TEL  Vol.2 No.5 , December 2012
Global Relative Prices in the Face of a Pollution Transfer Problem
Author(s) John Dogbey*
ABSTRACT

This study focuses on the relationship between trade and relative prices of pollution intensive goods. Seminal to this idea is the transfer problem. It is based on the idea that environmental quality of two countries that engage in trade could be affected and this could also have possible environmental quality transfer effects in a third country (geographic neighbors or trade partners) and a result, terms of trade effects. The paper makes the case that whether the relative price of a pollutant would suffer during trade will depend on the kind of pollutant it is, distance between the countries involved, countries’ marginal propensity to consume and substitutability of the good. The nature of the pollutant (whether it is spatially separable in production and or consumption) determines whether it can spillover to trade neighbors or whether it is transferable to a trade partner with ramifications to its relative price. The paper uses indirect utility functions and compensated demand functions to analyze the terms of trade effects.


Cite this paper
J. Dogbey, "Global Relative Prices in the Face of a Pollution Transfer Problem," Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol. 2 No. 5, 2012, pp. 557-560. doi: 10.4236/tel.2012.25102.
References
[1]   G. Grossman and A. Krueger, “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement,” NBER Working Paper Series, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1991.

[2]   H. X. Huang and W. Labys, “Modeling Trade and Environmental Linkages in China,” International Journal of Global Issues, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2004, pp. 242-266. doi:10.1504/IJGENVI.2004.006053

[3]   G. Grossman and A. Krueger, “Economic Growth and the Environment,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 112, No. 3, 1995, pp. 353-377.

[4]   K. E. McConnell, “Income and the Demand for Environmental Quality,” Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1997, pp. 383-399. doi:10.1017/S1355770X9700020X

[5]   N. Khanna, “The Income Elasticity of Non-point Source Air Pollutants: Revisiting the Environmental Kutznets Curve,” Economic Letters, Vol. 77, No. 3, 2002, pp. 387-392. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00153-2

[6]   N. Khanna and F. Plassmann, “The Demand for Environmental Quality and the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 51, No. 3-4, 2004, pp. 225-236. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.005

[7]   S. Bandyopadhyay and B. Majumdar, “Multilateral Transfers, Export Taxation and Asymmetry,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 73, No. 2, 2004, pp. 715-725. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.05.001

[8]   S. Bandyopadhyay and J. Munemo, “Transfers, Trade, Taxes and Endogenous Capital Flows: With Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa,” International Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2006, pp. 29-40.

[9]   J. Bhagwati, R. Brecher and T. Hatta, “The General Theory of Transfers and Welfare: Bilateral Transfers in a Multilateral World,” American Economic Review, Vol. 73, 1983, pp. 606-618.

[10]   J. Bhagwati and R. Brecher, “Foreign Ownership and the Theory of Trade and Welfare,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89, No. 3, 1981, pp. 497-511. doi:10.1086/260982

[11]   J. Bhagwati and R. Brecher, “Immiserizing Transfers from Abroad,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 13, No. 3-4, 1982, pp. 353-364. doi:10.1016/0022-1996(82)90063-0

 
 
Top