AJIBM  Vol.3 No.1 , January 2013
Product Ethnicity between the Hammer of Identity and the Anvil of Globalization
Abstract: With the globalization of markets, the multinational production made obvious great strides marked by the proliferation of hybrid or bi-national products. In this context which supported the dissolution of identity of several products’ categories and called in question the weight of origin labels about the consumer behavior purchase. Beyond these reflections, this article proposed to wonder about the relation between globalization and product ethnicity, by analyzing the apparent effects of the current context of globalization on the establishment of stereotypic country-products associations by the consumers. Also, the question which is directed to the development and the presentation of this research is the following one: to what extend does the current context of globalization enable us to call in question the phenomenon of product ethnicity?
Cite this paper: J. Nabil and Z. Imed, "Product Ethnicity between the Hammer of Identity and the Anvil of Globalization," American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2013, pp. 86-90. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2013.31011.

[1]   M. Roth and J. B. Rome, “Matching Product Category and Country Image Perceptions: A Framework for Managing Country-of-Origin Effects,” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1992, pp. 477-497.

[2]   Kühn and Weiss, “The Brand Image of Switzerland, a Chance for the Companies,” Economic Life: Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 6, 2003, p. 56.

[3]   J.-C. Usunier, “Product Ethnicity: An Exploratory Approach,” Decision Marketing, No. 27, 2002, pp. 35-49.

[4]   J. R. Rossiter and A. M. Chan, “Ethnicity in Business and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 42, No. 2, 1998, pp. 127-134. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00113-6

[5]   P. Wade, “Race and Ethnicity in Latin America,” Pluto Press, London, Sterling, 1997.

[6]   E. Cunin, “Ethnicity Revisited by the Globalization,” Autrepart, Vol. 38, 2006, pp. 3-13.

[7]   C. Reierson, “Attitude Changes toward Foreign Products,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1967, pp. 385-387. doi:10.2307/3149879

[8]   J.-C. Usunier and G. Cestre, “Product Ethnicity: Revisiting the Match between Products and Countries,” Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2007, pp. 32-72. doi:10.1509/jimk.15.3.32

[9]   M. Koromyslov, “Impact of Luxury Delocalization on the Consumer’s Attitudes: The Case of the French Luxury Houses,” Thesis of Doctorate in Sciences of Management, Administration Institute of the Companies, University Nancy II, Nancy, 2009.

[10]   P. Gabriel and B. Urien, “Values of Consumption and Territorial Origin of the Products,” Decisions Marketing, Vol. 43, No. 44, 2006, pp. 41-54.

[11]   J.-C. Usunier and J. A. Lee, “Marketing across Cultures, 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2005.

[12]   A. Nagashima, “A Comparative ‘Made-In’ Product Image Survey among Japanese Businessmen,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41, No. 3, 1977, pp. 95-100. doi:10.2307/1250943

[13]   F. Smaoui, “Perceived Origin Effect of the Brand Name on Consumer’s Perceptions: Case of Emerging Countries Consumer,” 8th International Congress Marketing Trends, Paris, 16-17 January 2009, pp. 32-72.

[14]   R. Ettenson and G. Gaeth, “Commentary: Consumer Perceptions of Hybrid (Bi-National) Products,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1991, pp. 13-18. doi:10.1108/07363769110035117

[15]   I. Phau and G. P. Prendergast, “Tracing the Evolution of Country of Origin Research: In Search of New Frontiers,” Journal of International Marketing and Exporting, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1999, pp. 71-83.

[16]   G. Schweiger, T. Otter and A. Strebinger, “The Influence of Country of Origin and Brand on Product Evaluation and the Implications Thereof for Location Decisions,” CEMS Business Review, Vol. 2, 1997, pp. 5-26.

[17]   S. Samiee, “Customer Evaluation of Products in a Global Market,” Journal of International Business, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1994, pp. 579-604.