Addressing Misconceptions about the Particulate Nature of Matter among Secondary-School and High-School Students in the Republic of Macedonia
Affiliation(s)
Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ss Cyril & Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ss Cyril & Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
ABSTRACT
A study was conducted to identify concepts about the particulate nature of matter among secondary- and high-school students (N = 187) and to address some misconceptions regarding this topic, especially the misunderstandings related to the vague ideas of the relationship between the macro and micro world. Data were collected using both quantitative (six-item multiple-choice instrument in a pre-test-post-test design) and qualitative (semi-structured focus group interviews) methods. Paired-samples t-test analysis showed that students experienced significantly higher results in the post-test when compared to the pre-test, thus confirming the efficiency of the intervention program in facilitating the understanding of some basic elements of the theory and practice concerning the particulate nature of matter (widely known as particle theory concepts, a term which will be used in this paper as well) among students of different levels of study. The findings revealed seven misconceptions prevalent by more than 20% of students and some additional ones emerged from the in-depth focus group discussions. The analysis of the content of textbooks indicated that some erroneous chemical concepts might have been formed as a result of the teaching of chemistry and that of physics, as well. The use of animations and molecular models had a positive effect on students and pointed to the need of introducing, in the chemistry teaching, the new material more visually.
A study was conducted to identify concepts about the particulate nature of matter among secondary- and high-school students (N = 187) and to address some misconceptions regarding this topic, especially the misunderstandings related to the vague ideas of the relationship between the macro and micro world. Data were collected using both quantitative (six-item multiple-choice instrument in a pre-test-post-test design) and qualitative (semi-structured focus group interviews) methods. Paired-samples t-test analysis showed that students experienced significantly higher results in the post-test when compared to the pre-test, thus confirming the efficiency of the intervention program in facilitating the understanding of some basic elements of the theory and practice concerning the particulate nature of matter (widely known as particle theory concepts, a term which will be used in this paper as well) among students of different levels of study. The findings revealed seven misconceptions prevalent by more than 20% of students and some additional ones emerged from the in-depth focus group discussions. The analysis of the content of textbooks indicated that some erroneous chemical concepts might have been formed as a result of the teaching of chemistry and that of physics, as well. The use of animations and molecular models had a positive effect on students and pointed to the need of introducing, in the chemistry teaching, the new material more visually.
Cite this paper
Stojanovska, M. , Soptrajanov, B. & Petrusevski, V. (2012). Addressing Misconceptions about the Particulate Nature of Matter among Secondary-School and High-School Students in the Republic of Macedonia. Creative Education, 3, 619-631. doi: 10.4236/ce.2012.35091.
Stojanovska, M. , Soptrajanov, B. & Petrusevski, V. (2012). Addressing Misconceptions about the Particulate Nature of Matter among Secondary-School and High-School Students in the Republic of Macedonia. Creative Education, 3, 619-631. doi: 10.4236/ce.2012.35091.
