AA  Vol.3 No.1 , February 2013
Conceptual and Methodological Issues of Poverty and Vulnerability: An Ethnographic Study from the South
Abstract: There is a great need to understand, analyse and critically apprise conceptual and methodological issues of poverty and vulnerability and its underlying relevance in the today’s fast changing rural/urban spaces of south India. To pursue this academic and epistemological endeavour, we tried to use the existing literature largely and later tried to relate it to our own regional case for argument and discussion. This has given us a scope to look at the issues and parameters involved to see how poverty and its contiguous factors reflect upon the real people’s lives and livelihoods of marginal groups in south India. Poverty should be seen in the form of loss of livelihoods, lack of access to resources, basic needs and non-availability of resources and services to the vulnerable sections of the society. Taking the case of Sugalis, one of the semi-nomadic tribe, of Rayalaseema region of south India it is argued in this paper that poverty and vulnerability coexist and strengthen each other and poverty can be understood by analyzing the real life situations and strategies adopted by the people to manage their lives. Present Paper based on an empirical research by using anthropological tools of research.
Cite this paper: Kasi, E. (2013). Conceptual and Methodological Issues of Poverty and Vulnerability: An Ethnographic Study from the South. Advances in Anthropology, 3, 38-45. doi: 10.4236/aa.2013.31006.

[1]   Bankoff, G., Geprge F., & Dorothea, H. (2004). Mapping vulnerability, Sterling: Earthscan.

[2]   Baulch, B., & Hoddinott, J, (2000). Economic mobility and poverty dynamics in developing countries. Journal of Development Studies, 36, 1-24. doi:10.1080/00220380008422652

[3]   Bird, K., Hulme, D., Moore, K., & Shepherd, A. (2002). “Chronic Poverty and Remote Rural Areas” Institute for development policy and management. CPRC Working Paper No 13, Manchester: University of Manchester.

[4]   Broch-Due, V. (1995). Poverty and prosperity: Local and global perspectives. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, Occasional Paper No. 1.

[5]   Booth, D., Melissa, L., & Alison, T. (1999). Experiencing poverty in Africa: Perspectives from anthropology. World Bank Poverty Status Report Background Paper 1(b).

[6]   Banerjee, S., Angana, P. C., Lubna, N. C., Manali, D., Saadia, T., & Kamala, V. (2004). Engendering violence: Boundaries, histories, and the everyday. In A. P. Chatterji, & L. N. Chaudhry (Eds.), Gendered violence in South Asia: Nation and community in the postcolonial present, cultural dynamics: Theory cross-cultures, 16, 125-139.

[7]   Bhukya, B. (2010). Subjugated nomads: The Lambadas under the rule of the Nizams. Hyderabad: Orient BlackSwan.

[8]   Chatterji, A. P. (1998). Toward an ecology of hope. Community and joint forest management in Orissa. Sweden: Scandisconsult Natura AB; Berkeley: Asia Forest Network.

[9]   Chatterji, A. P. (2001). Postcolonial research as relevant practice (Postmodern research methods forum). TAMARA: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science, 1, 1-13.

[10]   Devereux, S. (2001). Livelihood insecurity and social protection: A re-emerging issue in rural development. Development Policy Review, 19, 507-519. doi:10.1111/1467-7679.00148

[11]   Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

[12]   Goody, J. (1971). The developmental cycle in domestic groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[13]   Guru, G., & Geetha, V. (2000). New phase of dalit-bahujan intellectual activity. Economic and Political Weekly, 35, 130-134.

[14]   Henninger, N. (1998). Mapping and geographic analysis of human welfare and poverty review and assessment. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.

[15]   Hulme, D., Moore, K., & Shepherd, A. (2001). Chronic poverty: Meanings and analytical framework. CPRC Working Paper 2, Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.

[16]   Human Development Report (2000). Human Development Report 2000. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

[17]   Ilaiah, K. (2009). Post-Hindu India: A discourse on Dalit-Bahujan, socio-spiritual and scientific revolution. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

[18]   Indian Social Institute (1988). The five year plan system. New Delhi: Indian Social Institute.

[19]   Kasi, E. (2011a). Poverty and development in a marginal community: Case study of a settlement of the Sugali Tribe in Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 46, 5-18. doi:10.1177/0021909610388480

[20]   Kasi, E. (2009b). Poverty and vulnerability among tribal people: A case of Sugalis. In: Kasi, E., & Malik, R. C. (Eds.), Theory and practice of ethnography: Readings from the periphery (pp. 337-354). Jaipur and New Delhi: Rawat Publications.

