ABSTRACT The rise of inequality in China is one of the most serious social problems in the reform era in China. Previous studies have debated the relative importance of human capital, political capital, and other factors in determining personal income. Using a new dataset from 2006 China General Social Survey (CGSS, 2006), the first author replicates earlier tests to measure whether the market or state has more impact on incomes as a way to the competing hypotheses related to human versus political capital. The results of the ordinary least squares regression analysis show no significance in party membership, state ownership, and work experience, while the first author does find high returns to education, which supports Nee’s market transition theory. Moreover, the findings indicate that market sectors, including domestic private enterprises and foreign enterprises have remarkable advantages in earnings, and there is a great income gap between different regions, sectors, and within the sectors. To summarize, the market and state play a dual role in determining income in transitional urban China.
Cite this paper
Wu, Q. , Goetz, B. , Hartmann, D. & Wang, Y. (2012). Income Inequality in Transitional Urban China: The Effect of Market versus State. Sociology Mind, 2, 373-381. doi: 10.4236/sm.2012.24049.
 Bian, Y. (1994). Work and inequality in urban China. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
 Bian, Y., & Logan, J. R. (1996). Market transition and the persistence of power: The chaning stratification system in urban China. American Sociological Review, 61, 739-758. doi:10.2307/2096451
 Bian, Y., Shu, X., & Logan, J. R. (2001). Communist party membership and regime dynamics in China. Social Forces, 79, 805-841.
 Guan, X. (2001). Globalization, inequality and social policy: China on the threshold of entry into the World Trade Organization. Social Policy and Administration, 35, 242-257.
 Hauser, S., & Xie, Y. (2005). Temporal and regional variation in earnings inequality: Urban China in transition between 1988 and 1995. Social Science Research, 34, 44-79.
 Lewis, W. A. (1976). Development and distribution. In A. Cairncross, & M. Puri (Eds.), Employment, income distribution and development strategy. London: Macmillan.
 National Bureau Statistics (2006). China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.
 Nee, V. (1989). A theory of market transition: From redistribution to markets in state socialism. American Sociological Review, 54, 663- 681. doi:10.2307/2117747
 Rona-Tas, A. (1994). The first shall be last? Entrepreneurship and communist cadres in the transition from socialism. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 40-69. doi:10.1086/230499
 Tang, W., & Parish, W. L. (2000). Chinese urban life under reform: The changing social contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Victor, N., & Cao, Y. (1999). Path dependent societal transformation: Stratification in hybrid mixed economies. Theory and Society, 28, 799-834. doi:10.1023/A:1007074013540
 Wang, F. (2008). Boundaries and categories: Rising inequality in post-socialist urban China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
 Wu, X. (2006). Communist cadres and market opportunities: Entry into self-employment in China, 1978-1996. Social Force, 85, 389-411.
 Wu, X., & Treiman, D. J. (2004). The household registration system and social stratification in China: 1955-1996. Demography, 41, 363-384. doi:10.1353/dem.2004.0010
 Wu, X., & Xie, Y. (2003). Does the market pay off? Earnings Returns to education in urban China. American Sociological Review, 68, 425-442. doi:10.2307/1519731
 Xie, Y., & Hannum, E. (1996). Regional variation in earnings inequality in reform-era urban China. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 950-992. doi:10.1086/230785
 Xie, Y., & Wu, X. (2008). Danwei profitability and earnings inequality in urban China. The China Quarterly, 1, 558-581.
 Xinhua (2004). Survey of Chinese officials’ opinions on reform: Beijing Daily. Xinhua News Bulletin.
 Zhou, X. (2000). Economic transformation and income inequality in urban China: Evidence from panel data. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1135-1174. doi:10.1086/210401