Back
 SGRE  Vol.3 No.4 , November 2012
Cost and Emissions Implications of Coupling Wind and Solar Power
Abstract: We assess the implications on long-run average energy production costs and emissions of CO2 and some criteria pollutants from coupling wind, solar and natural gas generation sources. We utilize five-minute meteorological data from a US location that has been estimated to have both high-quality wind and solar resources, to simulate production of a coupled generation system that produces a constant amount of electric energy. The natural gas turbine is utilized to provide fill-in energy for the coupled wind/solar system, and is compared to a base case where the gas turbine produces a constant power output. We assess the impacts on variability of coupled wind and solar over multiple time scales, and compare this variability with regional demand in a nearby load center, and find that coupling wind and solar does decrease variability of output. The cost analysis found that wind energy with gas back-up has a lower levelized cost of energy than using gas energy alone, resulting in production savings. Adding solar energy to the coupled system increases levelized cost of energy production; this cost is not made up by any reductions in emissions costs.
Cite this paper: S. Blumsack and K. Richardson, "Cost and Emissions Implications of Coupling Wind and Solar Power," Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, Vol. 3 No. 4, 2012, pp. 308-315. doi: 10.4236/sgre.2012.34041.
References

[1]   NREL, “Wind Technologies Market Report,” 2010. www1.eere.energy.gov/wind/pdfs/51783.pdf

[2]   US DOE, “20% Wind Energy by 2030: Transmission and Integration into the US Electric System,” 2008. http://www.20percentwind.org/Final_DOE_Executive_Summary.pdf

[3]   A. Fernandez, S. Blumsack and P. Reed, “Evaluating Wind-Following and Ecosystem Services for Hydroelectric Dams,” Center for Research in Regulated Industries Eastern Conference, Skytop, May 2011.

[4]   E. Fertig and J. Apt, “Economics of Compressed Air Energy Storage to Integrate Wind Power: A Case Study in ERCOT,” Energy Policy, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2011. pp. 23302342. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.049

[5]   E. Hittinger, J. Whitacre and J. Apt, “Compensating for Wind Variability Using Co-Located Natural Gas Generation and Energy Storage,” Energy Systems, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2010, pp. 417-439. doi:10.1007/s12667-010-0017-2

[6]   NREL, “Wind Energy Resource Atlas of the United States,” Renewable Resource Data Center (RReDC) Home Page, 2002. http://rredc.nrel.gov/wind/pubs/atlas/appendix_A.html

[7]   University of Oklahoma, Environmental Verification and Analysis Center. http://www.ocgi.okstate.edu/owpi/Oksolarmap.gif

[8]   Idaho National Laboratory, “Wind Turbine Power Curve Data,” 2012. http://www.inl.gov/wind/software/

[9]   J. Apt, “The Spectrum of Power from Wind Turbines,” Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2007, pp. 369-374. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.02.077

[10]   FERC, “Form 714-Pre-Electronic Filing Data: 1993-2004,” Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 2011. http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/forms/form-714/data.asp

[11]   Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center, “The Smart Grid: Sorting the Reality from the Hype,” 2009. http://www.cmu.edu/electricity

[12]   Price data from US Energy Information Administration, 2012. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_dcu_nus_m.htm

[13]   W. Katzenstein and J. Apt, “Air Emissions Due to Wind and Solar Power,” Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2009, pp. 253-258. doi:10.1021/es801437t

[14]   A. Mills, R. Wiser, M. Milligan and M. O’Malley, “Comment on ‘Air Emissions Due to Wind and Solar Power’,” Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 43, No. 15, 2009, pp. 6106-6107. doi:10.1021/es900831b

[15]   S. Stoft, “Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity,” Piscataway, IEEE, 2002.

[16]   Energy Information Administration, “Updated Capital Cost Estimates for Electricity Generation Plants,” 2011. http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/beck_plantcosts/pdf/updatedplantcosts.pdf

 
 
Top