References
[1] Aleksovska, S., & Antonovska, L. (2010). Chemistry for the 7th grade of eighth-year secondary education. Skopje: Ministry of Education and Science of Republic of Macedonia (in Macedonian). [2] Aleksovska, S., & Stojanovski, K. (2003). Chemistry for the 3rd year of reformed gymnasium education. Skopje: Prosvetno Delo (in Macedonian). [3] Aleksovska, S., & Stojanovski, K. (2005). Chemistry for the 4th year of reformed gymnasium education. Skopje: Prosvetno Delo (in Macedonian). [4] Aleksovska, S. (2011). Personal communication. [5] Anonimous (2003). Common misconceptions about matter. URL (last checked 2 July 2012). http://www.arps.org/users/ms/pricen/one%20pagers/common_misconceptions%20chemistry.pdf [6] Badrian, A., Abdinejad, T., & Naseriazar, A. (2011). A cross-age study of Iranian students’ various conceptions about the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8, 49-63. [7] Banda, A., Mumba, F., Chabalengula, V. M., & Mbewe, S. (2011). Teachers’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter: The case of Zambian pre-service science teachers. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12, Article ID: 4. [8] Barke, H. D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. (2009). Chapter 2: Students’ misconceptions and how to overcome them. In: Misconceptions in chemistry addressing perceptions in chemical education (pp. 21-36). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. [9] BBC (2012). KS3 Bitesize: Science—Behaviour of matter. URL (last checked 2 July 2012). http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/ks3bitesize/science/chemical_material_behaviour/behaviour_of_matter/activity.shtml [10] Ben-Zvi, N., & Gai, R. (1994). Macro- and micro-chemical comprehension of real-world phenomena. Journal of Chemical Education, 71, 730-732. doi:10.1021/ed071p730 [11] Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silberstein, J. (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable? Journal of Chemical Education, 63, 64-66. doi:10.1021/ed063p64 [12] Bindernagel, J. A., & Eilks, I. (2009). Evaluating roadmaps to portray and develop chemistry teachers’ PCK about curricular structures concerning sub-microscopic models. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10, 77-85. doi:10.1039/b908245j [13] Bridle, C. A., & Yezierski, E. J. (2011). Evidence for the effectiveness of inquiry-based, particulate-level instruction on conceptions of the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 192- 198. doi:10.1021/ed100735u [14] Bucat, B. (2004). Pedagogical content knowledge as a way forward: Applied research in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5, 215-228. doi:10.1039/b4rp90025a [15] ?alyk, M., Ayas, A., & Ebenezer, J. V. (2005). A review of solution chemistry studies: Insights into students’ conceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 29-50. [16] Canpolat, N. (2006). Turkish undergraduates’ misconceptions of eva [17] poration, evaporation rate, and vapour pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1757-1770. doi:10.1080/09500690600779957 [18] Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 293-307. doi:10.1039/b7rp90006f [19] Chiu, M.-H. (2005). A national survey of students’ conceptions in chemistry in Taiwan. Chemical Education International, 6, 8 p. [20] Cliff, W. H. (2009). Chemistry misconceptions associated with understanding calcium and phosphate homeostasis. Advances in Physiology Education, 33, 323-328. doi:10.1152/advan.00073.2009 [21] Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners’ mental models of ionic bonding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 464-486. doi:10.1002/tea.10085 [22] Cvetkovi?, S. (2002a). Chemistry for the 7th grade. Skopje: Prosvetno Delo (in Macedonian). [23] Cvetkovi?, S. (2002b). Chemistry for the 1st year of reformed gymnasium education. Skopje: Prosvetno Delo (in Macedonian). [24] De Vos, W., & Verdonk, A. H. (1996). The particulate nature of matter in science education and in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 657-664. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199608)33:6<657::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N [25] Demircio?lu, G. (2009). Comparison of the effect of conceptual change texts implemented after and before instruction on secondary school students’ understanding of acid-base concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10, Article ID: 5. [26] Demircio?lu, G., Ayas, A., & Demircio?lu, H. (2005). Conceptual change achieved through a new teaching program on acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6, 36-51. doi:10.1039/b4rp90003k [27] Dhindsa, H. