[1] Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 3-38. doi:10.1007/BF01326548
[2] Baker, L. (2002). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C. C. Block, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research- based best practices (pp. 77-95). New York: Guilford Press.
[3] Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
[4] Baumann, J. F., Jones, L. A., & Seifert-Kessell, N. (1993). Monitoring reading comprehension by thinking aloud. Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center, University of Georgia.
[5] Block, C., & Israel, S. (2004). The ABCs of performing highly effective think-alouds. The Reading Teacher, 58, 154-167. doi:10.1598/RT.58.2.4
[6] Brown, A. L. (1985). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In H. Singer, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed. 501-526). Newark: International Reading Association.
[7] Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from text. Educational Researcher, 10, 14- 21. doi:10.3102/0013189X010002014
[8] Byrnes, J. P. (2001). Cognitive development and learning in instructional contexts (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
[9] Carifio, J. (1975). A standard and command-wide model for developing scientific and technical instructional materials. Alexandria, VA: United States Office of Naval Research.
[10] Carifio, J. (1977). Toward a macro model of instructional components. Annual Meeting of Eastern Educational Research Association, MA: Boston.
[11] Carifio, J. (2003). An instructional text evaluation protocol. Annual Conference of the New England Educational Research Organization, NH: Portsmouth.
[12] Carifio, J. (2005). Towards a standard integrated information processing/cognitive model of learning. The 8th Biennial Conference of the International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Group. England: Leeds.
[13] Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1996). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A model for linguistically diverse classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 259-273. doi:10.1086/461827
[14] Dagostino, L., & Carifio, J. (1994a). Evaluative Reading and Literacy: A Cognitive View. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
[15] Dagostino, L., & Carifio, J. (1994b). Establishing the logical validity of instructional activities for teaching reading evaluatively. Journal of Reading Improvement, 31, 14-22.
[16] Erikson, L. (2006). An integrated approach to citizenship education for grades 1-8 in the 21st century. Ed.D. Thesis. Lowell, University of Massachusetts.
[17] Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research on Teaching, 20, 3-56.
[18] Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.34.10.906
[19] Flores, M. (2005). Instructional strategies, conditions, characteristics, and contexts for successfully teaching Hispanic Caribbean students. Ed.D. Thesis. Lowell, University of Massachusetts.
[20] Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
[21] Garner, R. (1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60, 517-529. doi:10.3102/00346543060004517
[22] Glaser, R., & Chi, M. T. (1988). Overview. In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 15-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[23] Griffith, P. L., & Ruan, J. (2005). What is metacognition and what should be its role in literacy instruction? In S. E. Israel, C. C. Block, K. L. Bauserman, & K. Kinnucan-Welsch (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction, and professional development (pp. 3-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[24] Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunloky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[25] Hartman, H. J. (2001). Teaching metacognitively. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 149-172). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[26] Israel, S., & Massey, D. D. (2005). Think alouds as a means for building metacognition with middle schoolers. In C. C. Block, S. E. Israel, K. Kinnucan-Welsch, & K. L. Bauserman (Eds.), Metacognition and literacy learning (pp. 183-199). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[27] Jones, R. C. (2007). Making sense in social studies: What? How? When? http://www.readingquest.org/conditional.html
[28] Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[29] Kwong, B. (2008). The development and validation of a research-based, tiered new teacher induction program guide for Massachusetts public schools. Ed.D. Thesis. Lowell, University of Massachusetts.
[30] Massey, D. D. (2003). A comprehension checklist: What if it doesn’t make sense? The Reading Teacher, 57, 81-84.
[31] Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1, 894-904. doi:10.2307/2084615
[32] Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
[33] Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y. & Wixson, K. K. (1994). Becoming a strategic reader. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 788-811). Newark: International Reading Association.
[34] Pellitier, P. (2004). Towards a reader-text-context theoretical model for reading literary work. Ed.D. Thesis. Lowell, University of Massachusetts.
[35] Perla, R. J. (2006). Use and augmentation of a formal model and theory to develop instructional material to teach undergraduates about the nature of science, scientific knowledge and scientific change. Ed.D. Thesis. Lowell, University of Massachusetts.
[36] Perla, R., & Carifio, J. (2011). Theory creation, modification, and testing: An information-processing model and theory of the anticipated and unanticipated consequences of research and development. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 7, 84-110.
[37] Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup, & S. J. Samuel (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 291-309). Newark: International Reading Association. doi:10.1598/0872071774.13
[38] Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1987). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. Annals of Child Development, 4, 89-129.
[39] Raphael, T. E. (1986). Teaching question answer relationships. The Reading Teacher, 39, 516-522.
[40] Reynolds, R. E. (1992). Selective attention and prose learning: Theoretical and empirical research. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 345-391. doi:10.1007/BF01332144
[41] Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1989). Memory development between 2 and 20. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9717-5
[42] Squire, L. R. (1987). Memory and brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
[43] Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[44] Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.