SM  Vol.3 No.3 , July 2013
The Role of Maternalism in Contemporary Paid Domestic Work
Author(s) Amanda Moras*
ABSTRACT

Various studies of domestic work have identified close personal relationships between domestic workers and employers as a key instrument in the exploitation of domestic workers, allowing employers to solicit unpaid services as well as a sense of superiority (Rollins, 1985; Romero, 2002; Glenn, 1992; Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2001). Likewise, other scholars have pointed out that close employee-employer relationships may actually empower domestic workers, increasing job leverage (Thorton-Dill, 1994). Ultimately, these lines are blurry and ever changing as employers continuously redefine employee expectations. Drawing from a larger study involving thirty interviews with white upper middle class women who currently employ domestic workers (mostly housecleaners) this paper explores employers’ interactions with domestic workers. Through these interviews this research elaborates on how employers and employees interact, how employers feel about these interactions, and explores to what extent these interactions are informed by the widely reported maternalistic tendencies of the past, while also considering the consequences of this.


Cite this paper
Moras, A. (2013). The Role of Maternalism in Contemporary Paid Domestic Work. Sociology Mind, 3, 248-256. doi: 10.4236/sm.2013.33033.
References
[1]   Amott, T., & Matthaei, J. (1996). Race, gender & work: A multicultural economic history of women in the United States. Boston, MA: South End Press.

[2]   Anderson, B. (2001). Just another job? Paying for domestic work. Gender and Development, 9, 25-33.

[3]   Arnada, J. (2003). Maternalism in mistress-maid relations: The Phillipine experience. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 4, 154-177.

[4]   Chang, G. (2000). Disposable domestics: Immigrant women workers in the global economy. Boston, MA: South End Press.

[5]   Department of Labor (2010). Women in the labor force in 2010. www.dol.gov

[6]   Duffy, M. (2007). Doing the dirty work: Gender, race and reproductive labor in historical perspective. Gender and Society, 21, 313-336.

[7]   Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

[8]   Glenn, E. N. (1992). From servitude to service work: Historical continuities in the racial division of paid reproductive labor. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 18, 1-43.

[9]   Hochschild, A. R. (2004). Love and gold. In A. R. Hochschild, & B. Ehrenreich (Eds.), Global women: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. New York: Owl Books.

[10]   Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Penguin.

[11]   Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The managed hand: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

[12]   Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2001). Doméstica: Immigrant workers cleaning and caring in the shadows of affluence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

[13]   Parrenas, R. S. (2001). Servants of globalization: Women, migration, and domestic work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

[14]   Rollins, J. (1985). Between women: Domestics and their employers. Phildelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

[15]   Romero, M. (2002). Maid in the USA. New York: Routledge.

[16]   Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[17]   Thorton-Dill, B. (1994). Across the boundaries of race and class: An exploration of work and family among black female domestic servants. New York: Garland Publishing.

[18]   US Bureau of Labor Statistics (2006). Women in the labor force: A databook. US Department of Labor.

[19]   US Census Bureau (2000). Neighborhood fact sheets.www.census.gov

 
 
Top