[1] Abdal-Haqq, I. (1995). Infusing technology into preservice teacher education. Eric Digest. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
[2] Anderson, R. D., & Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education, in handbook of research. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (p. 3-37). New York: Macmillan.
[3] Bhattacharyya, S., Mead, T., & Nathaniel, R. (2011). The influence of science summer camp on African-American high school students’ creer choice. Journal of School Science and Mathematics, 111, 345- 353. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00097.x
[4] Bhattacharyya, S., Volk, T., & Lumpe, A. (2009).The influence of an extensive inquiry-based field experience on pre-service elementary student teachers’ science teaching beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 199-218. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9129-8
[5] Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, S., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palinscar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8
[6] Blumenfeld, P. C., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35, 149-164. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3503_2
[7] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[8] Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27, 291- 315. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2703_3
[9] Coley, R. J., Cradler, J., & Engel, P. K. (1996). Computers and classrooms: The status of technology in US schools (Policy information report). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
[10] Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Introduction. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (Second ed., pp. 1-43). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
[11] Education Development Center, Inc. (2010). EDC annual report. URL (last checked 5 March 2013). http://www.edc.org/newsroom/annual_report/2010
[12] Ertmer, P. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 47-61. doi:10.1007/BF02299597
[13] Ertepinar, H., & Omer, G. (1996). Effect of instruction supplied with the investigative—Oriented laboratory approach on achievement in a science course. Journal of Educational Research, 38, 333-341. doi:10.1080/0013188960380306
[14] Gabbert, B., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1986). Cooperative learning, group-to-individual transfer, process gain and the acquisition of cognitive reasoning strategies. Journal of Psychology, 120, 265-278. doi:10.1080/00223980.1986.10545253
[15] Gagne, R. M. (1984). Learning outcomes and their effects: Useful categories of human performance. American Psychologist, 39, 377- 378. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.377
[16] Gardener, H. (1999). Multiple approaches to understanding. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[17] Grunwald Associates LLC. (2009). Deepening connection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, PBS STEM Education Resource Center. http://www.pbs.org/teachers/research
[18] Hall, L. D., Fisher, C., Musanti, S., & Halquist, D. (2006). Professional development in teacher education: What can we learn from PT3? Tech Trends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 50, 25-31.
[19] International Society for Technology in Education (1998). National educational technology standards for students. Eugene, OR: Author.
[20] Jaschik, S. (2010).Tenure rates and faculty mission. Inside Higher Education. URL (last checked April 27 2010). http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/04/27/brown
[21] Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1994). Learning together and alone. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
[22] Kimber, K., Pillay, H., & Richards, C. (2007). Techno literacy and learning: An Analysis of the Quality of Knowledge in Electronic. Representations of Understanding Computers and Education, 48, 59-79.
[23] Light, P., & Mevarech, Z. (1992). Cooperative learning with computers: An introduction. Learning and Instruction, 2, 155-159. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(92)90006-8
[24] Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., &Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 431-458. doi:10.1086/461870
[25] Means, B., & Olson, K. (Eds.) (1997). Technology and education reform. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, US Department of Education.
[26] National Center for Educational Statistics (2006). Pursuing Excellence. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
[27] NRC (National Research Council) (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
[28] Overbaugh, R., & Lu, R. (2008). The impact of a NCLB-EETT funded professional development program on teacher self-efficacy and resultant implementation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 43-61.
[29] Patton, M. Q. (Ed.) (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
[30] Peshkin, A. (1993). The goodness of qualitative research.Educational Researcher, 22(2), 23-29. doi:10.3102/0013189X022002023
[31] Rosaen, C. L., Hobson, S., & Khan, G. (2003). Making connections: Collaborative approaches to preparing today's and tomorrow’s teachers to use technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11, 281-306.
[32] Ryser, G. R, Beeler, J. E., & McKenzie, C. M. (1995). Effects of a computer-supported intentional learning environment (CSILE) on students’ self-concept, self-regulatory behavior, and critical thinking ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research 13, 375-385. doi:10.2190/XLGB-PXEC-BVXG-GRKN
[33] Schwab, J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab, & P. F. Brandwein, (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 1-103). New York: Simon and Schuster.
[34] Stein, S., McRobbie, C., & Ginns, I. (2001). A model for the professsional development of teachers in design and technology, 1999. URL (last checked 1 November 2001). http://www.aare.edu.au/99pap/ste99273.htm
[35] St. Pierre, E. A. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10, 175-189. doi:10.1080/095183997237278
[36] Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[37] Vannatta, R. A., & Beyerbach, B. (2000). Facilitating a constructivist vision of technology integration among education faculty and pres- service teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 132.
[38] Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.1037/11193-000
[39] Wenglinsky, H., & Silverstein, S. C. (2006). The science training teachers need. Educational Leadership, 64, 24-29.
[40] Willis, J. W., & Mehlinger, H. D. (1996). Information technology and teacher education. In J. T. J. Sikula, & E. Guyton, (Eds.) Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 978-1209). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
[41] Wright, V. H., & Wilson, E. K. (2007). A partnership of educators to promote technology integration: Design a master technology teacher program. Education, 128, 80-86.