Effect of closed circuits drip irrigation system and lateral lines length on growth, yield, quality and water use efficiency of soybean crop

Mohamed Yousif  Tayel; Hani Abdel-Ghani  Mansour; Sabreen Khalil  Pibars

doi:10.4236/as.2013.42014

Mohamed Yousif Tayel, Hani Abdel-Ghani Mansour, Sabreen Khalil Pibars

Abstract: Field experiment was conducted for one growing season (2012) in clay loam soil at the Experimental Farm of Faculty of Agriculture, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC), USA on soybean crop to study the effect of: 1) the closed drip irrigation system: closed circuits with one and two a manifolds for lateral lines (CM1DIS; CM2DIS) and traditional drip irrigation system (TDIS) as a control; and 2) lateral lines length (LLL): LLL1, LLL2 and LLL3 (40, 60,80 m) on soybean growth, yield, oil, protein content and water use efficiency. Plants were drip irrigated every 4 days. N, K2O and P2O5 fertilizers were added via irrigation water. Data obtained could be outlined as follows: 1) According to the mean values of soybean crop growth (leaf area; plant height), yield (grain and straw), both oil and protein content and water use efficiency, the treatment used could be ranked in the following ascending orders: TDIS < CM1DIS < CM2DIS and LLL3 < LLL2 < LLL1; 2) Differences in the means of the studied data among treatments used were significant at the 1% level; 3) The effects of the DIC × LLL on the data obtained were significant at the 1 % level; And 4) the highest values of the obtained data and the lowest ones were achieved in the following interactions: CM2DIS × LLL1; TDIS × LLL3, respectively.

Keywords: Closed Circuits; Drip Irrigation; Lateral Lines; Soybean; WUE

Cite this paper: Tayel, M. , Mansour, H. and Pibars, S. (2013) Effect of closed circuits drip irrigation system and lateral lines length on growth, yield, quality and water use efficiency of soybean crop. Agricultural Sciences, 4, 85-90. doi: 10.4236/as.2013.42014.

References

[1] Fao (1979) Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 33, 193.

[2] Harrison, K.A. (2009) Irrigation survey. Cooperative Ex tension Service, College of Agricultural and Environ mental Sciences, The University of Georgia, Tifton. http://www.nespal.org/sirp/agwateruse/facts/survey/.%5C2009.0122.IrrSurvey08%20misc%20pub.pdf

[3] United States Department of Agriculture—National Ag riculture Statistics Service, 2009. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/

[4] Dogan, E., Kirnak, H. and Copur, O. (2007) Deficit irri gations during soybean reproductive stages and CROP GRO-soybean simulations under semi-arid climatic con ditions. Field Crops Research, 103, 154-159. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.05.009

[5] Sincik, M., Candogan, B.N., Demirtas, C., Büyükacangaz, H., Yazgan, S. and Goksoy, A.T. (2008) Deficit irrigation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in a sub-humid cli mate. Journal of Agronmy and Crop Science, 194, 200-205. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00307.x

[6] Bajaj, S., Chen, P., Longer, D.E., Shi, A., Hou, A., Ishibashi, T. and Brye, K.R. (2008) Irrigation and planting date effects on seed yield and agronomic traits of early maturing soybean. Journal of Crop Improvement, 22, 47-65. doi:10.1080/15427520802042937

[7] Gercek, S., Boydak, E., Okant, M. and Dikilitas, M. (2009) Water pillow irrigation compared to furrow irrigation for soybean production in a semi-arid area. Agricultural Wa ter Management, 96, 87-92. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2008.06.006

[8] Mansour, H.A. (2012) Design considerations for closed circuits of drip irrigation system. Ph.D. Thesis, Ain Shams University, Cairo.

[9] Tayel, M.Y., Mansour, H.A. and Lightfoot, D. A. (2012) Effect of different closed circuits and lateral line lengths on pressure head and friction loss. Agriculture Science Journal, 3, 392-399.

[10] Tayel, M.Y., Mansour, H.A. and Lightfoot, D. A. (2012) Effect of different closed circuits and lateral line lengths on flow velocity and velocity head. Agriculture Science Journal, 3, 531-537.

[11] Tayel, M.Y., Mansour, H.A. and El-Gindy, A.M. (2012) Effect of different closed circuits and lateral line lengths on dripper and lateral discharge. Journal of Applied Sci ences Research, 8, 2725-2731.

[12] Tayel, M.Y., Mansour, H.A. and El-Gindy, A.M. (2012) Effect of different closed circuits and lateral line lengths on uniformity coefficient and coefficient of variation. Jour nal of Applied Sciences Research, 8, 2741-2748.

[13] Gee, G.W. and Bauder, J.W. (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute, I.I., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 383-412.

[14] Klute, A. (1986) Moisture retention. In: Klute, A. Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis, Soil Science Society of Amer ica, Madison, 635-662.

[15] Rebecca, B. (2004) Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil Survey Laboratory Investigations Report, No. 42.

[16] Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.A., Raes, D. and Smith, M. (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 56, 293.

[17] Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. (1980) Principles and pro cedures of statistics. A biometrical approach. 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Tokyo.