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Conceptual understanding of Bruneian tertiary students: Chemical bonding and structure. Brunei International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 1, 33-51. [28] Eilks, I., Witteck, T., & Pietzner, V. (2012). The role and potential dangers of visualisation when learning about sub-microscopic explanations in chemistry education. Centre for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 2, 125-145. [29] Eybe, H., & Schmidt, H. (2004). Group discussions as a tool for investigating students’ concepts, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5, 265-280. doi:10.1039/b4rp90028f [30] Gabel, D. L., & Samuel, K. V. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 695-697. doi:10.1021/ed064p695 [31] Ge?oski, S., & Nonkulovski, F. (2009). Physics for the 7th grade of eighth-year-secondary education. Skopje: Ministry of Education and Science of Republic of Macedonia (in Macedonian). [32] Gregorius, R. M. (n.d.). An eBook in flash to support inductive learning. URL (last checked 2 July 2012). http://www3.canisius.edu/~gregorir/ic2home/eBookPaper.pdf [33] Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, A. K. (1992). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 611-628. doi:10.1002/tea.3660290609 [34] Herrmann Abell, C. F., & DeBoer, G. E. (2011). Using distractor-given standard-based multiple-choice assessment and Rasch modelling to investigate hierarchies of chemistry misconceptions and detect structural problems with individual items. Chemistry Education Research and Practise, 12, 184-192. doi:10.1039/c1rp90023d [35] Hoque, K. E., Alam, G. M., Ariff, M. R. B. M., Mishra, P. K., & Rabby, T. G. (2011). Site-based management: Impact of leader’s roles on institutional improvement. African Journal of Business Management, 5, 3623-3629. [36] Horton, C. (with other members of the Modeling Instruction in High School Chemistry Action Research Teams at Arizona State University) (2007). Student Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry. URL (last checked 2 July 2012). http://www.scribd.com/doc/52664732/student-alternative-conceptions-in-chemistry [37] Hussein, A. (2009). The use of triangulation in social sciences research: Can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined? Journal of Comparative Social Work, 1, 1-12. [38] Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quaterly, 24, 602-611. doi:10.2307/2392366 [39] Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry—Logical or psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 1, 9-15. doi:10.1039/a9rp90001b [40] José, T. J., & Williamson, V. M. (2005). Molecular visualization in science education: An evaluation of an NSF-sponsored workshop. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 937-943. doi:10.1021/ed082p937 [41] Kabap?nar, F. M. (2009). Multi-frame illustrations: A molecular visual strategy in learning and teaching chemistry concepts. Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 69, 11-16. [42] Kariper, ?. A. (2011). An investigation into the misconceptions, erroneous ideas and limited conception of the pH concept in pre-service science teacher education. The Chemical Education Journal, 14. [43] Kind, V. (2004). Beyond appearances: Students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas (2nd ed.). Durham: Durham University. URL (last checked 2 July 2012). http://www.rsc.org/images/Misconceptions_update_tcm18-188603.pdf [44] Kvale, S. (1996). Chapter 7: The interview situation. In Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing (pp. 124-135). London: Sage. [45] Levy Nahum, T., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Bar-Dov, Z. (2004). Can final examinations amplify students’ misconceptions in chemistry? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5, 301-325. [46] Margel, H., Eylon, B.-S., & Scherz, Z. (2004). “We actually saw atoms with our own eyes” conceptions and convictions in using the scanning tunneling microscope in junior high school. Journal of Chemical Education, 81, 558-566. doi:10.1021/ed081p558 [47] Mayer, K. (2011). Addressing students’ misconceptions about gases, mass, and composition. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 111-115. doi:10.1021/ed1005085 [48] Meijer, M. R. (2011). Macro-meso-micro thinking with structure- property relations for chemistry education. An explorative design- based study. Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht: Utrecht University. [49] Milne, R. W. (1999). Animating reactions. A low-cost activity for particle conceptualization at the secondary level. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 50-51. doi:10.1021/ed076p50 [50] Monkovi?, M., Ivanovski, V., & Petru?evski V. M. (2007). Demonstrations as a tool for ironing-out misconceptions: 3. A note on the reaction Pb2+(aq) + 2I?