Cite this paper
Carboni, N. (2012) Advocacy and Policy Change in the Multilevel System of the European Union: A Case Study within Health Policy. Open Journal of Political Science
, 32-44. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2012.23005
 Anderson, P. (2009). The new old world. London: Verso.
 Bryant, T. (2002). Role of knowledge in public health and health promotion policy change. Health Promotion International, 17, 89-98.
 Carboni, N. (2009). Advocacy groups in the multilevel system of the EU: A case study in health policy-making. OSE Paper Series, Research Paper 1, 1-35.
 Cram, L. (1993). Calling the tune without paying the piper: Social policy regulation: The role of the commission in European Union social policy. Policy and Politics, 21, 135-146.
 Cram, L. (1997). Policy-making and the integration process implications for integration theory. London: Routledge.
 European Public Health Alliance (2008). Pharmaceutical package: Better but far from perfect. Brussels: European Public Health Alliance Press Release.
 Greer, S. (2006). Uninvited europeanization: Neofunctionalism and the EU in health policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 134-152. doi:10.1080/13501760500380783
 Greer, S., & Vanhercke, B. (2009). Healthcare and the EU: The hard politics of soft law. In E. Mossialos, R. Baeten, & T. Hervey (Eds.), Health system governance in Europe: The role of EU law and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Héritier, A. (2007). Explaining institutional change in Europe. Oxford, OH: Oxford University Press.
 Jenkins-Smith H. C., & Sabatier, P. (1993). Policy change and learning. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
 Jenkins-Smith H. C., & Sabatier, P. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117-166). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
 Laffan, B. (1997). From policy entrepreneur to policy manager: The challenge facing the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 4, 422-438. doi:10.1080/13501769780000081
 Lamping, W. (2005). European integration and health policy: A peculiar relationship. In M. Steffen (Ed.), Health governance in Europe. Issues, challenges, and theorie (pp. 18-48). London: Routledge.
 Leibfried, S., & Pierson, P. (2000). Social policy. Left to courts and markets? In H. Wallace and W. Wallace (Eds.), Policy making in the European Union (pp. 273-293). Oxford, OH: Oxford University Press.
 Mossialos, E., Permanand, G., Baeten, R., & Harvey, T. (2009). Health systems governance in Europe: The role of EU law and policy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
 Mossialos, E., & Permanand, G. (2005a). Constitutional asymmetry and pharmaceutical policy-making in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 687-609.
 Mossialos, E., & Permanand, G. (2005b). The europeanization of regulatory policy in the EU pharmaceutical sector. In M. Steffen (Ed.), Health governance in Europe: Issues, challenges and theories (pp. 49-80). London and New York: Routledge.
 Sabatier, P. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5, 98-130.
 Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2005). Comparing policy networks: Marine protected areas in California. Policy Studies Journal, 33, 161-180.
 Scharpf, F. (2000). Institutions in comparative policy research. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 762-790.
 Smith, A. (2000). Policy networks and advocacy coalitions: Explaining policy change and continuity in UK industrial pollution policy? Brighton and Hove: University of Sussex.
 Vanhercke, B. (2009). Against the odds. The open method of coordination as a selective amplifier for reforming Belgian pension policies. In S. Kr?ger (Ed.), What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research (pp. 1-18). European Integration online Papers. http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-016a.htm
 Vogt, W. (1999). Dictionary of statistics and methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences. London: Sage.
 Weible, C. M. (2007). An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California marine protected area policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 95-117.