[1]   Baker, D. (2011). The politics of neurodiversity: Why public policy matters. Denver: Lynne Rienner.

[2]   Boote, J., Baird, W., & Beecroft, C. (2010). Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: A narrative review of case examples. Health Policy, 95, 10-23. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.007

[3]   Brooks, M. (2009). Thirteen things that don’t make sense: The most baffling scientific mysteries of our time. New York: Random House.

[4]   Bumiller, K. (2009). The geneticization of autism: From new reproductive technologies to the conception of genetic normalcy. Signs, 34, 875-899. doi:10.1086/597130

[5]   David, P. A. (2008). The historical origins of “open science”: An essay on patronage, reputation and common agency contracting in the scientific revolution. Capitalism and Society, 3. doi:10.2202/1932-0213.1040

[6]   Driscoll, C., Lambert, K. F., Chapin III, F. S., Nowak, D., Spies, T. A., Swanson, F. J. et al. (2012). Science and society: The role of long-term studies in environmental stewardship. Bioscience, 62, 354-366. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.4.7

[7]   Drolet, B. C., & Lorenzi, N. M. (2010). Translational research: Understanding the continuum from bench to bedside. Translational Research, 157, 1-5.

[8]   Felt, U., & Fochler, M. (2008). The bottom-up meanings of the concept of public participation in science and technology. Science and Public Policy, 21, 17-35.

[9]   Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1998). Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 3-21. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1988.tb02045.x

[10]   Grinker, R. R. (2008). Unstrange minds: Remapping the world of autism. Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books.

[11]   Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2009). Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy, 33, 553-560. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2008.12.002

[12]   Juntti, M., Duncan, R., & Turnpenny, J. (2009). Evidence, politics and power in public policy for the environment. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 207-125. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2008.12.007

[13]   Kenslen, H. (1951). Science and politics. The American Political Science Review, 14, 641-661.

[14]   Kim, Y. S., Leventhal, B. L., Yun-Joo, K., Fombonne, E., Laska, E., Lim, E.-C. et al. (2011). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in a total population sample. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 904-912. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10101532

[15]   Kingdon, J. (2010). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, update edition, with an epilogue on health care (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

[16]   Konefal, J., & Hatanaka, M. (2011). Enacting third-party certification: A case study of science and politics in organic shrimp certification. Journal of Rural Studies, 27, 125-133. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.12.001

[17]   Kuhn, T. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions: 50th anniversary edition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

[18]   McIvor, D. (2010). The politics of speed: Connolly, wolin, and the prospects for democratic citizenship in an accelerated polity. Polity, 43, 58-83. doi:10.1057/pol.2010.23

[19]   McRuer, R., & Berube, M. F. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press.

[20]   Oreskes, N. (2011). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscurred the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsburry Press.

[21]   Pielke, R. A. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511818110

[22]   Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of nature: Why violence has declined. New York: Viking Penguin.

[23]   Roberts, N. C., & King, P. J. (1991). Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2, 147-175.

[24]   Silverstein, L. B., & Auerbach, C. (2003). Qualitative data. New York: NYU Press.

[25]   Silverstein, R. (2010). Anatomy of change: The need for effective disability policy change agents. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 173-177. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.002

[26]   Skloot, R. (2011). The immortal life of henrietta lacks. New York: Crown Publishers.

[27]   Stace, H. (2011). Moving beyond love and luck: building right relationships and respecting lived experience in New Zealand autism policy. Wellington: University of Victoria.

[28]   Stone, D. (2001). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (revised edition). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

[29]   Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan. New York: Random House.

[30]   Tijssen, R. J. (2010). Discarding the “basic science/applied science” dichotomy: A knowledge utilization triangle classification system of research journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1842-1852. doi:10.1002/asi.21366

[31]   Trickett, S. B., Trafton, J. G., & Schun, C. D. (2009). How do scientists respond to anomalies? Different strategies used in basic and applied science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 711-729. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01036.x