PSYCH  Vol.3 No.9 , September 2012
Spatial Negative Priming, but Not Inhibition of Return, with Central (Foveal) Displays
ABSTRACT
The view persists that the inhibition of return (IOR) and the spatial negative priming (SNP) phenomena may be produced by a common “orientation inhibition” mechanism (e.g., Christie & Klein, 2001), held to arise during the processing of peripherally delivered (parafoveal) visual events. Both IOR and SNP effects are present when responding to recently to-be-ignored distractor events is delayed. Since an SNP effect has been produced using centrally located distracters (visual angle of about 2.5? or less), a common mechanism view would require that these locations generate orientation inhibition, which then cause of the SNP effect. We report past results and an experiment that reject the common mechanism view. Subjects completed four tasks; two, 1-response tasks, using either central (Task 1) or peripheral (Task 2: IOR) event locations, and two, 4-response tasks, again, using central (Task 3: SNP-central) or peripheral (Task 4: SNP-peripheral) locations. Trials occurred in pairs; first the prime (a target or a distractor), then the probe (target only). Critically, neither distractor- nor target-occupied prime locations produced either inhibitory (SNP effect) or positive after-effects, respectively, in Task 1. Seemingly, centrally located events do not generate orientation inhibition and so, unlike the IOR effect, this inhibition does not cause the SNP-central phenomenon.

Cite this paper
Buckolz, E. , Fitzgeorge, L. & Knowles, S. (2012). Spatial Negative Priming, but Not Inhibition of Return, with Central (Foveal) Displays. Psychology, 3, 666-674. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.39101.
References
[1]   Bodner, G. E., & Mulji, R. (2010). Prime proportion affects masked priming of fixed and free-choice responses. Experimental Psychology, 67, 360-366.

[2]   Buckolz, E., Avramidis, C., & Fitzgeorge, L. (2008). Prime-trial demands and their impact on distractor processing in a spatial negative priming task. Psychological Research, 72, 235-248.doi:10.1007/s00426-007-0107-5

[3]   Buckolz, E., Boulougouris, A., & Khan, M. (2002). The influence of probe-trial selection requirements on the location negative priming effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 2774-283.doi:10.1037/h0087403

[4]   Buckolz, E., Goldfarb, A., & Khan, M. (2004). The use of a distractor-assigned response slows later responding in a location negative priming task. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 837-845.doi:10.3758/BF03194977

[5]   Buckolz, E., Kajaste, B., Lok, M., Edgar, C., & Khan, M. (2011). Do centrally presented stimulations cause orientation inhibition? Presented to the North American Society for Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity. Burlington, Vermont.

[6]   Chao, H. F. (2009). Revisiting the role of probe distracters in negative priming: Location negative priming is observed when probe distracters are consistently absent. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1072-1082. doi:10.3758/APP.71.5.1072

[7]   Christie, J., & Klein, R. (2001). Negative priming for spatial location? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 24-38. doi:10.1037/h0087350

[8]   Connelly, S. L., & Hasher, L. (1993). Aging and the inhibition of spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1238-1250.doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.6.1238

[9]   Corneil, B. D., Munoz, D. P., Chapman, B. B., Admans, T., & Cushing, S. L. (2007). Neuromuscular consequences of reflexive covert orienting. Nature Neuroscience, 155, 13-15.

[10]   Coward, R. S., Poliakoff, E., O’Boyle, D. J., & Lowe, C. L. (2004). The contribution of non-ocular response inhibition to visual inhibition of return. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 124-128.doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1803-z

[11]   Edgar, C. (2011). Preventing response-based inhibition processing retrieval: SNP disengagement. Masters Thesis, London: The University of Western Ontario.

[12]   Fitzgeorge, L. (2009). Cognitive inhibition: Inhibitory after-effects. Doctoral Thesis, London: The University of Western Ontario.

