BLR  Vol.3 No.3 , September 2012
Un/Controlling Desire, Becoming Others Negotiating Justice in the Hong Kong Milieu of Mainland Pregnant Women Influx
Abstract: In the article, I attempt to construct a singular perspective of justice by comparing different paradigms of justice— Rawlsian philosophy, Buddhist ideology and Deleuzean theory in the context of Hong Kong where there has been increasing resistance among local people against the influx of Mainland pregnant women, who are regarded as outsiders depriving the local community the much needed local (medical) resources.
Cite this paper: M. Chiu, "Un/Controlling Desire, Becoming Others Negotiating Justice in the Hong Kong Milieu of Mainland Pregnant Women Influx," Beijing Law Review, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2012, pp. 92-102. doi: 10.4236/blr.2012.33012.

[1]   M. C. Nussbau, “Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership,” The Belknap Press, Cambridge, 2006, p. 24.

[2]   J. Rawls, “Political Liberalism,” Columbia University Press, New York, 2005.

[3]   P. C. Chow, “Politics of Liberal Equality,” Joint Publishing Company, Beijing, 2010, p. 1.

[4]   D. Z. Yao, “John Rawls,” Changchun Publishing House, Changchun, 2011, p. 10.

[5]   H. W. Lin, “Justice and Citizenship,” Jilin Publishing Group Limited, Changchun, 2008, p. 32.

[6]   D. H. Zhao, “Rawls’s Theory of Justice: A Comment,” Joint Publication, Hong Kong, 1988, p. 151.

[7]   J. Rawls, “A Theory of Justice,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1971, pp. 225-241.

[8]   B. Barry, “Why Social Justice Matters,” Polity, Cambridge, 2005, p. 16.

[9]   P. Feng, “Wooden-Legged Justice,” Peking University Press, Beijing, 2007, p. 40.

[10]   A. Sen, “The Idea of Justice,” The Belknap Press, Cambridge, 2009, p. xi.

[11]   C. Douzinas and R. Warrington, “The Face of Justice: A Jurisprudence of Alterity,” Social Legal Studies, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1994, p. 405-425. doi:10.1177/096466399400300306

[12]   J. Derrida, “Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority’,” Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 919, 1990, p. 921-1045.

[13]   G. Ma, “CJ’s speech at Ceremonial Opening of the Legal Year 2011,” 2011.

[14]   D. M. Engel and J. S. Engel, “Tort, Custom, and Karma: Globalization and Legal Consciousness in Thailand,” Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2010, p. 128.

[15]   M.-C. Chiu, “Going Beyond Globalization and Localization: Articulating a Theory of Justice in Han-Chinese Culture,” Law and Critique, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2010, pp. 93110. doi:10.1007/s10978-009-9061-2

[16]   M.-C. Chiu, “Beyond Colonialism: Osmotic Reconstruction of Gender/Sexual Justice,” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2009, pp. 399-421. doi:10.1080/14649370902949390

[17]   M.-C. Chiu, “A Hybrid of Harmony and Resistance at the Margin: Legal Discourse of Gender/Sexual Justice in Hong Kong, P. R. China,” Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 35, 2008, pp. 179-201.

[18]   M.-C. Chiu, “De/Sexing Law/Fa: Development of an Indigenous Theory of Sexuality Justice in Hong Kong,” Hong Kong Law Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2007, pp. 775803.

[19]   S. J. Hu, “Political Analysis of Law,” Peking University Press, Beijing, 2005, p. 9.

[20]   Z. J. Li, “Political Philosophy of Well Ordered Society,” People’s Publishing House, Beijing, 2009, p. 210.

[21]   Y. Ni, “The Concept of Justice in Societal Change,” Shandong University Press, Jinan, 2006, p. 3.

[22]   G. J. Wan, “Study on Mengzi’s Theory of Ren and Yi,” Shandong University Press, Jinan, 2009, p. 157.

[23]   C. H. Shih, “Emotional Connection and Desire: A Buddhist Perspective,” In: M.-C. Chiu, Ed., Chinese Sex (uality)/Gender-Age Machine, Red Publication, Hong Kong, 2011, p. 71.

[24]   B. Mukhi, “The Circle of Life Revolved around Avidya, Desire & Karma,” 2011.

