[1] Armstrong, S. (2004). The impact of supervisors’ cognitive styles on the quality of research supervision in management education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 599-616.
[2] AVCC (Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee) (1990). The progress of higher degree students. Canberra: Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee.
[3] Cullen, D. J. (1989). A future for postgraduate study at the Australian national university. Canberra: Australian National University Postgraduate and Research Students’ Association.
[4] Davis, B. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[5] DEST (2007). Research quality framework: Assessing the quality and impact of research in Australia, RQF submission specifications. Department of Education, Science and Training.
[6] Dev, P. C. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and academic achievement: What does their relationship imply for the classroom teacher? Remedial and Special Education, 18, 12-19. doi:10.1177/074193259701800104
[7] Glass, R., (2000). An assessment of systems and software engineering scholars and institutions. Journal of Systems and Software, 54, 77-82.
[8] Heath, T. (2002). A quantitative analysis of PhD students’ views of supervision. Higher Education Research and Development, 21, 42- 57. doi:10.1080/07294360220124648
[9] Kam, B. H. (1997). Style and quality in research supervision: The supervisor dependency factor. Springer: Higher Education.
[10] Karimi, R., & Khan, S. (2007). Key elements towards academic success for non-traditional students in a pharmacy school. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3, 427-430.
[11] Lai, R. (1992). Teaching protocol engineering in honours year. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 640, 143-156.
[12] Lai, R. (1994a). A network engineering major embedded in a computer systems engineering degree. Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Information Technology in Training and Education. Brisbane
[13] Lai, R. (1994b). Teaching communication protocol development using formal method. Journal of Academic Computing and Information Systems, 1, 38-47.
[14] LTU (2006). La Trobe University handbook for candidates and supervisors for masters degrees by research and doctoral degrees.
[15] Ryan, R., & Decci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
[16] Sathye, M. (2005). Supervisory practice: A qualitative study. Qualitative Social Research, 6
[17] Sharma, N., & Lai, R. (1995). Quality assurance for honours project. Journal of Academic Computing and Information Systems, 2, 27-33.
[18] Sinclair, M. (2004). The pedagogy of “good” supervision: A national cross-disciplinary investigation of PhD supervision. Department of Education, Science and Training.
[19] Sommerville I. (2010). Software engineering (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.