(aq) = PbI2(s): Exceptions from a priori expectations. The Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 68, 17-19. [51] Morg?l, ?., & Y?rük, N. (2006). Cross-age study of understanding of some concepts in chemistry subjects in science curriculum. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 3, 15-27. [52] Mulford, D. R., & Robinson, W. R. (2002). An inventory for alternate conceptions among first-semester general chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 739-744. doi:10.1021/ed079p739 [53] Muzaffar, H., Castelli, D. M., Goss, D., Scherer, J. A., & Chapman- Novakofski, K. (2011). Middle school students want more than games for health education on the internet. Creative Education, 2, 393-397. doi:10.4236/ce.2011.24056 [54] Nair, S., & Ngang, T. K. (2012). Exploring parent’s and teacher’s views of primary pupils’ thinking skills and problem solving skills. Creative Education, 3, 30-36. doi:10.4236/ce.2012.31005 [55] Nelson, P. G. (2003). Basic chemical concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 4, 19-24. doi:10.1039/b2rp90033e [56] Nyachwaya, J. M., Mohamed, A., Roehrig, G. H., Wood, N. B., Kern, A. L., & Schneider, J. L. (2011). The development of an open-ended drawing tool: An alternative diagnostic tool for assessing students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 121-132. doi:10.1039/c1rp90017j [57] Oloruntegbe, K. O., Ikpe, A., & Kukuru, J. D. (2010). Factors in students’ ability to connect school science with community and real- world life. Educational Research and Reviews, 5, 372-379. [58] Onwu, G. O. M., & Randal, E. (2006). Some aspects of students’ understanding of representational model of the particulate nature of matter in chemistry in three different countries. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7, 226-239. doi:10.1039/b6rp90012g [59] Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 441-467. doi:10.1080/09500690010006518 [60] ?zmen, H., & Kenan, O. (2007). Determination of the Turkish primary students’ views about the particulate nature of matter. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8, Article ID: 1. [61] ?zmen, H. (2011). Turkish primary school students’ conceptions about the particulate nature of matter. Internationa Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 6, 99-121. [62] Pabu?cu, A., & Geban, ?. (2006). Remediating misconceptions concerning chemical bonding through conceptual change text. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30, 184-192. [63] Papageorgiou, G., & Sakka, D. (2000). Primary school teschers’ views of fundamental chemical concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1, 237-247. doi:10.1039/a9rp90025j [64] Petru?evski, V. M., Monkovi?, M., & ?optrajanov, B. (2007). Demonstrations as a tool for ironing-out preconceptions: 1. On the reactions of alkali metal sulfates with concentrated sulfuric acid. The Chemical Educator, 12, 1-4. [65] Petru?evski, V. M., Taseska, M., & Monkovi?, M. (2006). Demonstrations as a tool for ironing-out misconceptions: 2. Can a strong acid be displaced by a weak one? The Chemical Education Journal, 9. [66] Regan, A., Childs, P., & Hayes, S. (2011). The use of an intervention programme to improve undergraduate students’ chemical knowledge and address their misconceptions, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 219-227. doi:10.1039/c1rp90027g [67] Roschelle, J. (1995). Learning in interactive environments: Prior knowl [68] edge and new experience. In: J. H. Falk, & L. D. Dierking (Eds.), Public institutions for personal learning: Establishing a research agenda (pp. 37-51). Washington DC: American Association of Museums. [69] Salame, I. I., Sarowar, S., Begum, S., & Krauss, D. (2011). Students’ alternative conceptions about atomic properties and the periodic table. The Chemical Educator, 16, 190-194. [70] Schmidt, H., Baumg?rtner, T., & Eybe, H. (2003). Changing ideas about the periodic table of elements and students’ alternative conceptions of isotopes and allotropes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 257-277. doi:10.1002/tea.10076 [71] Silberberg, M. S. (2006). Chemistry. The molecular nature of matter and change (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. [72] Singh, P. (2008). The unexpected reward of qualitative research in assessment: A case example. The Qualitative Report, 13, 278-300. [73] Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4, 2-20. [74] Skamp, K. (2009). Atoms and molecules in primary science: What are teachers to do? Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 69, 5- 10. [75] ?optrajanov, B. (2002a). Chemistry for the 1st year of reformed gymnasium education. Skopje: Prosvetno Delo (in Macedonian). [76] ?optrajanov, B. (2002b). Chemistry for the 2nd year of reformed gymnasium education. Skopje: Prosvetno Delo (in Macedonian). [77] S?zbilir, M., P?narba??, T., & Canpolat, N. (2010). Prospective chemistry teachers’ conceptions of chemical thermodynamics and kinetics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6, 111-121. [78] Stojanovska, M. I., Petru?evski, V. M., & ?optrajanov, B. T. (2012a). On the existence of hydrogen salts of monoprotic acids. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 1168-1170. doi:10.1021/ed2005483 [79] Stojanovska, M., Petru?evski, V. M., & ?optrajanov, B. (2012b). The concept of sublimation—Iodine as an example. Educatión Quimica, 23, 171. [80] Taber, K. (2001). Building the structural concepts of chemistry: Some considerations from educational research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 2, 123-158. doi:10.1039/b1rp90014e [81] Taber, K. S. (2011). Models, molecules and misconceptions: A commentary on “Secondary school students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding”. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8, 3-18. [82] Tasker, R. (1998). The VisChem project: Molecular level animations in chemistry—Potential and caution. UniServe Science News, 9, 12-16. [83] Tatar, E. (2011). Prospective primary school teachers’ misconceptions about states of matter. Educational Research and Reviews, 6, 197- 200. [84] The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (1998). URL (last checked 2 July 2012). http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1998/ [85] Treagust, D. F., Chandrasesaran, A. L., Zain, A. N. M., Ong, E. T., Karpudewan, M., & Halim, L. (2011). Evaluation of an intervention instructional program to facilitate understanding of basic particle concepts among students enrolled in several levels of study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 251-261. doi:10.1039/c1rp90030g [86] Wenning, C. J. (2008). Dealing more effectively with alternative conceptions in science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 5, 11-19. [87] Yezierski, E. J., & Birk, J. P. (2006). Misconceptions about the particulate nature of matter. Using animations to close the gender gap. Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 954-960. doi:10.1021/ed083p954
[1] Aleksovska, S., & Antonovska, L. (2010). Chemistry for the 7th grade of eighth-year secondary education. Skopje: Ministry of Education and Science of Republic of Macedonia (in Macedonian). [2] Aleksovska, S., & Stojanovski, K. (2003). Chemistry for the 3rd year of reformed gymnasium education. Skopje: Prosvetno Delo (in Macedonian). [3] Aleksovska, S., & Stojanovski, K. (2005). Chemistry for the 4th year of reformed gymnasium education. Skopje: Prosvetno Delo (in Macedonian). [4] Aleksovska, S. (2011). Personal communication. [5] Anonimous (2003). Common misconceptions about matter. URL (last checked 2 July 2012). http://www.arps.org/users/ms/pricen/one%20pagers/common_misconceptions%20chemistry.pdf [6] Badrian, A., Abdinejad, T., & Naseriazar, A. (2011). A cross-age study of Iranian students’ various conceptions about the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8, 49-63. [7] Banda, A., Mumba, F., Chabalengula, V. M., & Mbewe, S. (2011). Teachers’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter: The case of Zambian pre-service science teachers. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12, Article ID: 4. [8] Barke, H. D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. (2009). Chapter 2: Students’ misconceptions and how to overcome them. In: Misconceptions in chemistry addressing perceptions in chemical education (pp. 21-36). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. [9] BBC (2012). KS3 Bitesize: Science—Behaviour of matter. URL (last checked 2 July 2012). http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/ks3bitesize/science/chemical_material_behaviour/behaviour_of_matter/activity.shtml [10] Ben-Zvi, N., & Gai, R. (1994). Macro- and micro-chemical comprehension of real-world phenomena. Journal of Chemical Education, 71, 730-732. doi:10.1021/ed071p730 [11] Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silberstein, J. (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable? Journal of Chemical Education, 63, 64-66. doi:10.1021/ed063p64 [12] Bindernagel, J. A., & Eilks, I. (2009). Evaluating roadmaps to portray and develop chemistry teachers’ PCK about curricular structures concerning sub-microscopic models. