ABSTRACT Objective: The structural anisotropy of articular cartilage controls its deformation response. As proteoglycans and collagen vary with depth, simple uniaxial compression results in inhomogeneous deformation with distinct depth-dependent mechanical properties. Investigations into depth-dependent mechanical properties of articular cartilage have previously required tissue modification after specimen isolation. Such modifications include histological processes, freezing, subchondral bone removal, and fluorescent staining that may alter the tissue, limiting in vivo applicability. Design: Using a custom tissue-sectioning device, 0.1 mm thick unfixed, unstained, osetochondral samples were obtained. A customized apparatus loaded samples to 12.5%, 24%, and 29% compression in under a microscope with 10× magnification. Equilibrium load was measured after stress relaxation. Intra-tissue displacement was measured by tracing groups of cells between the different compression levels using a digital imaging program. Cell distance from the subchondral bone was measured to identify intratissue displacement and calculate strain. Results: The results reveal that stress levels and intratissue displacement increased with greater tissue compression (p < 0.05). Intra-tissue displacement decreased as depth from the articular surface increased (p < 0.01). This occurred for each level of tissue compression. Overall compressive resistance is seen to increase with depth from the articular surface. Conclusions: The current study identifies a method directly visualising and assessing the depth-dependent structural response to compression. The ability to avoid tissue modification after specimen isolation, allows this procedure to more closely approximate in vivo conditions and may provide an important method for analyzing the coordinated changes in cartilage composition and function due to ageing and disease.
Cite this paper
M. Szarko and Y. Xia, "Direct Visualisation of the Depth-Dependent Mechanical Properties of Full-Thickness Articular Cartilage," Open Journal of Orthopedics, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2012, pp. 34-39. doi: 10.4236/ojo.2012.22007.
 A. Maroudas, “Physico-Chemical Properties of Articular Cartilage,” In: M. A. S. Freeman, Ed., Adult Articular Cartilage, Pitman Medical, Tunbridge Wells, 1979, pp. 215-290.
 Y. Xia, N. Ramakrishnan and A. Bidtha-napally, “The Depth-Dependent Anisotropy of Articular Cartilage by Fourier-Transform Infrared Imaging (FTI-RI),” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, Vol. 15, No. 7, 2007, pp. 780-788. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2007.01.007
 J. M. Clark, “The Organisation of Collagen Fibrils in the Superficial Zones of Articular Cartilage,” Journal of Anatomy, Vol. 171, 1990, pp. 117-130.
 E. R. Myers and V. C. Mow, “Biomechanics of Cartilage and Its Response to Biomechanical Stimuli,” In: B. K. Hall, Ed., Cartilage: Structure, Function, and Biochemistry, Academic Press, Toronto, 1983, pp. 313-341.
 W. C. Bae, C. W. Lewis, M. E. Levenstonand R. L. Sah, “Indentation Testing of Human Articular Cartilage: Effects of Probe Tip Geometry and Indentation Depth on Intra-Tissue Strain,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1039-1047.
 S. S. Chen, Y. H Falcovitz, R. Schneiderman, A. Maroudas and R. L. Sah, “Depth-Dependent Compressive Properties of Normal Aged Human Femoral Head Articular Cartilage: Relationship to Fixed Charge Density,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2001, pp. 561-569. doi:10.1053/joca.2001.0424
 D. M. Gore, G. R Hig-ginson and R. J. Minns, “Compliance of Articular Carti-lage and Its Variation through the Thickness,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1983, pp. 233-247. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/28/3/004
 T. J. Klein, M. Chaudhry, W. C. Bae and R. L. Sah, “Depth-Dependent Biomechanical and Biochemical Properties of Fetal, Newborn, and Tissue-Engineered Articular Cartilage,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2007, pp. 82-190. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.11.002
 P. O’Connor, C. R. Orford and D. L. Gardner, “Differential Response to Compressive Loads of Zones of Canine Hya-line Articular Cartilage: Micromechanical, Light and Electron Microscopic Studies,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Vol. 47, No. 5, 1988, pp. 414-420.
 R. M. Schinagl, M. K. Ting, J. H. Price and R. L. Sah, “Video Microscopy to Quantitate the Inhomogeneous Equilibrium Strain within Articular Cartilage during Confined Compression,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1996, pp. 500-512.
 R. M. Schinagl, D. Gurskis, A. C. Chen and R. L. Sah, “Depth-Dependent Confined Compression Modulus of Full-Thickness Bovine Articular Cartilage,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, Vol. 115, No. 4, 1997, pp. 499- 506. doi:10.1002/jor.1100150404
 C. C. B. Wang, J. M. Deng, G. A. Ateshian and C. T. Hung, “An Automated Approach for Direct Measurement of Two-Dimensional Strain Distributions within Articular Cartilage under Unconfined Compression,” Journal of Biomechanical Engi-neering, Vol. 124, No. 5, 2002, pp. 557-567. doi:10.1115/1.1503795
 A. C. Chen, S. M. Klisch, W. C. Bae, M. M. Temple, K. B. McGowan, K. R. Gratz, B. L. Schumacher and R. L. Sah, “Mechanical Characterization of Native and Tissue Engineered Cartilage,” In: M. Sabatini, F. DeCeuninck and P. Pastoureau, Eds., Cartilage and Osteoarthritis, Humana Press, Totowa, 2004, pp. 157-190.