SM  Vol.3 No.1 , January 2013
Global Environmental Coordination: How to Overcome the Double Collective Action Problematic?
Author(s) Jan-Erik Lane*
ABSTRACT

The need for stronger global coordination of environmental policies has become ever more obvious, but there are no formal arrangements in sight. The UN framework of UNEP is not delivering effective policies. Only global environmental coordination on the successful model of the World Band and the IMF can stem the rising emissions numbers and projections—quantitative voting reflecting the differences in size between the states of the world. However, the system of weighted voting typical of the WB and the IMF must be reformed in an egalitarian manner, when a global ecology organisation is set up, reducing their excessive voting power disparities. This paper suggests a simple but effective mechanism for reducing these voting power disparities, decreasing all member country votes by either the square root or the cube root expression.


Cite this paper
Lane, J. (2013). Global Environmental Coordination: How to Overcome the Double Collective Action Problematic?. Sociology Mind, 3, 83-88. doi: 10.4236/sm.2013.31013.
References
[1]   Attfield, R. (1997). The ethics of the global environment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

[2]   Balmford, A. (2002). Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science, 297, 950-953. doi:10.1126/science.1073947

[3]   Bhagwati, J. (2004). Defense of globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.

[4]   Bryant, R. C. (2008). Reform of quota and voting shares in the international monetary fund: “Nothing” is temporarily preferable to an inadequate “Something”. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.

[5]   Chang, H.-J. (2001). Joseph Stiglitz and the world bank: The rebel within. London: Anthem Press.

[6]   Chapin, F. S., Erika, S. Z., Valerie, T. E., Rosamond, L. N., Peter, M. V., Heather, L. R., David, U. H., Sandra, L., Osvaldo, E. S., Sarah, E. H., Michelle, C. M., & Sandra, D. (2002). Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 405, 234-242. doi:10.1038/35012241

[7]   Coleman, J. S. (1971). Control of collectivities and the power of a collectivity to act. In Lieberman (Ed.), Social choice (pp. 277-287). New York: Gorden and Breach. Reprinted in Coleman, J. S. (1986). Individual interests and collective actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

[8]   Coleman, J. S. (1998). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U.P.

[9]   Costanza, R., Ralph d’Arge, Rudolf de Groot, Stephen, F., Monica, G., Bruce, H., Karin, L., Shahid, N., Robert, V. O., Jose, P., Robert, G. R., Paul, S., & Marjan, van den B. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260. doi:10.1038/387253a0

[10]   EIA (2010). Energy information administration. http://www.eia.doe.gov/

[11]   Felsenthal, D., & Machover, M. (1998). The measurement of voting power. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

[12]   Global footprint network: Global footprint. (http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/footprint_basics_overview/

[13]   Jones, K. (2009). The doha blues: Institutional crisis and reform in the WTO. London: Zed Books.

[14]   Leech, D., & Leech, R. (2012). A new analysis of a priori voting power in the IMF: Recent quota reforms give little cause for celebration. Warwick Economic Research Papers.

[15]   Meyer, J. W., David, J. F., Ann, H., Evan, S., & Nancy, B. T. (1997). The structuring of a world environmental regime, 1870-1990. International Organization, 4, 623-651. doi:10.1162/002081897550474

[16]   Nordhaus, W. D. (2007). A review of the stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45, 686-702. doi:10.1257/jel.45.3.686

[17]   Nunes, P., & van den Bergh, C. J. M. (2001). Economic valuation of biodiversity: Sense or nonsense?” Ecological Economics, 2, 203-222. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00233-6

[18]   Raustiala, K. (1997). States, NGOs and international environmental institutions. International Studies Quarterly, 4, 719-740. doi:10.1111/1468-2478.00064

[19]   Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

[20]   Rosendal, G. K. (1995). The convention on biological diversity: A viable instrument for conservation and sustainable use?” In H. Bergenson, G. Parmann, & O. B. Thommessen (Eds.), Green globe year book of international co-operation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[21]   Sala, O. E., Chapin III, F. S., Armesto, J. J., Eric, B., Janine, B., Rodolfo, D., Elisabeth, H.-S., Laura, F. H., Robert, B. J., Ann, K., Rik, L., David, M. L., Harold, A. M., Martín, O., Poff, N. L., Martin, T. S., Brian, H. W., Marilyn, W., & Diana, H. W. (2000). Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287, 1770-1774. doi:10.1126/science.287.5459.1770

[22]   Serra, N., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2008). The Washington consensus reconsidered: Towards a new global governance. Oxford: Oxford U.P.

[23]   Singer, P. (2002). One world: The ethics of globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

[24]   Steger, D. S. (2009). Redesigning the World Trade Organization for the 21st century. Waterloo, ON: The Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) and Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

[25]   Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change (the stern review). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge U.P.

[26]   Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.

[27]   Stiglitz, J., Ocampo, J. A., Spiegel, S., Ffrench-Davis, R., & Nayyar, D. (2006). Stability with growth: Macroeconomics, liberalization and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[28]   Stiglitz, J. E. (2007). Making globalisation work. The next steps to global justice. New York: Penguin.

[29]   Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Freefall: Free markets and the sinking of the global economy. London and New York: Allen Lane.

[30]   Stiglitz, J. E., & Charlton, A. (2007). Fair trade for all. Oxford: Oxford U.P.

[31]   Taylor, P. W. (1986). Respect for nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[32]   Tol, R. (2002a). Estimates of damage costs of climate change. Part I: Benchmark estimates. Environmental and Resource Economics, 21, 47-73. doi:10.1023/A:1014500930521

[33]   Tol, R. (2002b). Estimates of damage costs of climate change. Part II: Dynamic estimates. Environmental and Resource Economics, 21, 135-160. doi:10.1023/A:1014539414591

[34]   Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

[35]   Weitzman, M. L. (2007). A review of the stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45, 703-724. doi:10.1257/jel.45.3.703

 
 
Top