[13]   Fitzgeorge, L., & Buckolz, E. (2008). Spatial negative priming modulation: The influence of probetrial target cueing, distractor presence and an intervening response. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 994-1026. doi:10.1080/09541440701686250

[14]   Fitzgeorge, L., & Buckolz, E. (2009). Automatic versus volitional orienting and the production of the inhibition-of-return effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 94-102. doi:10.1037/a0013700

[15]   Fitzgeorge, L., Buckolz, E., & Khan, M. (2011). Recently inhibited responses are avoided for both masked and non-masked primes in a spatial negative priming task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1435-1452. doi:10.3758/s1341-011-0125-7

[16]   Guy, S., & Buckolz, E. (2007). The locus and modulation of the location negative priming effect. Psychological Research, 71, 178-191.doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0003-9

[17]   Guy, S., Buckolz, E., & Fitzgeorge, L. (2007). Disengaging the location negative priming effect: The influence of an intervening response. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 789-812.doi:10.1080/09541440600959287

[18]   Guy, S., Buckolz, E., & Khan, M. (2006). The locus of location repetition latency effects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 307-318. doi:10.1037/cjep2006028

[19]   Guy, S., Buckolz, E., & Pratt, J. (2004). The influence of distractor- only prime trials on the location negative priming mechanism. Experimental Psychology, 51, 4-14. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.51.1.4

[20]   Hommel, B. (1993). The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 55, 208-222. doi:10.1007/BF00419608

[21]   Klein, R., Christie, J., & Morris, E. P. (2005). Vector averaging of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 295-300.doi:10.3758/BF03196375

[22]   Lupianez, J., Klein, R., & Bartolomeo, P. (2006). Inhibition of return: Twenty years after. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1003-1014.doi:10.1080/02643290600588095

[23]   Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., & Lupianez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1289-1296. doi:10.3758/BF03212130

[24]   Mulckhuyse, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Unconscious attentional orienting to exogenous cues: A review of the literature. Acta Psychologica, 134, 200-309. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.002

[25]   Neill, W. T., Terry, K. M., & Valdes, L. A. (1994). Negative priming without probe selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 119- 121. doi:10.3758/BF03200767

[26]   O’Connor, P. A., & Neill, W. T. (2010). Does subliminal priming of free response choices depend on taskset or automatic response activation? Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 280-287. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.08.007

[27]   Perry, J. (2011). An investigation of masked priming mechanisms in binary classification tasks. Ph.D. Thesis, London: The University of Western Ontario.

[28]   Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma, & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Assoc.

[29]   Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228. doi:10.1080/02643298508252866

[30]   Proctor, R. W., & Lu, C-H. (1994). Referential coding and attention-shifting accounts of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 56, 185-195. doi:10.1007/BF00419706

[31]   Possami, C.-A. (1986). Relationship between inhibition and facilitation following a visual cue. Acta Psychologica, 61, 243-258. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(86)90084-3

[32]   Rafal, R., Calabresi, P., Brennan, C., & Sciolto, T. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 673-685. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.4.673

[33]   Rafal, R., Davies, J., & Lauder, J. (2006). Inhibitory tagging at subsequently fixated locations: Generation of “inhibition of return” without saccade inhibition. Visual Cognition, 13, 308-323.doi:10.1080/13506280544000011

[34]   Schlaghecken, F., Rowley, L., Sembi, S., Simmons, R., & Whitcomb, D. (2007). The negative compatibility effect: A case for self-inhibition. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 227-240.doi:10.2478/v10053-008-0027-y

[35]   Sumner, P. (2007). Negative and positive masked-priming—Implications for motor inhibition. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 317- 326. doi:10.2478/v10053-008-0033-0

[36]   Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (1987). Distribution in the visual field of he cost of voluntarily allocated attention and the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting. Neuropsychologia, 25, 55-71.

[37]   Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 492-504. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.492

[38]   Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Cameron, S., Brehaut, J., & Bastedo, J. (1991). Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks; Time course and disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 681-692.doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.4.681

[39]   Verhaeghen, P., & De Meersman, L. (1998). Aging and the negative priming effect: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 13, 435-444.doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.3.435

[40]   Wang, H., & Proctor, R. W. (1996). Stimulus-response compatibility as a function of stimulus code and response modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1201-11217. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.5.1201

[41]   Welsh, T. N., & Pratt, J. (2006). Inhibition of return in cue-target and target-target tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 167-175.doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0433-7

 
 
Top