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10, 77-85. doi:10.1039/b908245j [13] Bridle, C. A., & Yezierski, E. J. (2011). Evidence for the effectiveness of inquiry-based, particulate-level instruction on conceptions of the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 192- 198. doi:10.1021/ed100735u [14] Bucat, B. (2004). Pedagogical content knowledge as a way forward: Applied research in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5, 215-228. doi:10.1039/b4rp90025a [15] ?alyk, M., Ayas, A., & Ebenezer, J. V. (2005). A review of solution chemistry studies: Insights into students’ conceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 29-50. [16] Canpolat, N. (2006). Turkish undergraduates’ misconceptions of eva [17] poration, evaporation rate, and vapour pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1757-1770. doi:10.1080/09500690600779957 [18] Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 293-307. doi:10.1039/b7rp90006f [19] Chiu, M.-H. (2005). A national survey of students’ conceptions in chemistry in Taiwan. Chemical Education International, 6, 8 p. [20] Cliff, W. H. (2009). Chemistry misconceptions associated with understanding calcium and phosphate homeostasis. Advances in Physiology Education, 33, 323-328. doi:10.1152/advan.00073.2009 [21] Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners’ mental models of ionic bonding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 464-486. doi:10.1002/tea.10085 [22] Cvetkovi?, S. (2002a). Chemistry for the 7th grade. Skopje: Prosvetno Delo (in Macedonian). [23] Cvetkovi?, S. (2002b). Chemistry for the 1st year of reformed gymnasium education. Skopje: Prosvetno Delo (in Macedonian). [24] De Vos, W., & Verdonk, A. H. (1996). The particulate nature of matter in science education and in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 657-664. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199608)33:6<657::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N [25] Demircio?lu, G. (2009). Comparison of the effect of conceptual change texts implemented after and before instruction on secondary school students’ understanding of acid-base concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10, Article ID: 5. [26] Demircio?lu, G., Ayas, A., & Demircio?lu, H. (2005). Conceptual change achieved through a new teaching program on acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6, 36-51. doi:10.1039/b4rp90003k [27] Dhindsa, H. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Conceptual understanding of Bruneian tertiary students: Chemical bonding and structure. Brunei International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 1, 33-51. [28] Eilks, I., Witteck, T., & Pietzner, V. (2012). The role and potential dangers of visualisation when learning about sub-microscopic explanations in chemistry education. Centre for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 2, 125-145. [29] Eybe, H., & Schmidt, H. (2004). Group discussions as a tool for investigating students’ concepts, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5, 265-280. doi:10.1039/b4rp90028f [30] Gabel, D. L., & Samuel, K. V. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 695-697. doi:10.1021/ed064p695 [31] Ge?oski, S., & Nonkulovski, F. (2009). Physics for the 7th grade of eighth-year-secondary education. Skopje: Ministry of Education and Science of Republic of Macedonia (in Macedonian). [32] Gregorius, R. M. (n.d.). An eBook in flash to support inductive learning. URL (last checked 2 July 2012). http://www3.canisius.edu/~gregorir/ic2home/eBookPaper.pdf [33] Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, A. K. (1992). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 611-628. doi:10.1002/tea.3660290609 [34] Herrmann Abell, C. F., & DeBoer, G. E. (2011). Using distractor-given standard-based multiple-choice assessment and Rasch modelling to investigate hierarchies of chemistry misconceptions and detect structural problems with individual items. Chemistry Education Research and Practise, 12, 184-192. doi:10.1039/c1rp90023d [35] Hoque, K. E., Alam, G. M., Ariff, M. R. B. M., Mishra, P. K., & Rabby, T. G. (2011). Site-based management: Impact of leader’s roles on institutional improvement. African Journal of Business Management, 5, 3623-3629. [36] Horton, C. (with other members of the Modeling Instruction in High School Chemistry Action Research Teams at Arizona State University) (2007). Student Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry. URL (last checked 2 July 2012). http://www.scribd.com/doc/52664732/student-alternative-conceptions-in-chemistry [37] Hussein, A. (2009). The use of triangulation in social sciences research: Can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined? Journal of Comparative Social Work, 1, 1-12. [38] Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quaterly, 24, 602-611. doi:10.2307/2392366 [39] Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry—Logical or psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 1, 9-15. doi:10.1039/a9rp90001b [40] José, T. J., & Williamson, V. M. (2005). Molecular visualization in science education: An evaluation of an NSF-sponsored workshop. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 937-943. doi:10.1021/ed082p937 [41] Kabap?nar, F. M. (2009). Multi-frame illustrations: A molecular visual strategy in learning and teaching chemistry concepts. Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 69, 11-16. [42] Kariper, ?. A. (2011). An investigation into the misconceptions, erroneous ideas and limited conception of the pH concept in pre-service science teacher education. The Chemical Education Journal, 14. [43] Kind, V. (2004). Beyond appearances: Students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas (2nd ed.). Durham: Durham University. URL (last checked 2 July 2012). http://www.rsc.org/images/Misconceptions_update_tcm18-188603.pdf [44] Kvale, S. (1996). Chapter 7: The interview situation. In Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing (pp. 124-135). London: Sage. [45] Levy Nahum, T., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Bar-Dov, Z. (2004). Can final examinations amplify students’ misconceptions in chemistry? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5, 301-325. [46] Margel, H., Eylon, B.-S., & Scherz, Z. (2004). “We actually saw atoms with our own eyes” conceptions and convictions in using the scanning tunneling microscope in junior high school. Journal of Chemical Education, 81, 558-566. doi:10.1021/ed081p558 [47] Mayer, K. (2011). Addressing students’ misconceptions about gases, mass, and composition. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 111-115. doi:10.1021/ed1005085 [48] Meijer, M. R. (2011). Macro-meso-micro thinking with structure- property relations for chemistry education. An explorative design- based study. Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht: Utrecht University. [49] Milne, R. W. (1999). Animating reactions. A low-cost activity for particle conceptualization at the secondary level. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 50-51. doi:10.1021/ed076p50 [50] Monkovi?, M., Ivanovski, V., & Petru?evski V. M. (2007). Demonstrations as a tool for ironing-out misconceptions: 3. A note on the reaction Pb2+(aq) + 2I?(aq) = PbI2(s): Exceptions from a priori expectations. The Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 68, 17-19. [51] Morg?l, ?., & Y?rük, N. (2006). Cross-age study of understanding of some concepts in chemistry subjects in science curriculum. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 3, 15-27. [52] Mulford, D. R., & Robinson, W. R. (2002). An inventory for alternate conceptions among first-semester general chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 739-744. doi:10.1021/ed079p739 [53] Muzaffar, H., Castelli, D. M., Goss, D., Scherer, J. A., & Chapman- Novakofski, K. (2011). Middle school students want more than games for health education on the internet. Creative Education, 2, 393-397. doi:10.4236/ce.2011.24056 [54] Nair, S., & Ngang, T. K. (2012). Exploring parent’s and teacher’s views of primary pupils’ thinking skills and problem solving skills. Creative Education, 3, 30-36. doi:10.4236/ce.2012.31005 [55] Nelson, P. G. (2003). Basic chemical concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 4, 19-24. doi:10.1039/b2rp90033e [56] Nyachwaya, J. M., Mohamed, A., Roehrig, G. H., Wood, N. B., Kern, A. L., & Schneider, J. L. (2011). The development of an open-ended drawing tool: An alternative diagnostic tool for assessing students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 121-132. doi:10.1039/c1rp90017j [57] Oloruntegbe, K. O., Ikpe, A., & Kukuru, J. D. (2010). Factors in students’ ability to connect school science with community and real- world life. Educational Research and Reviews, 5, 372-379. [58] Onwu, G. O. M., & Randal, E. (2006). Some aspects of students’ understanding of representational model of the particulate nature of matter in chemistry in three different countries. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7, 226-239. doi:10.1039/b6rp90012g [59] Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 441-467. doi:10.1080/09500690010006518 [60] ?zmen, H., & Kenan, O. (2007). Determination of the Turkish primary students’ views about the particulate nature of matter. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8, Article ID: 1. [61] ?zmen, H. (2011). Turkish primary school students’ conceptions about the particulate nature of matter. Internationa Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 6, 99-121. [62] Pabu?cu, A., & Geban, ?. (2006). Remediating misconceptions concerning chemical bonding through conceptual change text. