[1] Angelo, T. A. (1991). Classroom research: Early lessons from success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[2] Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques—A handbook for college-teachers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
[3] Ballentyne, R., Borthwick, J., & Packer, J. (2000). Beyond student evaluation of teaching: Identifying and addressing academic staff development needs. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 211-236.
[4] Barnett, R. (2007). Assessment in Higher Education. In D. Boud, & N. Falchicov (Eds.), Re-thinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 29-40). London: Routledge Taylor and Francis.
[5] Biggs, J. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Hawthorn, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.
[6] Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students’ learning process really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 3-19. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01038.x
[7] Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7-74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
[8] Catlin, A., & Kalina, M. (1993). What Is the Effect of the Cross/Angelo Model of Classroom Assessment on Student Outcome? A Study of the Classroom Assessment Project at Eight California Community Colleges. Sacramento, CA: California Community College Chancellor’s Office.
[9] Chadwick, K., & Ward, J. (1987). Determinants of consumer satisfaction with education: Implications for college & university administrators. College and University, 2, 236-246.
[10] Coaldrake, O. P., & Stedman, L. (1998). On the brink: Australia’s universities confronting their future. St. Lucia, Qld: University of Queensland Press.
[11] Collis, B. (1996). Tele-learning in a Digital World: The future of distance learning. London: International Thomson Computer Press.
[12] Covington, M. V. (1997). A motivational analysis of academic life in college. In R. P. Perry, & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp. 61-100). New York: Agathon Press.
[13] Cross, P., & Steadman, M. (1996). Classroom Research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[14] Dochy, F., & McDowell, L. (1997). Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, 279-298. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(97)86211-6
[15] Dweck, C. (1999). Self-Theories: their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
[16] Enerson, D. N., Plank, K. M., & Johnson, R. N. (2007). An Introduction to Classroom Assessment Techniques. University Park, Pennsylvania: Penn State.
[17] National Teaching and Learning Forum (1998). Classroom assessment techniques (2nd ed.). New York: Jossey-Bass. www.ntlf.com/html/lib/bib/assess.htm
[18] Freeman, R., & Lewis, R. (1998). Planning and implementing assessment. London: Kogan Page.
[19] Gibbs, G. (2006). Why assessment is changing. In C. Bryan, & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 11-22). Abingdon: Routledge.
[20] Henderson, T. (2001). Classroom assessment techniques in asynchronous learning networks. The Technology Source.
[21] Juwah, C., Macfarlane-Dick, D., Matthew, B., Nicol, D., Ross, D., & Smith, B. (2004). Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. The Higher Education Academy. URL (last checked 12 October 2012).
[22] Laurillard, D. (1996). How should UK Higher Education Make Best Use of New Technology? Glasgow: Association for Learning Technology.
[23] Lowman, J., & Mathie, V. A. (1993). What should graduate teaching assistants know about teaching? Teaching of Psychology, 20, 84-88. doi:10.1207/s15328023top2002_4
[24] Markett, C., Sanchez, I. A., Weber, S., & Tangney, B. (2006). Using short message service to encourage interactivity in the classroom. Computers & Education, 46, 280-293. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.014
[25] Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluation of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253-388. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2
[26] Martin, M. B. (2011). Classroom Assessment Techniques Designed for Technology. URL (last checked 29 August 2012).
[27] Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On Qualitative Differences in Learning-1: Outcome and process. British Journal of Education Psychology, 46, 4-11. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
[28] Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3, 1-6. doi:10.1080/08923648909526659
[29] Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199-218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
[30] Norton, L. S., Tilley, A. J., Newstead, S. E., & Franklyn-Stokes, A. (2001). The pressures of assessment in undergraduate courses and their effect on student behaviors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 269-284. doi:10.1080/02602930120052422
[31] Perry, R. P. (1997). Teaching effectively: Which students? What methods? In R. P. Perry, & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: research and practice (pp. 154-170). New York: Agathon Press.
[32] Platt, M. (1993). What student evaluations teach. Perspectives in Political Science, 22, 29-40. doi:10.1080/10457097.1993.9944516
[33] Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203413937
[34] Shelvin, M., Banyard, P., Davies, M., & Griffiths, M. (2000). The validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education: Love me, love my lectures? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 397-405. doi:10.1080/713611436
[35] Stefani, L., & Nicol, D. (1997). From teacher to facilitator of collaborative enquiry. In S. Armstrong, G. Thompson, & S. W. Brown (Eds.), Facing up to radical changes in universities and colleges (pp. 131-140). London: Kogan Page.
[36] Swartz, C. W., White, K. P., & Stuck, G. B. (1990). The factorial structure of the North Carolina teacher performance appraisal instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 175-185. doi:10.1177/0013164490501021