This paper presents an assessment of the extent and conditions under which private financing can be a realistic approach for sanitation in slums. It is based on a cross-sectional study comparing two slum communities in East Africa, where 250 households from Bwaise III in Kampala, Uganda and 379 households from Temeke in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania were interviewed in 2010. Also, 10 key-informant interviews and 8 focus group discussions were conducted in addition to field observations. Findings show that majority (85%) of households used unimproved, private-shared pit latrines. These privately owned latrines had many structural shortfalls besides poor operation and maintenance while the public latrines provided by third-party were structurally sound but were under-utilized in residential slum neighorhoods. This is attributed to the presence free or at least cheaper alternatives which the community members preferred instead of paying per-visit user-fees. For the few who were willing to pay, willingness to pay was positively associated with the presence of a facility User committee and having been sensitized. In this context, a combination of these factors made cost recovery as well as operation and maintenance very minimal. The poor status of privately owned shared pit latrines matched the limited income levels of households. Similarly, cost recovery for public facilities was dependent on the number of users who were willing to pay: the more the users, the more the cost recovery. A combination of private and public financing is thus necessary to fund different but complementary aspects of sanitation in slums.
 Kulabako, N.R., Nalubega, M. and Thunvik, R. (2007) Study of the impact of land use and hydrogeological
settings on the shallow groundwater quality in a peri-urban area of Kampala, Uganda. Science of the
Total Environment, 381, 180-199. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.03.035
 Toubkiss, J. (2010) Meeting the sanitation challenge in sub-Saharan cities: Lessons learnt from a financial
perspective. In: van Vliet, B., Spaargaren, G. and Oosterveer, P., Eds., Social Perspectives on the Sanita
tion Challenge, Springer.
Netherlands, 163-176. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3721-3_10
 Isunju, J.B., Schwartz, K., Schouten, M.A., Johnson, W.P., and van Dijk, M.P. (2011) Socio-economic
aspects of improved sanitation in slums: A review. Public Health, 125, 368-376. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2011.
 Water Aid (2011) Sanitation and water for poor urban communities: A manifesto. Water Aid.
 Castro, J. (2010) Private-sector participation in water and sanitation services: The answer to public
sector failures? In: Ringler, C., Biswas, A.K. and Cline, S., Eds., Global Change: Impacts on Water
and food Security, Springer, Berlin, 169-193. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04615-5_9
 Mason, N., Tucker, J., Kingombe, C. and Kooy, M. (2011) Progress-linked finance: A study of the feasibility
and practicality of a proposed WASH financing approach. Water & Sanitation for the Urban Poor
(WSUP) and the Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London, 55.
 Thye, Y.P., Templeton, M.R. and Ali, M. (2011) A critical review of technologies for pit latrine emptying
in developing countries. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and
Technology, 41, 1793-1819. doi:10.1080/10643389.2010.481593
 Fonseca, C., Franceys, R., Batchelor, C., McIntyre, P., Klutse, A., Komives, K., Moriarty, P., Naafs, A., Nyarko,
K., Pezon, C., Potter, A., Reddy, R. and Snehalatha, M. (2010) Lifecycle costs approach: Glossary and cost components briefing note 1. IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, The Hague.
 Parkinson, J., Tayler, K., Colin, J. and Nema, A. (2008) A guide to decisionmaking: Technology options for
urban sanitation in India. Water and Sanitation Program-South Asia, World Bank, New Delhi.
 Günther, I., Horst, A., Lüthi, C., Mosler, H.J., Niwagaba, B.C. and Tumwebaze, K.I. (2011) Where do
Kampala’s poor “go”? An overview of urban sanitation conditions in Kampala’s informal settlement areas. In: Policy Brief NCCR-
SPLASH, Zürich/Dübendorf, ETH, Zürich.
 Schouten, M.A.C. and Mathenge, R.W. (2010) Communal sanitation alternatives for slums: A case study
of Kibera, Kenya. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/ B/C, 35, 815-822. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2010.07.002
 Kulabako, N.R., Nalubega, M., Wozei, E. and Thunvik, R. (2010) Environmental health practices,
constraints and possible interventions in Peri-urban Settlements: A review of Kampala, Uganda. International Journal of
Environmental Health Research, 20, 231-257. doi:10.1080/09603120903545745
 Eales, K. and Schaub-Jones, D. (2005) Sanitation partnerships: Landlord or tenant? In: Schaub-Jones,
D., Ed., The Importance of Rental Relationships to Poor Community Sanitation in 3 African Countries, BPD Sanitation Series, London.
 Wageindicator (2010) Minimum wages in Tanzania. WageIndicator Foundation. University of Amsterdam
 Foxon, K., Buckley, C., Brouckaert, C. and Bakare, B. (2011) How fast do pits and septic tanks fill up?
Implications for design and maintenance. Pollution Research Group, UKZN, Durban. http://www.afrisan.
 Hanchett, S., Akhter, S., Khan, M.H., Mezulianik, S. and Blagborough, V. (2003) Water, sanitation and
hygiene in Bangladeshi slums: An evaluation of the WaterAid-Bangladesh urban programme. Environment and
Urbanization, 15, 43-55. doi:10.1177/095624780301500219
 Eales, K. (2005) Sanitation partnership series: Bringing pit emptying out of the darkness: A comparison
of approaches in Durban, South Africa, and Kibera, Kenya. BPD Sanitation Series, London. http://www.bpdws.org/web/d/doc_131.
 Mudege, N. and Zulu, E. (2011) In their own words: Assessment of satisfaction with residential location
among migrants in Nairobi slums. Journal of Urban Health, 88, 219-234. doi:10.1007/s11524-010-9467-z
 Zulu, E., Beguy, D., Ezeh, A., Bocquier, P., Madise, N., Cleland, J. and Falkingham, J. (2011) Overview of
migration, poverty and health dynamics in Nairobi City’s slum settlements. Journal of Urban Health, 88, 185-199. doi:10.1007/s11
 Braun, B. and A?heuer, T. (2011) Floods in megacity environments: Vulnerability and coping strategies of slum dwellers in Dhaka/Bangladesh. Natural Hazards, 58, 771- 787. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9752-5