CE  Vol.3 No.8 B , December 2012
Cogniton-based Enlightenment of Creative Thinking: Examplars in Computer Science
ABSTRACT
It is reputed that “Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration”, but it can also be noted that “sometimes, 1% inspiration is more important than 99% perspiration.” As this 1% is so important, can it be understood, and even learned? If so, how can cognition be used to enlighten a scientist's inspiration (creative thinking)? Both questions are considered on the basis of cognitive theory in the paper. We illustrate our ideas with examples from computer science.

Cite this paper
Cheng, Z. & Jin, S. (2012). Cogniton-based Enlightenment of Creative Thinking: Examplars in Computer Science. Creative Education, 3, 90-94. doi: 10.4236/ce.2012.38B020.
References
[1]   De Bono, E. (2008). How to have creative idea: 62 games to develop the mind. Publisher: Vermi-lion.

[2]   Bernard, C. (1865). An introduction to the study of experimental medicine (English translation). Macmillan & co. New York, 1927.

[3]   Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454.

[4]   Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688.

[5]   Silvia, P. J. (2008). Creativity and in-telligence revisited: A reanalysis of Wallach and Ko-gan (1965). Creativity Research Journal, 20, 34-39.

[6]   Gl?scher J., Rudrauf D., Colom R., Paul L. Tranel K., D., Damasio H., & Adolphs R. (2010). The distributed neural system for general intelligence revealed by lesion mapping. In Proceedings of the Na-tional Academy of Sciences.

[7]   Witelson S. F., Ki-gar D. L., & Harvey T. (1999). The exceptional brain of Albert Einstein. Lancet, 353, 2149-2153.

[8]   Broadbent, D. E. (1987). Perception and communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[9]   von Neumann, J. (1945). First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC.

[10]   Mooney G. A., Fewtrell R. F., & Bligh J. G. (1999). Cognitive process modelling: computer tools for creative thinking and managing learning. Medical Teacher, 21(3), 277-280

[11]   Wallas, G. (1926). Art of Thought.

[12]   Perkins, DN (1981) The Mind's Best Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[13]   Ram A., Wills L., Domeshek E., Nersessian N., &Kolodner J.(1995). Understanding the Creative Mind. AI Journal, 79, 111-128.

[14]   Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87-98.

[15]   Gabora, L. (2002). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 126-133), UK.

[16]   Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107-120.

[17]   Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A. & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of Creativity. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press.

[18]   Williams, H. L., Conway, M. A., & Cohen, G. (2008). Autobiographical memory. Memory in the Real World (3rd ed., pp. 21-90). Hove, UK: Psychol-ogy Press.

[19]   Atkinson, R.C.; Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Proceedings of The psychology of learn-ing and motivation (2, pp. 89-195). New York: Aca-demic Press.

[20]   Humphreys P. (2004). Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[21]   Graham-Rowe, D. (2005). Mission to build a simulated brain begins. NewScientist.

[22]   Aldo A., Lex W., & Ganter B.. (2003) Conceptual Structures for Knowledge Creation and Communication, LNAI 2746, 16-36.

[23]   Xu K., Li H., Zhang H., Cohen-Or D., Xiong Y., & Cheng Z.-Q. (2010). Style-Content Separation by Anisotropic Part Scales. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 29(6), 184:1-184:10.

[24]   Bermúdez. J. L. (2010). Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Science of the Mind. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.

 
 
Top