IB  Vol.4 No.3 , September 2012
Identification and Evaluation of the Effective Criteria on Customer Satisfaction with Kitchen Worktops Product
ABSTRACT
In cycle of attraction and keeping the customers, fulfilling the customer satisfaction via identifying of their needs is very important. So, identifying the amount of customer satisfaction and informed of the field of strength and weakness in this regard, helps manager programming in line with customers better maintenance. The objective of this study is determination and priority of effecting criteria on customer satisfaction of worktops product. For this purpose, after preliminary investigation and interviews with experts and worktops customers, the effective criteria were identified. Then the priority rates (weighting value) of obtained criteria and sub-criteria were determined by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). On the base of obtained results the criteria of selling and price condition, delivery condition, payment condition, the quality of CPL veneer, the quality of used MDF and lead time of product have the highest priorities, respectively.

Cite this paper
V. Nabavi, M. Azizi and N. Mohebbi, "Identification and Evaluation of the Effective Criteria on Customer Satisfaction with Kitchen Worktops Product," iBusiness, Vol. 4 No. 3, 2012, pp. 235-245. doi: 10.4236/ib.2012.43030.
References
[1]   G. Varva, “Improving Your Measurement of Customer Satisfaction: A Guide to Creating, Conducting, Analyzing, and Reporting Customer Satisfaction Measurement Programs,” ASQ Quality press, Milwaukee, 1997.

[2]   Z. Mehdi, R. Barab and Farrokh, “Designing a Model to Measure Customer Satisfaction and Its Implementation in the Rubber Industry,” Journal of Management, Vol. 5, No. 12, 2008, pp. 47-62.

[3]   S. Sohail and M. Saeed, “Measurement of Satisfaction Level of End Users of Rafsanjan Pistachio Company through AHP,” Journal of Industrial Management, Faculty of Humanities, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 37-48, 2007.

[4]   F. Mahmoud, M. Moqadaseh and G. Hadi, “Weighting and Ranking the Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction in the Automotive Industry Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” Culture Management, Vol. 4, No. 13, 2006, pp. 37-64.

[5]   Y. J. Jeong and Y. S. Lee, “A Study on the Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty of Furniture Purchaser in On-Line Shop,” Asian Journal on Quality, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2010, pp. 146-156

[6]   S. Ahmad and E. Amir, “Designing a Model to Measure Customer Satisfaction in the Developmental Banking Industry and Accordingly to Measure Customer Satisfaction of Bank of Industry and Mine,” Knowledge Management, Vol. 21, No. 21, 2008, pp. 57-74.

[7]   C. K. Kwong and H. Bai, “Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 35, No. 7, 2003, pp. 367-377.

[8]   L. V. Vanegas and A. W. Labib, “A Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment (FQFD) Model for Driving Optimum Targets,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2001, pp. 99-120. doi:10.1080/00207540010005079

[9]   G. Pour and S. Hassan, “Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” Amirkabir University Publication Center, Tehran, 2000.

[10]   A. M. Javad, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making,” Tehran University Press, Tehran, 1998.

[11]   T. L. Saaty, “Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory,” 2nd Edition, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 2000.

[12]   E. Anderson, “Customer Satisfaction and? Price Tolerance,” Marketing Letters, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1996, pp. 265-274. doi:10.1007/BF00435742

[13]   F. Mahmoud, M. Moqadaseh and G. Hadi, “Weighting and Ranking the Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction in the Automotive Industry Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” Culture Management, Vol. 4, No. 13, 2006, pp. 37-64.

[14]   M. Kobra and R. Ali, “Determination and Evaluation of the Factors Affecting the Use of MDF Wood Products,” Wood and Paper Industry, Vol. 8, No. 45, 2009, pp. 34-37.

 
 
Top