Back
 SS  Vol.3 No.10 , October 2012
Comparison of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in Bile Duct Imaging
Abstract: Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in diagnosing bile duct pathologies. Materials and Methods: We documented the data of 171 patients with both ERCP and MRCP between January 2009 and December 2010 at the Konya Education and Research Hospital. Results: Of the 171 patients, 100 (58.5%) were female and 71 (41.5%) were male. The median age was 63 (55 to 89). ERCP was used to diagnose bile duct stones in 102 (59%) patients, bile duct tumour in 14 (8%) patients, hydatic cysts opening up to the bile duct in 4 (2%) patients and bile duct stenosis in 3 (1.8%) patients. For the detection of bile duct stones, MRCP had a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 74% and a diagnostic accuracy of 83%. For bile duct tumours, MRCP had a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 98% and a diagnostic accuracy rate of 92%. Conclusion: In our centre, the results of MRCP and ERCP were similar for the last two years. However, MRCP was superior with respect to diagnosis as it was cheaper and non-invasive. Thus, ERCP should be preferred for therapeutic processes.
Cite this paper: M. Eryılmaz, Ö. Karahan, İ. Tolu, A. Okuş, S. Ay, B. Sevinç and A. Halıcı, "Comparison of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in Bile Duct Imaging," Surgical Science, Vol. 3 No. 10, 2012, pp. 489-493. doi: 10.4236/ss.2012.310097.
References

[1]   E. Eludokuz, E. Tankurt, H. Akbaylar, E. Igci, O. Dicle, I. Simsek, et al., “The Sensitivity of Ultrasonography in Cases Choledocholithiasis Diagnosed with ERCP,” Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Gastroenterohepatology, Vol. 7, 1996, pp. 108-110.

[2]   P. D. Prabhakar, A. M. Prabhakar, H. B. Prabahakar and D. Sahani, “Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography of Benign Disorders of the Biliary System,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2010, pp. 497-514. doi:10.1016/j.mric.2010.08.007

[3]   G. Ersoz, “Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Bile Duct Disorders,” Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol. 3, 2007, pp. 12-16.

[4]   H. Senturk, B. Canbakan and E. Ozden, “ERCP: Indications and Risks,” Series of Clinical Approach in Gastroenterology, Vol. 30, 2004, pp. 101-109.

[5]   F. Maccioni, M. Martinelli, N. Al Ansari, A. Kagarmanova, et al., “Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography: Past, Present and Future: A Review,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 8, 2010, pp. 721-725.

[6]   E. C. Kaltenthaler, S. J. Walters, J. Chilcott, A. Blakeborough, Y. B. Vergel and S. Thomas, “MRCP Compared to Diagnostic ERCP for Diagnosis When Biliary Obstruction Is Suspected: A Systematic Review,” BMC Medical Imaging, Vol. 6, 2006, pp. 9-24. doi:10.1186/1471-2342-6-9

[7]   M. G. Scaffidi, C. Luigiano, P. Consolo, R. Pellicano, G. Giacobbe, M. Gaeta, et al., Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Common Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study,” Minerva Medica, Vol. 100, No. 5, 2009, pp. 341-348.

[8]   E. L. Hanninen, H. Amthauer, N. Hosten, J. Ricke, M. Bohmig, J. Langrehr, et al., “Prospective Evaluation of Pancreatic Tumours: Accuracy of MR Imaging with MR Cholangiopancreatography and MR Angiography,” Radiology, Vol. 224, No. 1, 2002, pp. 34-41. doi:10.1148/radiol.2241010798

[9]   P. Angulo, D. H. Pearce, C. D. Johnson, J. J. Henry, N. F. Larusso, B. T. Petersen, et al., “Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Biliary Disease: Its Role in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis,” Journal of Hepatology, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2000, pp. 520-527. doi:10.1016/S0168-8278(00)80002-1

[10]   G. Galati, A. V. Sterpetti, M. Caputo, M. Adduci, G. Lucandri, S. Brozzetti, et al., “Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography for Intrabiliary Rupture of Hydatic Cyst,” The American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 191, No. 2, 2006, pp. 206-210. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.09.014

[11]   M. M. Calvo, L. Bujanda, A. Calderon, J. L. Cabriada, A. Bernal, V. Orive, et al., “Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Suspected Choledocholithiasis,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 77, No. 5, 2002, pp. 422-428. doi:10.1016/S0025-6196(11)62210-6

[12]   E. Kaltenthaler, Y. B. Vergel, J. Chilcott, S. Thomas, T. Blakeborough, S. J. Waters, et al., “A Systematic Review and Economic Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Compared with Diagnostic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography,” Health Technology Assessment, Vol. 8, No. 10, 2004, pp. 1-89.

[13]   R. Schofl, “Diagnostic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholan- giopancreatography,” Endoscopy, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2001, pp. 147-157. doi:10.1055/s-2001-11667

[14]   M. L. Freeman, D. B. Nelson, S. Sherman, G. B. Haber, M. E. Herman, P. J. Dorsher, et al., “Complications of Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 335, No. 13, 1996, pp. 909-919. doi:10.1056/NEJM199609263351301

[15]   T. Obana, N. Fujita, Y. Noda, G. Kobayashi, K. Ito, J. Horaguchi, et al., “Efficacy and Safety of Therapeutic ERCP for the Elderly with Choledocholithiasis: Comparison with Younger Patients,” Internal Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 18, 2010, pp. 1935-1941. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.49.3660

[16]   K. Hekimoglu, Y. Ustundag, A. Dusak, Z. Erdem, B. Karademir, S. Aydemir, et al., “MRCP vs ERCP in the Evaluation of Biliary Pathologies: Review of Current Literature,” Journal of Digestive Diseases, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2008, pp. 162-169. doi:10.1111/j.1751-2980.2008.00339.x

 
 
Top