Technology, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2008, pp. 9-17. doi:10.2166/wst.2008.797

[2]   M. Fuerhacker, “EU Water Framework Directive and Stockholm Convention Can We Reach the Targets for Priority Substances and Persistent Organic Pollutants?” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2009, pp. 92-97. doi:10.1007/s11356-009-0126-4

[3]   M. Ostoich, A. Critto, A. Marcomini, E. Aimo, M. Gerotto and L. Menegus, “Implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC: Risk-Based Monitoring for the Control of Dangerous and Priority Substances,” Chemistry and Ecology, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2009, pp. 257-275. doi:10.1080/02757540903103857

[4]   S. Zgheib, R. Moilleron and G. Chebbo, “What Priority Pollutants Occur in Stormwater and Wastewater,” Water Pollution, Vol. 135, No. 1, 2010, pp. 3-13.

[5]   A. G. Chmielewski, T. S. Urbanski and W. Migdal, “Separation Technologies for Metals Recovery from Industrial Wastes,” Hydrometallurgy, Vol. 45, No. 3, 1997, pp. 333-344. doi:10.1016/S0304-386X(96)00090-4

[6]   J. F. Blais, S. Dufresne and G. Mercier, “Etat du Développement Technologique en Matière d’Enlèvement des Métaux des Effluents Industriels (in French),” Revue des Sciences de l’Eau, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1999, pp. 687-711. doi:10.7202/705373ar

[7]   J. Fresner, H. Schnitzer, G. Gwehenberger, M. Planasch, C. Brunner, K. Taferner and J. Mair, “Pratical Experiences with the Implementation of the Concept of Zero Emissions in the Surface Treatment Industry in Austria,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 15, No. 13-14, 2007, pp. 1228-1239. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.024

[8]   M. A. Barakat, “New Trends in Removing Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewater,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2011, pp. 361-377. doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.07.019

[9]   F. Fu and Q. J. Wang, “Review of Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewaters: A Review,” Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 92, No. 3, 2011, pp. 407-418. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011

[10]   B. Sancey, N. Morin-Crini, L. F. Lucas, F. Degiorgi, J. F. Minary, P. M. Badot and G. Crini, “La Bioadsorption sur Amidon Réticulé pour Enlever des Métaux des Effluents Industriels (in French), ” Revue des Sciences de l’Eau. Vol. 23, No. 3, 2010, pp. 275-287. doi:10.7202/044689ar

[11]   B. Sancey, J. Charles, G. Trunfio, P. M. Badot, M. Jacquot, X. Hutinet, S. Gavoille and G. Crini, “Effect of Additional Sorption Treatment by Cross-Linked Starch of Wastewater from a Surface Finishing Plant,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2011, pp. 1749-1756. doi:10.1021/ie1010492