Abelmann, C., & Elmore, R. (1999). When accountability knocks, will anyone answer? Consortium for Policy Research in Education, ERIC ED 428463.
 Adams, J. E., & Kirst, M. (1999). New demands for educational accountability: Striving for results in an era of excellence. In J. Murphy and K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational administration (pp. 463-489, 2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
 Anderson, G. L. (2009). Advocacy leadership: Toward a post-reform agenda in education. New York: Routledge.
 Berry, B., Fuller, E., Reeves, C., & Laird, E. (2006b). Linking teachers and student data to improve teacher and teaching quality. URL (last checked 18 March 2010). http://www.dataqualitycampaign.com.
 Cindy, H., & Joellen, K. (2007). Ten roles for teacher leaders. Educational Leadership, 65, 74-77.
 Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 375-395. doi:10.3102/01623737025004375
 Darling-Hammond, L. (1989). Accountability for professional practice. Teachers college Record, 91, 59-80.
 Darling-Hammond, L., & Ball, D. L. (1999). What can policy do to support teaching to high standards? CPRE Policy Bulletin. URL (last checked 30 June 2008).
 Data Quality Campaign (2006). Creating a longitudinal data system: Using data to improve student achievement. URL (last checked18 March 2012). http://www.dataqualitycampaign.com
 Data Quality Campaign (2009). The next step: Using longitudinal data systems to improve student success. URL (last checked18 March 2010). http://www.dataqualitycampaign.com
 Day, C. (2002). School reform and transition in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 667- 692. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00065-X
 Eisner, E. W. (2002). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
 Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (2000). Doing educational administration: A theory of administrative practice. New York: Pergamon.
 Firestone, W. A., & Herriott, R. E. (1982). Two images of schools as organizations: An explication and illustrative empirical test. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 18, 39-59.
 Fusarelli, L. D. (2002). Tightly coupled policy in loosely coupled systems: Institutional capacity and organizational change. Journal of Educational Administration, 40, 561-575.
 Gaither, G., Nedwek, B. P., & Neal, J. E. (1995). Measuring up: The promises and pitfalls of performance indicators in higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No 5. ERIC ED 383278.
 Greenfield, T. B. (1986). The decline and fall of science in educational administration. Interchange, 17, 57-80. doi:10.1007/BF01807469
 Greenfield, T. B. (1991). Reforming and revaluing educational administration: Whence and when cometh the phoenix? Educational Management and Administration, 19, 200-217.
 Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. London: Sage Publications.
 Habermas, J. (1996). Three normative models of democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
 Hargreave, A., & Goodson, I. F. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In I. F. Goodson, & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers professional lives (pp. 1-27). London: Farmer Press.
 Harris, A. (2008). Distributed school leadership: Developing tomorrow’s leaders. New York: Routledge.
 Honig, M. J., & Coburn, C. (2008). Evidence-based decision making in school district central offices: Toward a policy and research agenda. Educational Policy, 22, 578-608. doi:10.1177/0895904807307067
 Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2012). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). McGrow-Hill: New York.
 Jones, B. D. (2007). The unintended outcomes of high-stakes testing. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 23, 65-86.
 Knapp, M. S. (2008). How can organizational and sociocultural learning theories shed light on district instructional reform? American Journal of Education, 114, 521-539. doi:10.1086/589313
 Lachat, M. A., & Smith, S. (2005). Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10, 333-349. doi:10.1207/s15327671espr1003_7
 Laird, E. (2006b). Data use drives schools and district improvement. URL (last checked 18 March 2010).
 Lima, J. A. (2007). Teachers’ professional development in departmentalised, loosely coupled organisations: Lessons for school improvement from a case study of two curriculum department. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18, 273-301.
 Linn, R. L. (2001). The design and evaluation of educational assessment and accountability. CSE Technical Reprot 539. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standard, and Student Testing.
 Loeb, H., Knapp, M. S., & Efers, A. (2008). Teachers’ response to standards-based reform: Probing reform assumptions in Washington State. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 16, 1-32.
 Louis, K. S., Kruse, S., & Raywid, M. A. (1996). Putting teachers at the center of reform: Learning schools and professional community. NASSP Bulletin, 80, 9-21. doi:10.1177/019263659608058003
 Mansbridge, J. (1990). The rise and fall of self-interest in the explanation of political life. In Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
 Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education: Evidence from recent RAND research. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. URL (last checked 28 November 2009).
 Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Rigdon, M. (1997). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 41-74.
 Oakes, J. (1989). What educational indicators? The case for assessing the school context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 181-199.
 O’Day, J. A. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school Improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72.
 Ogawa, R. T., & Collom, E. (2000). Using performance indicators to hold schools accountable: Implicit assumptions and inherent tensions. Peobody Journal of Education, 75, 200-215.
 Opper, V. D., Henry, G. T., & Mashburn, A. J. (2008). The district effect: Systemic response to high stakes accountability policies in six southern states. American Journal of Education, 114, 299-332.
 Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2009). Co-constructing distributed leadership: District and school connections in data-driven decision-making. School leadership and Management, 29, 477-494.
 Petty, N. W., & Green, T. (2006). Measuring educational opportunity as perceived by students: A process indicator. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18, 67-91. doi:10.1080/09243450601104750
 Popham, W. J. (2001). The truth about testing: An educator’s call in action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
 Porter, A. C. (1991). Creating a system of school process indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 13-29.
 Ranson, S. (2003). Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal government. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 459-480.
 Reyes, P., Wagstaff, L. H,. & Fusarelli, L. D. (1999). Delta forces: The changing fabric of American society and education. In J. Murphy, & K. S. Louse, (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 183-202, 2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
 Rothstein, R. (2000). Toward a composite index of school performance. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 409-441.
 Sch?n, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
 Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theory of practice. New York: Sage publications.
 Sheldon, K. M., & Biddle, B. J. (1998). Standards, accountability, and school Reform: Perils and pitfalls. Teacher College Record, 100, 164-180.
 Skyes, G. (1999). The new professionalism in education: An appraisal. In J. Murphy, & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational administration (pp. 203-226, 2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
 Spillane, J. P. (2004). State, standard, assessment, and accountability instruments in practice: When the rubber hits the road. URL (last checked 2 May 2009).
 Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 3-34. doi:10.1080/0022027032000106726
 Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
 Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M., Pustejovsky, J., Pareja, A. S., & Lewis, G. (2008). Taking a distributed perspective: Epistemological and methodological tradeoffs in operationalizing the leader-plus aspect. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 189-213.
 Stecher, B. M. (2005). Developing process indicators to improve educational governance: Lessons for education from health care. Testimony presented to the California Little Hoover Commission. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
 Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Evaluation models. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
 Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
 Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 519-558. doi:10.3102/0002831207306859
 Wayman, J. C. & Stringfield, S. (2006). Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education, 112, 549- 571. doi:10.1086/505059
 Wayman, J. C., Cho, V., & Johnston, M. T. (2007). The data-informed district: A district-wide evaluation of data use in the Natrona County School District. Austin, TX: The University of Texas.
 Wayman, J. C., Stringfield, S., & Yakimowski, M. (2004). Software enabling school improvement through analysis of student data. Report No. 67. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University.
 Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
 Woods, P. A., Bennett, N., Harvey, J. A., & Wise, C. (2004). Variabilities and dualities in distributed leadership: Findings from a systematic literature review. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 32, 439-457. doi:10.1177/1741143204046497
 Young, V. M. (2006). Teachers’ use of data: Loose coupling, agenda setting, and team norms. American Journal of Education, 112, 521- 548. doi:10.1086/505058