Back
 ENG  Vol.4 No.10 , October 2012
An Experimental Study on a Characteristics of Flow around Groyne Area by Install Conditions
Abstract: In designing group groynes, the space of the groynes is an important factor, and the flow between the groyne areas will vary along the space. Since the flow in the groyne field significantly affects the flow change, the bed change, the bank erosion and the condition of the habitat, an assessment of the flow along the space of the groynes will yield important data needed to diversify the object of the groyne installation. To provide basic data for the determination of the proper space of groynes in a groyne group, the flow in the channel and groyne field, which varies with the installation of the groyne, is herein analyzed. The space of the groynes was set from the same length to 12 times the length of the groyne, and the flow range was measured using the LSPIV method and ADV. The influence of the angle of the installation was also analyzed. As a result, through the flow configuration in the groyne field and the flow range at the center of the groyne field against the space of the groyne, the decreasing influence of groyne erosion was suggested by the analysis of the shelter effect of aquatics and the countercurrent in the bank line.
Cite this paper: J. Kang, H. Yeo and C. Kim, "An Experimental Study on a Characteristics of Flow around Groyne Area by Install Conditions," Engineering, Vol. 4 No. 10, 2012, pp. 636-645. doi: 10.4236/eng.2012.410081.
References

[1]   A. R. Acheson, “River Control and Drainge in New Zealand, Ministry of Work,” New Zealand, 1968.

[2]   G. B. Fenwick, “State of Knowledge of Channel Stabilization in Major Alluvial River,” Report No. FHWA/ RD-83/099, US Department of Transportation, Washington DC, 1969.

[3]   E. V. Richardson and D. B. Simons, “Spurs and Guide Banks,” Open File Report, Colorado State University Engineering Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, 1974.

[4]   P. Jansen, L. Van Bendegorn, J. Van den Berg, M. De Vries and A. Zanen, “Principles of River Engineering,” The Non-Tidal Alluvial River, Pitman, London, 1979.

[5]   B. Z. Kinori and J. Mevorach, “Manual of Surface Drainage Engineering,” Volume II, Streamflow Engineer- ing and Flood Protection, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984.

[6]   R. R Copeland, “Bank Protection Techniques Using Spur Dikes,” Miscellaneous paper HL83-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, 1983.

[7]   FHWA, “Design of Spur-Type Streambank Stabilization Structures,” US DOT, FHWA, Rep. No. FHWA/RD 84/101, McLean, 1985.

[8]   R. Ettema and M. Muste, “Scale Effects in Flume Experiments on Flow around a Spur Dike in Flatbed Channel,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 7, 2004, pp. 635-646. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:7(635)

[9]   V. Weitbrecht, G. Kuhn and G. H. Jirka, “Large Scale PIV-Measurements at the Surface of Shallow Water Flows,” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 13, No. 5-6, 2002, pp. 237-245. doi:10.1016/S0955-5986(02)00059-6

[10]   J. G. Kang, H. K. Yeo and S. J. Kim, “An Experimental Study on Tip Velocity and Downstream Recirculation Zone of Single Groyne Conditions,” Journal of Korea Water Resource Association, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2005, pp. 143-153. doi:10.3741/JKWRA.2005.38.2.143

 
 
Top