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30, 184-192. [63] Papageorgiou, G., & Sakka, D. (2000). Primary school teschers’ views of fundamental chemical concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1, 237-247. doi:10.1039/a9rp90025j [64] Petru?evski, V. M., Monkovi?, M., & ?optrajanov, B. (2007). Demonstrations as a tool for ironing-out preconceptions: 1. On the reactions of alkali metal sulfates with concentrated sulfuric acid. The Chemical Educator, 12, 1-4. [65] Petru?evski, V. M., Taseska, M., & Monkovi?, M. (2006). Demonstrations as a tool for ironing-out misconceptions: 2. Can a strong acid be displaced by a weak one? The Chemical Education Journal, 9. [66] Regan, A., Childs, P., & Hayes, S. (2011). The use of an intervention programme to improve undergraduate students’ chemical knowledge and address their misconceptions, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 219-227. doi:10.1039/c1rp90027g [67] Roschelle, J. (1995). Learning in interactive environments: Prior knowl [68] edge and new experience. In: J. H. Falk, & L. D. Dierking (Eds.), Public institutions for personal learning: Establishing a research agenda (pp. 37-51). Washington DC: American Association of Museums. [69] Salame, I. I., Sarowar, S., Begum, S., & Krauss, D. (2011). Students’ alternative conceptions about atomic properties and the periodic table. The Chemical Educator, 16, 190-194. [70] Schmidt, H., Baumg?rtner, T., & Eybe, H. (2003). Changing ideas about the periodic table of elements and students’ alternative conceptions of isotopes and allotropes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 257-277. doi:10.1002/tea.10076 [71] Silberberg, M. S. (2006). Chemistry. The molecular nature of matter and change (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. [72] Singh, P. (2008). The unexpected reward of qualitative research in assessment: A case example. The Qualitative Report, 13, 278-300. [73] Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4, 2-20. [74] Skamp, K. (2009). Atoms and molecules in primary science: What are teachers to do? Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 69, 5- 10. [75] ?optrajanov, B. (2002a). Chemistry for the 1st year of reformed gymnasium education. Skopje: Prosvetno Delo (in Macedonian). [76] ?optrajanov, B. (2002b). Chemistry for the 2nd year of reformed gymnasium education. Skopje: Prosvetno Delo (in Macedonian). [77] S?zbilir, M., P?narba??, T., & Canpolat, N. (2010). Prospective chemistry teachers’ conceptions of chemical thermodynamics and kinetics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6, 111-121. [78] Stojanovska, M. I., Petru?evski, V. M., & ?optrajanov, B. T. (2012a). On the existence of hydrogen salts of monoprotic acids. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 1168-1170. doi:10.1021/ed2005483 [79] Stojanovska, M., Petru?evski, V. M., & ?optrajanov, B. (2012b). The concept of sublimation—Iodine as an example. Educatión Quimica, 23, 171. [80] Taber, K. (2001). Building the structural concepts of chemistry: Some considerations from educational research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 2, 123-158. doi:10.1039/b1rp90014e [81] Taber, K. S. (2011). Models, molecules and misconceptions: A commentary on “Secondary school students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding”. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8, 3-18. [82] Tasker, R. (1998). The VisChem project: Molecular level animations in chemistry—Potential and caution. UniServe Science News, 9, 12-16. [83] Tatar, E. (2011). Prospective primary school teachers’ misconceptions about states of matter. Educational Research and Reviews, 6, 197- 200. [84] The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (1998). URL (last checked 2 July 2012). http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1998/ [85] Treagust, D. F., Chandrasesaran, A. L., Zain, A. N. M., Ong, E. T., Karpudewan, M., & Halim, L. (2011). Evaluation of an intervention instructional program to facilitate understanding of basic particle concepts among students enrolled in several levels of study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 251-261. doi:10.1039/c1rp90030g [86] Wenning, C. J. (2008). Dealing more effectively with alternative conceptions in science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 5, 11-19. [87] Yezierski, E. J., & Birk, J. P. (2006). Misconceptions about the particulate nature of matter. Using animations to close the gender gap. Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 954-960. doi:10.1021/ed083p954