Back
 OJPP  Vol.3 No.2 , May 2013
Objects, Elements, and Affirmation of the Ethical
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the theory of material objects often referred to as mereological nihilism supports a fine-grained and analytically coherent reading of Emmanuel Levinas’s concept of “elements” as articulated by Levinas primarily in Totality and Infinity. This reading, in turn, allows for a second conclusion, namely the affirmation of the ethical as the possible ground of all other philosophy.
Cite this paper: Donnelly, M. (2013). Objects, Elements, and Affirmation of the Ethical. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 285-291. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2013.32045.
References

[1]   Calarco, M. (2010). Faced by animals. In P. Atterton, & M. Calarco (Eds.), Radicalizing Levinas (pp. 113-135). Albany: State University of New York Press.

[2]   Drabinski, J. E. (2001). Sense and Singularity. Albany: State University of New York Press.

[3]   Eubanks, C. L., & Gauthier, D. J. (2011). The politics of the homeless spirit: Heidegger and Levinas on Dwelling and Hospitality. History of Political Thought, 32, 125-146.

[4]   Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Translated by John and Robinson, Edward Macquarrie. New York: Harper Collins,.

[5]   Hirst, A. (2007). Levinas separates the (hu)man from the nonhuman, using hunger, enjoyment and anxiety to illuminate their relationship. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 3, 159.

[6]   Koslicki, K. (2008). The structure of objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539895.001.0001

[7]   Levinas, E. (1996). Is ontology fundamental? In E. Levinas (Ed.), Basic philosophical writings (pp. 1-10). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

[8]   Levinas, E. (1996). Meaning and sense. In E. Levinas (Ed.), Basic philosophical writings (pp. 33-64). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

[9]   Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

[10]   Levinas, E. (1996). Transcendence and Height. In E. Levinas (Ed.), Basic philosophical writings (pp. 11-32). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

[11]   Lingis, A. (2010). The environment: A critical appreciation of Levinas’s analysis in existence and existens. Levinas Studies, 5, 65-82.

[12]   Locke, J. (1690). Second treatise of government. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.

[13]   Martin, R. M. (1992). Logical semiotics and mereology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

[14]   Martin, R. M. (1988). Metaphysical foundations: Mereology and metalogic. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.

[15]   Nuyen, A. T. (2001). The “ethical anthropic principle” and the religious ethics of Levinas. Journal of Religious Ethics, 40, 427-442. doi:10.1163/156916410X524457

[16]   Quine, W. V. (1970). Philosophy of logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,.

[17]   Richardson, W. J. (1995). The irresponsible subject. In A. T. Peperzak, Ed., Ethics as first philosophy (pp. 123-136). New York: Routledge.

[18]   Sallis, J. (2010). Levinas and the elemental. In P. Atterton, & M. Calarco (Eds.), Radicalizing Levinas (pp. 87-94). Albany: State University of New York Press.

[19]   Sealey, K. (2010). The primacy of disruption in Levinas’s account of transcendence. Research in Phenomenology, 40, 363-377. doi:10.1163/156916410X524457

[20]   Tallion, A. (1995). Nonintentional affectivity. In A. T. Peperzak (Ed.), Ethics as first philosophy (pp. 107-122). New York: Routledge.

[21]   Thomasson, A. (2007). Ordinary objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195319910.001.0001

[22]   van Inwagen, P. (1990). Material beings. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

[23]   Westphal, M. (1995). Levinas’s teleological suspension of the religious. In A. T. Peperzak (Ed.), Ethics as first philosophy (pp. 151-160). New York: Routledge.

[24]   Wyschogrod, E. (2000). Emmanuel Levinas: The problem of ethical metaphysics. New York: Fordham University Press.

 
 
Top