IIM  Vol.4 No.5 A , October 2012
A Study on Forecasting System of Patent Registration Based on Bayesian Network
ABSTRACT
Recently the importance of intellectual property has been increased. There has been various ways of research on analy- sis of companies, forecast of technology and so on through patents and many investments of money and time. Unlike traditional method of patent analysis such as company analysis, forecasting technologies, this research is to suggest the ways to forecast registration and rejection of patents which help minimize the efforts to register patents. To do so, in- formation such as inventors, applicants, application date, and IPC codes were extracted to be used as input variables for analyzing Bayesian network. Especially, among various forms of Bayesian network, we used Tree Augmented NBN (TAN) to forecast registration and rejection of patent. This is because, TAN was assumed to have dependence between variables. As a result of this Bayesian network, it was shown that there are nearly more than 80% of accuracy to fore- cast registration and rejection of patents. Therefore, we expect the minimization of time and cost of registration by forecasting registration and rejection of R&D patent through this research.

Cite this paper
G. Kim, S. Park, S. Jun, Y. Kim, D. Kang and D. Jang, "A Study on Forecasting System of Patent Registration Based on Bayesian Network," Intelligent Information Management, Vol. 4 No. 5, 2012, pp. 284-290. doi: 10.4236/iim.2012.425040.
References
[1]   C. H. Lee, “States of AMOLED Display Technology,” Optical Science & Technology, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2012, pp. 29-35.

[2]   W. H. Cho, “2012 Second-Half Outlook Report,” KDB Daewoo Securities Research Center, 2012, pp. 1-29.

[3]   Korea Intellectual Property Office, “Patent and Information Analysis,” 2007, pp. 46-58.

[4]   K. Henning and T. Ulrike, “Chinese Regional Innovation Systems in Times of Crisis: The Case of Guangdong,” Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2009, pp. 101-128.

[5]   Y. H. Tseng, C. J. Lin and Y. I. Lin, “Text Mining Techniques for Patent Analysis,” Information Processing & Management, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2007, pp. 1216-1247.

[6]   B. W. Lin, C. J. Chen and H. L. Wu, “Predicting Citation to Biotechnology Patent based on the Information from the Patent Documents,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2007, pp. 87-100.

[7]   S. H. Jun, S. S. Park and D. S. Jang, “Technology Forecasting using Matrix Map and Patent Clustering,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 115, No. 5, 2012, pp. 786-807. doi:10.1108/02635571211232352

[8]   W. G. Jung, S. S. Park and D. S. Jang, “Patent Registration Prediction Methodology Using Multivariate Statistics,” IEICE Transactions of Information and Systems, Vol. 94, No. 11, 2011, pp. 2219-2226. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.099

[9]   C. H. Kim, S. P. Park and Y. H. Ko, “Strategic Management of Intellectual Property,” Korea Invention Promotion Association, Seoul, 2011.

[10]   A. A. Aljumah, M. G. Ahamad and M. K. Siddiqui, “Predictive Analysis on Hypertension Treatment Using Data Mining Approach in Saudi Arabia,” Intelligent Information Management, Vol. 3, No. 6, 2011, pp. 252-261. doi:10.4236//iim.2011.36031

[11]   D. Heckerman, “A Tutorial on Learning with Bayesian Networks,” Microsoft Research Advanced Technology Division Microsoft Corporation, Washington, 1995.

[12]   J. Y. Lee and Y. J. Choi, “Network Identification of Major Risk Factor Associated with Delirium by Bayesian Network,” The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2011, pp. 323-333.

[13]   A. M. Carvalho, A. L. Oliveira and M. F. Sagot, “Efficient Learning of Bayesian Network Classifiers: An Extension to the TAN Classifier,”AI’07 Proceedings of the 20th Australian joint conference on Advances in artificial intelligence, 2007, pp. 16-25.

[14]   Korea Institute of Patent Information, “Patent Analysis Method for Technology Roadmap,” 2005, pp. 93-95.

[15]   L. Soete and S. Wyatt, “The Use of Foreign Patenting as an Internationally Comparable Science and Technology Output Indicator,” Scientometrics, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1983, pp. 31-54. doi:10.1007//BF02097176.

 
 
Top