Back
 OJF  Vol.3 No.2 , April 2013
Evaluation of Durability Conferred by an Oleothermic Treatment on Chestnut and Douglas fir through Laboratory and in Field Tests
Abstract: The research evaluated two wood species, chestnut and Douglas fir, that are widespread in Tuscany, treated with an oleothermicprocess. Efficacy of this treatment against fungal decay was assessed through laboratory and field tests. The aim of this research was to investigate if an oleothermic process could add value to these natural resources when utilized in Use Class 4 (EN 335) for agricultural purposes such as vineyard poles. The treatment was effective on sapwood of both wood species in laboratory test, giving a protection similar to the untreated heartwood but in case of chestnut, it was easily washed away. In field test the leaching during the outdoor exposure reduced the resistance to fungal decay in both species.  
Cite this paper: Palanti, S. (2013). Evaluation of Durability Conferred by an Oleothermic Treatment on Chestnut and Douglas fir through Laboratory and in Field Tests. Open Journal of Forestry, 3, 66-69. doi: 10.4236/ojf.2013.32011.
References

[1]   Borksholt, E., & Henriksen, H. K. (1992). Guideline for EN 252: Field test method for determining the relative protective effectiveness of wood preservatives in ground contact NWPC Information No. 23/90 ISSN 0358-707X.

[2]   CEN EN 113 (1996). Wood preservatives. Test method for determining the protective effectiveness against wood destroying basidiomycetes. Determination of the toxic values. Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation.

[3]   CEN EN 252 (1989). Field test method for determining the relative protective effectiveness of a wood preservative in ground contact. Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation.

[4]   CEN EN 84 (1996). Wood preservatives. Accelerated ageing of treated wood prior to biological testing-Leaching procedure. Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation.

[5]   CEN EN 335 (2006). Durability of wood and wood-based products— Definition of use classes—Part 1: General. Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation.

[6]   CEN EN ISO 3696 (1996). Water for analytical laboratory use. Specification and test methods. Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation.

[7]   CEN EN 350-1 (1996). Durability of wood and wood-based products. Natural durability of solid wood. Guide to the principles of testing and classification of natural durability of wood. Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation.

[8]   CEN/TS 15083-1 (2005). Durability of wood and wood-based products Determination of the natural durability of solid wood against wooddestroying fungi, test methods. Part 1: Basidiomycetes. Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation.

[9]   Grenier, D., Bailleres, H., Meot J., Langbour, P., & Lanvin, J.-D. (2003). A study of water loss and oil adsorption during oleothermic treatment of wood. Proceeding of the 1st European Conference on Wood Modification, Belgium, 23-32.

[10]   Hughes, A. (2004). The tools at our disposal. Lisbon: Final Workshop Cost Action E22.

[11]   Militz, H., Krause, A., & Hof, C. (2004). Modified wood for window and cladding products. In A. Ceccotti (Ed.), Proceeding of International Symposium on Advanced Timber and Timber Composite Elements for Building, Florence: CNR-Ivalsa.

[12]   Palanti, S., & Susco, D. (2004). A new wood preservative based on heated oil treatment combined with triazole fungicides developed for above-ground conditions. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 54, 337-342. doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2004.04.003

[13]   Pernak, J., Zabielska-Mateljuc, J., Kropacs, A., & Foksowicz-Flaczyk, J. (2004). Ionic liquid in wood preservation. Holzforschung, 52, 286291.

[14]   Purlow, D.F. (1976). Result of field test on the natural durability of timber (1932-1975). Building Research Establishment Current Paper CP 6/76, Garston.

[15]   Sailer, M., & Rapp, A.O. (2001). Water repellency of some natural oil. Workshop and Meetings of European COST (Cooperation in the field of the Scientific and Technical Research). Action E22-Environmental Optimisation of Wood Protection. Reinbek.

[16]   Sanchez, D., Leinonen, A., Vesterinen P., Capaccioli, S., Gil, J., & Echeverria, I. (2005). Bio-south: Techno-economical assessment of production and use of biofuels for heating and cooling applications in south Europe. 14th European Biomass Conference, 17-21 October 2005, Paris.

[17]   Thevenon, M. F. (2001). Oils and water repellents in wood protection research and development in France. Reinbek: Workshop on Optimising treatment levels and managing environmental risks, Cost E22.

[18]   Treu, A., Militz, H., & Breyne, S. (2001). Royal treatment-scientific background and practical application. Reinbek: Workshop on Optimising Treatment Levels and Managing Environmental Risks, Cost E22.

[19]   Van Eckeveld, A., Homan, W., & Militz, H. (2001). Water repellency of some natural oil. Workshop and Meetings of European COST (Cooperation in the field of the Scientific and Technical research). Reinbek: Action E22-Environmental Optimisation of Wood Protection.

[20]   Vernois, M. (2001). Heat treatment of wood in France—State of art in rewiew on heat treatments of wood. In A. O. Rapp (Ed.), Proceeding of the Special Seminar COST E22, Antibes.

 
 
Top