MSA  Vol.4 No.5 , May 2013
Process Adaption and Modifications of a Nutrient Removing Wastewater Treatment Plant in Sri Lanka Operated at Low Loading Conditions
ABSTRACT

The Sri Lankan national water authority, that is The National Water Supply and Drainage Board (NWS&DB) has taken a new wastewater treatment plant into operation at Ja Ela, North of Colombo. The plant has been in operation since September 2011. In April 2012, it was concluded how a test of the aeration efficiency and a performance test should be carried out. The tests have been based on the actual loading of the plant and the analysis results from the daily process control. The evaluation of the aeration efficiency is not reported in this paper. The paper presents the overall performance of the water treatment part of the plant during start-up conditions, from fall 2011 through the first five months of 2012. The results from the operation are found in Table 1. An important circumstance at the plant is the current very low loading in comparison with the design load. This fact has resulted in an introduction of an intermittent mode of the aeration (nitrification) reactor. Based on operation figures, during more than a month (May 2012), it has been possible to give a realistic assessment of the overall performance. The most striking results are summarized as follows: 1) The intermittent operation has enabled an energy efficient operation of the plant. By the introduction of the intermittent aeration, the energy consumption has been reduced by around 75%, compared with the continuous operation mode; 2) The plant performance during the intermittent operation has been improved with respect to virtually all important pollution variables. The most striking improvement is the discharge total P level, reflecting that a substantial enhanced biological phosphorus removal takes. The typical discharge levels found during May 2012, were compared with the earlier obtained values. It is important to underline that the loading on the plant has slightly increased during May as compared with the previous operation period.


Cite this paper
J. Berg and S. Morling, "Process Adaption and Modifications of a Nutrient Removing Wastewater Treatment Plant in Sri Lanka Operated at Low Loading Conditions," Materials Sciences and Applications, Vol. 4 No. 5, 2013, pp. 299-306. doi: 10.4236/msa.2013.45038.
References
[1]   M. J. Tetreault, B. Rusten, A. H. Benedict and J. F. Kreissl, “Assessment of Phased Isolation Ditch Technologies,” The 59th Annual Conference of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 7 October 1986.

[2]   R. I. Irvine, “Technology Assessment of Sequencing Batch Reactors,” US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, 1983.

[3]   R. L. Irvine, et al., “Analysis of Full-Scale SBR Operation at Grundy Center, Iowa,” Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 59, No. 3, 1987, pp. 132-138.

[4]   E. C. Hoepker and E. D. Schroeder, “The Effect of Loading Rate on Batch-Activated Sludge Effluent Quality,” Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 51, No. 2, 1979, pp. 264-270.

[5]   S. Marklund and S. Morling, “Biological Phosphorus Removal at Temperatures from 3 to 10°C—A Full Scale Study of a Sequencing Batch Reactor Unit,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1994, pp. 81-88. doi:10.1139/l94-008

[6]   L. Rieger, I. Takás and H. Siegrist, “Improving Nutrient Removal while Reducing Energy Use at Three Swiss WWTPs Using Advanced Control,” Water Environment Research, Vol. 84, No. 2, 2012 pp. 170-188. doi:10.2175/106143011X13233670703684

 
 
Top