[25]   S.-J. Zhōu, “Studies of Vijnanamatra,” Heavenly Lotus, Taipei, 1998, p. 5.

[26]   J. Powers, “Wisdoms of Buddha: The Samdhinirmocana Sutra,” Dharma Publishing, Berkeley, 1995.

[27]   H. X. Shih, “Vijnanamatra,” BaShuShuShe, Chengdu, 2009, p. 75.

[28]   J. Koller, “Asian Philosophies,” 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2002, p. 222.

[29]   J. T. Sun, “Psychology in Primitive Buddhism,” In: A. Molino, Ed., The Couch and the Tree: Dialogues in Psychoanalysis and Buddhism, North Point Press, New York, 1988, p. 3.

[30]   B. Chen, “Buddhist Psychology,” Buddha’s Light, Taipei, 2007, pp. 795-848.

[31]   S. Chan, “Buddhism and Human Rights,” In: R. Smith and C. Van Den Anker, Eds, Human Rights, Hodder Arnold, Spain, 2005, p. 25.

[32]   L. T. Fang, “Chinese Buddhist Culture,” Joint Publication, Hong Kong, 2008, p. 138.

[33]   G. H. Zhou, “Vijnanamatra Thoughts: An Introduction to Yogacara Buddhism Volume 1,” China Social Sciences Press, Beijing, 2009, p. 13.

[34]   R. Epstein, “The Transformation of Consciousness into Wisdom in the Chinese Consciousness-Only School According to the Cheng Wei-Shi Lun,” 1985.

[35]   J. Safran, “Psychoanalysis and Buddhism as Cultural Institutions,” In: J. Safran, Ed., Psychoanalysis and Buddhism: An Unfolding Dialogue, Wisdom Publication, Boston, 2003, p. 23.

[36]   W. Z. Yang, “A Research of the Nature of Mind of Chinese Buddhism,” Religious Culture, Beijing, 2007, pp. 298-299.

[37]   C.-H. Shih, “Differences in the Principles of Monastic Precepts and Law,” Studies in Oriental Religions, Vol. 4, No. 6, 1994, pp. 103-115.

[38]   L. De Bolle, “Deleuze and Psychoanalysis,” Leuven University Press, Leuven, 2010.

[39]   D. Goodley, “Becoming Rhizomatic Parents: Deleuze, Guattari and Disabled Babies,” Disability and Society, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2007, pp. 145-160. doi:10.1080/09687590601141576

[40]   C. Colebrook, “Understanding Deleuze,” Allen and Unwin, Crows Nest, 2003, p. 56.

[41]   N. Jun, “Deleuze and Normativity,” Philosophy Today, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2009, pp. 347-358.

[42]   G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, “Anti-Oedipus,” Continuum, London, 1984.

[43]   B. Ian “Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus,” Continuum, London, 2008.

[44]   N. Rose, “Government and Control,” British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2000, pp. 321-339. doi:10.1093/bjc/40.2.321

[45]   J. Winslade, “Tracing Lines of Flight: Implications of the Work of Gilles Deleuze for Narrative Practice,” Family Process, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2009, pp. 332-346. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01286.x

[46]   S. Linstead and A. Pullen, “Gender as Multiplicity: Desire, Displacement, Difference and Dispersion,” Human Relations, Vol. 59, No. 9, 2006, pp. 1287-1310. doi:10.1177/0018726706069772

[47]   D. Sutton and D. Martin-Jones, “Deleuze Reframed,” I. B. Tauris, London, 2008, p. 6.

[48]   L. R. Bryant, “Difference and Givenness: Deleuze’s Transcendental Empiricism and the Ontology of Immanence,” Northwestern University Press, Evanston, 2008, p. 58.

[49]   G. Deleuze, “Negotiations,” Columbia University Press, New York, 1995.

[50]   L. Capeheart and D. Milovanovic, “Social Justice: Theories, Issues and Movements,” Rutgers University Press, Piscataway, 2007, p. 125.

[51]   J. Weinstein, “Introduction Part II,” In: C. Colebrook and J Weinstein, Eds., Deleuze and Gender, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2008, p. 23.

[52]   J. Rajchman, “The Deleuze Connections,” MIT Press, London, 2000, p. 153.