[1]   Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 3-38. doi:10.1007/BF01326548

[2]   Baker, L. (2002). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C. C. Block, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research- based best practices (pp. 77-95). New York: Guilford Press.

[3]   Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.

[4]   Baumann, J. F., Jones, L. A., & Seifert-Kessell, N. (1993). Monitoring reading comprehension by thinking aloud. Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center, University of Georgia.

[5]   Block, C., & Israel, S. (2004). The ABCs of performing highly effective think-alouds. The Reading Teacher, 58, 154-167. doi:10.1598/RT.58.2.4

[6]   Brown, A. L. (1985). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In H. Singer, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed. 501-526). Newark: International Reading Association.

[7]   Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from text. Educational Researcher, 10, 14- 21. doi:10.3102/0013189X010002014

[8]   Byrnes, J. P. (2001). Cognitive development and learning in instructional contexts (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

[9]   Carifio, J. (1975). A standard and command-wide model for developing scientific and technical instructional materials. Alexandria, VA: United States Office of Naval Research.

[10]   Carifio, J. (1977). Toward a macro model of instructional components. Annual Meeting of Eastern Educational Research Association, MA: Boston.

[11]   Carifio, J. (2003). An instructional text evaluation protocol. Annual Conference of the New England Educational Research Organization, NH: Portsmouth.

[12]   Carifio, J. (2005). Towards a standard integrated information processing/cognitive model of learning. The 8th Biennial Conference of the International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Group. England: Leeds.

[13]   Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1996). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A model for linguistically diverse classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 259-273. doi:10.1086/461827

[14]   Dagostino, L., & Carifio, J. (1994a). Evaluative Reading and Literacy: A Cognitive View. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

[15]   Dagostino, L., & Carifio, J. (1994b). Establishing the logical validity of instructional activities for teaching reading evaluatively. Journal of Reading Improvement, 31, 14-22.

[16]   Erikson, L. (2006). An integrated approach to citizenship education for grades 1-8 in the 21st century. Ed.D. Thesis. Lowell, University of Massachusetts.

[17]   Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research on Teaching, 20, 3-56.

[18]   Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.34.10.906

[19]   Flores, M. (2005). Instructional strategies, conditions, characteristics, and contexts for successfully teaching Hispanic Caribbean students. Ed.D. Thesis. Lowell, University of Massachusetts.

[20]   Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

[21]   Garner, R. (1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60, 517-529. doi:10.3102/00346543060004517

[22]   Glaser, R., & Chi, M. T. (1988). Overview. In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 15-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

[23]   Griffith, P. L., & Ruan, J. (2005). What is metacognition and what should be its role in literacy instruction? In S. E. Israel, C. C. Block, K. L. Bauserman, & K. Kinnucan-Welsch (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction, and professional development (pp. 3-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[24]   Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunloky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[25]   Hartman, H. J. (2001). Teaching metacognitively. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 149-172). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

[26]   Israel, S., & Massey, D. D. (2005). Think alouds as a means for building metacognition with middle schoolers. In C. C. Block, S. E. Israel, K. Kinnucan-Welsch, & K. L. Bauserman (Eds.), Metacognition and literacy learning (pp. 183-199). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

[27]   Jones, R. C. (2007). Making sense in social studies: What? How? When? http://www.readingquest.org/conditional.html

[28]   Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

[29]   Kwong, B. (2008). The development and validation of a research-based, tiered new teacher induction program guide for Massachusetts public schools. Ed.D. Thesis. Lowell, University of Massachusetts.

[30]   Massey, D. D. (2003). A comprehension checklist: What if it doesn’t make sense? The Reading Teacher, 57, 81-84.

[31]   Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1, 894-904. doi:10.2307/2084615

[32]   Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

[33]   Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y. & Wixson, K. K. (1994). Becoming a strategic reader. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 788-811). Newark: International Reading Association.

[34]   Pellitier, P. (2004). Towards a reader-text-context theoretical model for reading literary work. Ed.D. Thesis. Lowell, University of Massachusetts.

[35]   Perla, R. J. (2006). Use and augmentation of a formal model and theory to develop instructional material to teach undergraduates about the nature of science, scientific knowledge and scientific change. Ed.D. Thesis. Lowell, University of Massachusetts.

[36]   Perla, R., & Carifio, J. (2011). Theory creation, modification, and testing: An information-processing model and theory of the anticipated and unanticipated consequences of research and development. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 7, 84-110.

[37]   Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup, & S. J. Samuel (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 291-309). Newark: International Reading Association. doi:10.1598/0872071774.13

[38]   Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1987). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. Annals of Child Development, 4, 89-129.

[39]   Raphael, T. E. (1986). Teaching question answer relationships. The Reading Teacher, 39, 516-522.

[40]   Reynolds, R. E. (1992). Selective attention and prose learning: Theoretical and empirical research. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 345-391. doi:10.1007/BF01332144

[41]   Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1989). Memory development between 2 and 20. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9717-5

[42]   Squire, L. R. (1987). Memory and brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

[43]   Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

[44]   Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.