BLR  Vol.4 No.2 , June 2013
Democratic Rights: Decision-Making by Law Makers and Law Enforcers
Author(s) Peter Emerson
The court of law is often adversarial; the more usual question, after all, is binary: guilty or not guilty? The parliament which makes the law, however, need not subject complex questions to dichotomous judgements, or a series of dichotomies: indeed, the corresponding debate should consider all relevant options on an equal basis. Accordingly, this article questions the propriety of a majoritarian polity, considers a less adversarial voting procedure, and contemplates a more inclusive political structure, in order then to argue that human rights legislations should be far more specific on the subject of democratic rights. Such a development may depend less upon the politician and more upon the lawyer.

Cite this paper
P. Emerson, "Democratic Rights: Decision-Making by Law Makers and Law Enforcers," Beijing Law Review, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2013, pp. 77-81. doi: 10.4236/blr.2013.42010.
[1]   Churchill, W. S. (1974). A history of the English-speaking peoples. London: Cassell.

[2]   Emerson, P. (2000). From Belfast to the Balkans. Belfast: The de Borda Institute.

[3]   Emerson, P. (2007). Designing an all-inclusive democracy. Heidelberg: Springer.

[4]   Emerson, P. (2012). Defining democracy. Heidelberg: Springer.

[5]   Emerson, P. (2013). The original Borda count and partial voting. Social Choice and Welfare, 40, 353-358.

[6]   Government of Ireland (1996). Report of the constitution review group. Dublin: Government of Ireland.

[7]   Huntington, S. P. (1997). The clash of civilisations. New York: Simon and Schuster.

[8]   Kapusciński, R. (2002). The shadow of the sun. London: Penguin.

[9]   Ketcham, R. (1984). Presidents above party. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.

[10]   Lewis, S. A. (1965). Politics in West Africa. London: George Allen and Unwin.

[11]   McLean, I., & Urken, A. B. (1995). Classics of social choice. Ann Abbor: University of Michigan.

[12]   Saari, D. G. (2008). Disposing dictators, demystifying voting paradoxes. Cambridge: Cup.

[13]   Sigmund, P. E. (1963). Nicholas of Cusa and medieval political thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[14]   Ste Croix, G. E. M. (2005). Athenian democratic origins. Oxford: Oup.

[15]   Woodward, S. L. (1995). Balkan tragedy. Washington DC: The Brookings Institute.