SM  Vol.3 No.3 , July 2013
An Inquiry into Cultural Continuity and Change in Housing: An Iranian Perspective
ABSTRACT

The arrival of modernization has had an adverse effect on current Iranian housing architecture; as such, that it is now finds itself in a difficult predicament. Therefore, various national architectural conferences, in addition to individual investigations, have been focused on the renewal of Iranian housing architecture over recent decades. Whilst these examples have not culminated or resulted in defining a clear Iranian trend and in housing with recognizable characteristics, it would be useful to explore some of the more successful examples in order to obtain an overview of what has been done in Iran in this respect during recent years. Accordingly, the study has focused on identifying the architectural characteristics of Iranian houses, which have been modified and used in the present designs. In this study, through a comparative typological analysis of the different traditional Iranian housing types, their main characteristics have been categorized. The categorization later applied for the analysis of the contemporary houses designs. The results of this investigation have shown that, in contemporary samples, although the idea of Iranian traditional houses has remained; the concept of traditional houses has been altered and changed.


Cite this paper
Sani, R. & Mahasti, P. (2013). An Inquiry into Cultural Continuity and Change in Housing: An Iranian Perspective. Sociology Mind, 3, 230-237. doi: 10.4236/sm.2013.33031.
References
[1]   Atabaki, T. (2005). Ethnic diversity and territorial integrity of Iran: Domestic harmony and regional challenges. Iranian Studies, 38, 23-44. doi:10.1080/0021086042000336528

[2]   Banani, A. (1961). The modernization of Iran (1921-1941). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

[3]   Bosworth, C. E. (1996). The safawids, the new Islamic dynasties, a chronological and genealogical manual. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.

[4]   Cleveland, W. (2004). A history of the modern Middle East (3rd ed.). Boulder: Westview.

[5]   Derakhshani, F. (2004). Iran and Aga Khan Award for architecture, Iran: Architecture for changing societies. http://www.archnet.org/library

[6]   Diba, D. (1980). Technical review of Shushtar New Town, the Agha Khan Award for architecture. http://www.archnet.org

[7]   Diba, D. (1991). Regional report: Iran and contemporary architecture, MIMAR 38: Architecture in development. London: Concept Media Ltd. http://www.archnet.org

[8]   Diba, K. (1980). The recent housing boom in Iran—Lessons to remember. In L. Safran (Ed.), Housing: Process and physical form. Philadelphia: Aga Khan Award for Architecture. http://www.archnet.org

[9]   Haeri, M. (2002). Dream house—Kashan’s Persian houses, ME’MAR. Iranian Quarterly on Architecture and Urban Design, 88-98.

[10]   Keddie, N. (1998). Iran: Understanding the enigma: A historian’s view. MERIA Journal (Middle East Review of International Affairs), 2, 3. http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/1998/issue3/keddie.pdf

[11]   Laurel, B. (2003). Muscular design, design research-methods and perspectives, do you need this in again? Los Angeles: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[12]   Lawrence, R. (2005). Methodologies in contemporary housing research: A critical review. In D. U. Vestbro, Y. Hurol, & N. Wilkinson (Eds.), Methodologies in housing research. Gateshead: The Urban International Press.

[13]   Lin, G. (2002). Hong Kong and the globalisation of the Chinese diaspora: A geographical perspective. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 43, 63-91. doi:10.1111/1467-8373.00158

[14]   Morgan, D. (1999). Rethinking Safavid Shiism, the heritage of Sufism. Oxford: Oneworld.

[15]   Oliver, P. (2003). Dwellings—The vernacular houses world wide. London: Phaidon.

[16]   Passi, A. (2002). Bounded spaces in the mobile world: Deconstructing “regional identity”. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9663.00190

[17]   Petherbridge, G. (1995). The house and society. In G. Michell (Ed.), Architecture of the Islamic world—Its history and social meaning. London: Thames and Hudson.

[18]   Rapaport, A. (2007). The nature of the courtyard house: A conceptual analysis. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, XVIII, 57-71.

[19]   Sudjic, D., & Beyerle, T. (1999). Home, the twentieth-century house. London: Laurence King.

[20]   Weston, R. (2002). The house in the twentieth century. London: Laurence King.

 
 
Top