[21]   Kasi, E. (2009). Role of NGO in the development of Sugalis: Case study of a settlement in Andhra Pradesh. Human Ecology, 27, 115122.

[22]   Kasi, E. (2008). Poverty and development in a marginal community: Case study of a settlement of the Sugali tribe in Andhra Pradesh, India. South Asian Anthropologist, 8, 83-93.

[23]   Kasi, E. (2010). Fighting drought in the era of globalization: Programmes and schemes in Anantapur District of Andhra Pradesh. In M. C. Behere, & J. Basar (Eds.), Developing the marginalised: Emerging issues and concerns (pp. 189-208). New Delhi: Commonwealth.

[24]   Kasi, E. (2007). An anthropological study of Livelihoods: The case of two Sugali settlements from Anantapur District of Andhra Pradesh. Un-published PhD thesis, Hyderabad: University of Hyderabad.

[25]   Kothari, U. (2002). Migration and chronic poverty. CPRC Working Paper 16, Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.

[26]   Kozel, V., & Parker, B. (2001). Poverty in rural India: The contribution of qualitative research in poverty. Washington: World Bank.

[27]   Lanjouw, P., & Stern, N. (1991). Poverty in Palanpur. The World Bank Economic Review, 5, 23-55. doi:10.1093/wber/5.1.23

[28]   Mani, D. (2001). Vulnerability analysis and asset mnagement. United Nations Centre for Regional Development (UNCRD).

[29]   Mehta, A. K., & Shah, A. (2001). Chronic poverty in India: Overview study. CPRC Working Paper 7. Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.

[30]   Mehta, A. K., & Shah, A. (2003). Chronic poverty in India: Incidence, causes and policies. World Development, 31, 491-511. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00212-7

[31]   Moser, C. (1998). The asset vulnerability framework: Reassessing urban poverty reduction strategies. World Development, 26, 1-19. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(97)10015-8

[32]   Oliver-Smith, A. (1996). Anthropological research on hazards and disasters. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 303-328. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.303

[33]   Pritchett, L., Asep, S., & Sudarno, S. (2000). Quantifying vulnerability to poverty: A proposed measure, applied to Indonesia. Policy Research Working Paper 2437, Washington: The World Bank.

[34]   Rao, V. P. (2004). Dimensions of transformations in tribal societies with reference to Andhra Pradesh, New Delhi: Sarup and Sons.

[35]   Reddy, B. K. (1991). Forests and the Sugalis in Andhra Pradesh: Historical and anthropological perspective. Man in India, 71, 611-619.

[36]   Sainath, P. (1996). Everybody loves a good drought. New Delhi: Penguin.

[37]   Sah, D. C., & Sisodia, Y. S. (2004). Editors introduction. In D. C. Sah, & Y. S. Sisodia (Eds.), Tribal issues in India (pp. 15-36), Ujjain: MPISSR; Jaipur: Rawat Publications.

[38]   Sankaran, S. R. (2000). Welfare of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in independent India—An overview of state policies and programmes. Journal of Rural Development, 19, 507-537.

[39]   Saxena, N. C. (2000a). How have the poor done? Mid-term review of the Ninth Plan. Economic and Political Weekly, 35, 3627-3630.

[40]   Schwegler, T., & Michael, G. P. (2008). Unruly experts: Methods and forms of collaboration in the anthropology of public policy. Anthropology in Action: Journal for Applied Anthropology in Policy and Practice, 15, 1-9. doi:10.3167/aia.2008.150201

[41]   Sinha, S., & Lipton, M. (1999). Damaging fluctuations, risk and poverty: A review. Background Paper for the World Development Report 2000/2001, Sussex: Poverty Research Unit, University of Sussex.

[42]   Smith, K. (1996). Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster. London: Routledge.

[43]   Social Education and Development Society (2004). Annual report of Social Education and Development Society, 2002-2004. Donor Agencies.

[44]   Tudawe, I. (2002). Chronic poverty and development policy in Sri Lanka: Overview study. CPRC Working Paper No. 9, Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.

[45]   UNDP (1997). India: The road to human development. New Delhi: United Nations Development Programme.

[46]   Unnikrishnan, N. (2000). Press and people: A manual of human rights reporting in India, 2000-2001. URL (last checked 11 October 2012).

[47]   Wisner, B. (1993). Disaster vulnerability: Scale, power and daily life. Geo-Journal, 30, 127-140. doi:10.1007/BF00808129

[48]   World Bank (2000). World Development Report 2000/2001 attacking poverty. Washington DC: World Bank.

[49]   World Bank (2000). World Development Report 2000/2001, Preventing Famines: The local press matters. Washington DC: World Bank.