CE  Vol.3 No.7 , November 2012
Construction of A Creative Instructional Design Model Using Blended, Project-Based Learning for College Students
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to construct a blended, project-based learning creative instructional design model for university students that responds to the demands of the digital age, enhances student learning achievements in creativity, and cultivates student creative ability in independent thinking and innovation. This study organizes and analyzes blended learning, project-based learning, and the literature on creativity to summarize creative instructional design indicators for blended project-based learning, and it uses the fuzzy Delphi method for expert questionnaire analysis to filter the indicators most suited to university students. This study proposes that the four dimensions of creative instructional design are the following: 1) creative character traits; 2) ability in the creative process; 3) innovative product design, and 4) an instruc- tional environment for creativity, with a total of 23 design indicators. Based on the results of the expert questionnaire analysis and evaluation mechanisms, the levels of importance and primary consideration indicators of the design indicators are established. The results show that incorporation of creative instructional design in blended, project-based learning can sufficiently cover the content of the four dimensions of creativity and that this approach gains the approval of most experts. This instructional design model can be used as an indicator for creativity learning effect assessment of university students, as a basis for creative instructional design by teachers, and as a reference for creativity curricular planning in university engineering colleges. This model can effectively enhance student creativity learning effects and, in turn, achieve the objective of an overall elevation of national competitiveness.

Cite this paper
Lou, S. , Chung, C. , Dzan, W. & Shih, R. (2012). Construction of A Creative Instructional Design Model Using Blended, Project-Based Learning for College Students. Creative Education, 3, 1281-1290. doi: 10.4236/ce.2012.37187.
References
[1]   Akkoyunlu, B., & Y?lmaz-Soylu, M. (2008). Development of a scale on learners’ views on blended learning and its implementation process. The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 26-32. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.12.006

[2]   Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “the social psychology of creativity”. Boulder: Westview Press.

[3]   Barron, F., & Harringtion, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255

[4]   Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Lawrence Erlbaum.

[5]   Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom. The creativity Research Handbook, 83-114.

[6]   Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

[7]   Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9, 458- 467. doi:10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458

[8]   Dewey, J. (1906). The experimental theory of knowledge. Mind, 15, 293- 307. doi:10.1093/mind/XV.59.293

[9]   Fleith, D. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22, 148-153. doi:10.1080/02783190009554022

[10]   Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1997). The cognitive psychology of school learning. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.

[11]   Gilchrist, M. (1972). The psychology of creativity. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

[12]   Gowan, J. C. (1972). Development of the creative individual. RR Knapp.

[13]   Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27-51. doi:10.1080/10400418809534285

[14]   Hsiao, H. C. (1997). The improvement of creativity and productivity of technical workers through partnership between university and industry. Paper Presented at the International Conference on Creativity Development in Technical Education and Training, Taipei.

[15]   Klir, G. J., & Folger, T. A. (1988). Fuzzy sets, uncertainty, and information.

[16]   Labuske, K., & Streb, J. (2008). Technological creativity and cheap labour? Explaining the growing international competitiveness of German mechanical engineering before World War I. German Economic Review, 9, 65-86. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0475.2008.00422.x

[17]   Lou, S. J., Chung, C. C., Chao, L. C., Tseng, K. H., & Shih, R. S. (2012). Construction of a blended TRIZ creative learning platform. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 37-47.

[18]   Lubart, T., & Sternberg, R. (1995). Defying the crowd. Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: Free Press.

[19]   Maisuria, A. (2005). The turbulent times of creativity in the National Curriculum. Policy Futures in Education, 3, 141-152. doi:10.2304/pfie.2005.3.2.3

[20]   Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[21]   Michaela, D. (2001). Fostering creativity in business education: Developing creative classroom environments to provide students with critical workplace competencies. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 28-33. doi:10.1080/08832320109599667

[22]   Mortera-Gutiérrez, F. (2006). Faculty best practices using blended learning in e-learning and face-to-face instruction. International Journal on E Learning, 5, 313.

[23]   Noorderhaven, N. G. (1995). Strategic decision making. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.

[24]   Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4, 227-233.

[25]   Polman, J. L. (1998). Activity structures for project-based teaching and learning: Design and adaptation of cultural tools. Paper Presented at the CA: Annual Meeting of AERA, San Diego.

[26]   Procter, C. (2003). Blended learning in practice. Education in a changing environment. Salford: University of Salford.

[27]   Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.

[28]   Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. Psychology: A Study of a Science, 3, 184-256.

[29]   Sala-i-Martin, X., Blanke, J., Hanouz, M. D., Geiger, T., & Mia, I. (2010). The global competitiveness index 2010-2011: Looking beyond the global economic crisis. The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011.

[30]   Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.251

[31]   Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.

[32]   Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.

[33]   Treffinger, D. J., County, V., Gifted, N. S. L. T. I. O. T., & Talented, T. (1980). Encouraging creative learning for the gifted and talented: A handbook of methods and techniques. Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office.

[34]   Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Stead-Dorval, K. B. (2005). Creative problem solving: An introduction. Prufrock Pr.

[35]   Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. London: Cape.

[36]   Wu, J. J. (2002). Enticing the crouching tiger and awakening the hidden dragon: Recognizing and nurturing creativity in Chinese students. Development and Practice of Creativity, Taipei.

[37]   Zimmerman, E. (2006). It takes effort and time to achieve new ways of thinking: Creativity and art education. The International Journal of Arts Education, 3, 74-87.

 
 
Top