[1] Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
[2] Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(94)90037-X
[3] Gustafson, J., Hodgson, V., & Tickner, S. (2004). Identity construction and dialogue genres—How notions of dialogue may influence social presence in networked learning environments. Proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on Networked Learning, Lancaster, 5-7 April 2004.
[4] Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning to mean—Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.
[5] Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Education and Lifelong Learning.
[6] Hatch, E. (1992). Discourse and language education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[7] Howatt, A. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: OUP.
[8] Kember, D. (1996). The intention to both memorise and understand: Another approach to learning. Higher Education, 31, 341-354. doi:10.1007/BF00128436
[9] Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and quality of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x
[10] Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London: Pergamon Press Inc.
[11] Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34-46. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
[12] Lewis, D., & Allan, B. (2005). Virtual learning communities: A guide to practitioners. Berkshire: McGraw Hill.
[13] Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning II: Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115-127. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x
[14] Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1, 82-93.
[15] Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer, & R. Kern, (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[16] Peters, K. (2000). Concrete steps for on-line discussion. URL (last checked 19 September 2000). http://booboo.webct.com/otln/Asynchronous_Strategies.htm
[17] Prawat, R. S. (1996). Constructivisms: Modern and postmodern. Educational Psychologist, 31, 215-225.
[18] Schmidt, R. W. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness: In search of useful definitions for Applied Linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.
[19] Stevick, E. W. (1976). Memory, meaning and method. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
[20] Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London: Longman.
[21] Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[22] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[23] Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching. Tokyo: Logos International.
[24] Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1037/11193-000