OJOG  Vol.3 No.5 B , July 2013
The relationship between maternal body fat and pre-implantation embryonic weight: Implications for survival and long-term development in an assisted reproductive environment

There can be little argument that embryo quality is one of the most critical factors in the success of assisted reproductive techniques. Yet the current methods of grading embryos are subjective at best. While a number of different groups have described more qualitative means of assessing embryo quality, the current standard remains morphology. Morphology has proven a good standard, but it does not allow for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities nor can it assess the biochemical status of the embryo prior to transfer. This laboratory recently described a method to estimate embryo weight and suggested weight might be a good indicator of biochemical status. The objective of the present study was to determine the relationship between maternal body composition and embryo weight and determine the influence maternal chemistry had on embryo development. The data continue to suggest that maternal body composition, especially body fat, influences the chemical nature of the embryo and may play a critical role in long-term survival.

Cite this paper
Weathers, J. , Zimmerer, N. , Penrose, L. , Graves-Evenson, K. and Prien, S. (2013) The relationship between maternal body fat and pre-implantation embryonic weight: Implications for survival and long-term development in an assisted reproductive environment. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3, 1-5. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2013.35A2001.
[1]   Templeton, A. and Morris, J.K. (1998) Reducing the risk of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in vitro fertilization. The New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 573-577. doi:10.1056/NEJM199808273390901

[2]   Templeton, A. (2000) Assessing the outcome of IVF. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 900, 345-350. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06247.x

[3]   Sullivan, E.A., Zegers-Hochschild, F., Mansour, R., Ishihara, O., de Mouzon, J., Nygren, K.G. and Adamson, G.D. (2013) International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: Assisted reproductive technology 2004. Human Reproduction, 28, 1375-1390. doi:10.1093/humrep/det036

[4]   Chang, H.H., Larson, J., Blencowe, H., Spong, C.Y., Howson, C.P., Cairns-Smith, S., Lackritz, E.M., Lee, S.K., Mason, E., Serazin, A.C., Walani, S., Simpson, J.L., Lawn, J.E. and Born Too Soon Preterm Prevention Analysis Group (2013) Preventing preterm births: Analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index. Lancet, 381, 223-234. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61856-X

[5]   Racowsky, C., Vernon, M., Mayer, J., Ball, G.D., Behr, B., Pomeroy, K.O., Wininger, D., Gibbons, W., Conaghan, J. and Stern, J.E. (2010) Standardization of grading embryo morphology. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 27, 437-439. doi:10.1007/s10815-010-9443-2

[6]   Gerris, J., De Neubourg, D., Mangelschots, K., et al. (1999) Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Human Reproduction, 14, 2581-2587. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.10.2581

[7]   Alfarawati, S., Fragouli, E., Colls, P., et al. (2011) The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 520-524. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.003

[8]   Lane, M. and Gardner, D.K. (1996) Selection of viable mouse blastocysts prior to transfer using a metabolic criterion. Human Reproduction, 11, 1975-1978. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals. humrep.a019527

[9]   Houghton, F.D., Hawkhead, J.A., Humpherson, P.G., et al. (2002) Non-invasive amino acid turnover predicts human embryo developmental capacity. Human Reproduction, 17, 999-1005.

[10]   Brison, D.R., Houghton, F.D., Falconer, D., et al. (2004) Identification of viable embryos in IVF by non-invasive measurement of amino acid turnover. Human Reproduction, 19, 2319-2324. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh409

[11]   Gardner, D.K. and Leese, H.J. (1987) Assessment of embryo viability prior to transfer by the noninvasive measurement of glucose uptake. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 242, 103-105. doi:10.1002/jez.1402420115

[12]   Jones, G.M., Trounson, A., Vella, P.J., et al. (2001) Glucose metabolism of human morula and blastocyst-stage embryos and its relationship to viability after transfer. Reproductive BioMedicine, 3, 124-132

[13]   Sakkas, D. and Gardner, D.K. (2005) Noninvasive methods to assess embryo quality. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 17, 283-288. doi:10.1097/01.gco.0000169106.69881.3e

[14]   Mu?oz, G. and Bongiorni-Malavé, I. (1979) Influence of dietary protein restriction on ovulation, fertilization rates and pre-implantation embryonic development in mice. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 210, 253-257. doi:10.1002/jez.1402100208

[15]   Abe, H., Yamashita, S., Satoh, T. and Hoshi, H. (2002) Accumulation of cytoplasmic lipid droplets in bovine embryos and cryotolerance of embryos developed in different culture systems using serum-free or serum-containing media. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 61, 57-66. doi:10.1002/mrd.1131

[16]   Barcelo-Fimbres, M. and Seidel Jr., G.E. (2007) Effects of either glucose or fructose and metabolic regulators on bovine embryo development and lipid accumulation in vitro. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 74, 1406-1418. doi:10.1002/mrd.20700

[17]   Weathers, J. (2008) Early indications of breed differences for cryopreservation of embryos in cattle. Master’s Thesis. https://repositories.tdl.org/ttu-ir/handle/2346/18883

[18]   Roche, J.F. (2006) The effect of nutritional management of the dairy cow on reproductive efficiency. Animal Reproduction Science, 96, 282-296. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.007

[19]   Luzzo, K.M., Wang, Q., Purcell, S.H., et al. (2012) High fat diet induced developmental defects in the mouse: Oocyte meiotic aneuploidy and fetal growth retardation/brain defects. 2012. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152876