Back
 AJAC  Vol.3 No.6 , June 2012
Determination and Validation of Markers for Heat-Induced Damage in Wool Proteins
Abstract: Protein-based animal fibres of commercial importance are frequently exposed to elevated temperatures during processing treatments. Hydrothermal processes cause protein deterioration, impacting negatively on the value or condition of these materials. This study was designed to investigate hydrothermal damage in wool proteins at the molecular level. The effect of hydrothermal damage on Type I and II intermediate filament proteins (keratins) extracted from wool was characterised using advanced quantitative techniques based on isobaric iTRAQ labelling and mass spectrometry. Many native peptides were observed to be degraded and modified. Amongst these, twenty keratin peptides were observed to consistently degrade during hydrothermal exposure. These peptides acted as molecular markers of damage – specific indicators of the extent of heat-induced protein damage. This technology will be of value in assessing the severity of damage imparted after high temperature exposure of protein-based animal fibres such as wool and cashmere during processes such as dyeing and carbonising, or even after high temperature human hair treatments. The identification of molecular damage markers identified within wool and other materials provides a new route to sensitive and specific evaluation of the effects of protein deterioration. It is anticipated that the utilisation of such markers will facilitate the development of targeted approaches to minimising processing damage to high-value fibres and protein-based biomaterials.
Cite this paper: A. Grosvenor, J. Morton and J. Dyer, "Determination and Validation of Markers for Heat-Induced Damage in Wool Proteins," American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 3 No. 6, 2012, pp. 431-436. doi: 10.4236/ajac.2012.36056.
References

[1]   F. G. France and I. L. Weatherall, “The Effect of Light on Wool,” Proceedings of the 9th International Wool Textile Research Conference, Biella, Italy, 28 June 1995, Vol. 2, pp. 100-108.

[2]   K. R. Millington, “Photoyellowing of Wool. Part 2: Photo- yellowing Mechanisms and Methods of Prevention,” Coloration Technology, Vol. 122, No. 6, 2006, pp. 301- 316. doi:10.1111/j.1478-4408.2006.00045.x

[3]   M. J. Davies, “The Oxidative Environment and Protein Damage,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Proteins & Proteomics, Vol. 1703, No. 2, 2005, pp. 93-109. doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2004.08.007

[4]   S. Guedes, R. Vitorino, R. Domingues, F. Amado and P. Domingues, “Oxidation of Bovine Serum Albumin: Identification of Oxidation Products and Structural Modifications,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, Vol. 23, No. 15, 2009, pp. 2307-2315. doi:10.1002/rcm.4149

[5]   J. M. Dyer, S. D. Bringans and W. G. Bryson, “Characterisation of Photo-Oxidation Products within Photoyellowed Wool Proteins: Tryptophan and Tyrosine Derived Chromophores,” Photochemical and Photobiological Science, Vol. 5, No. 7, 2006, pp. 698-706. doi:10.1039/b603030k

[6]   J. M. Dyer, S. D. Bringans and W. G. Bryson, “Determination of Photo-Oxidation Products within Photoyellowed Bleached Wool Proteins,” Photochemistry and Photobiology, Vol. 82, No. 2, 2006, pp. 551-557. doi:10.1562/2005-08-29-RA-663

[7]   J. M. Dyer, S. Clerens, C. D. Cornellison, C. J. Murphy, G. Maurdev and K. R. Millington, “Photoproducts Formed in the Photoyellowing of Collagen in the Presence of a Fluorescent Whitening Agent,” Pho-tochemistry and Photobiology, Vol. 85, No. 6, 2009, pp. 1314-1321. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2009.00614.x

[8]   J. M. Dyer, J. E. Plowman, G. Krsinic, S. Deb-Choudhury, H. Koehn, K. R. Millington and S. Clerens, “Proteomic Evaluation and Location of UVB-Induced Photomodification in Wool,” Photochemistry and Photobiology: B Biology, Vol. 98, 2010, pp. 118-127.

[9]   A. J. Grosvenor, J. D. Morton and J. M. Dyer, “Proteomic Characterisation of Hydrothermal Redox Damage,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Vol. 91, No. 15, 2010, pp. 2806-2813. doi:10.1002/jsfa.4525

[10]   A. J. Gros-venor, J. D. Morton and J. M. Dyer, “Profiling of Residue-Level Photo-Oxidative Damage in Peptides,” Amino Acids, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2009, pp. 285-296. doi:10.1007/s00726-009-0440-7

[11]   A. J. Grosvenor, J. D. Morton and J. M. Dyer, “Isobaric Labelling Approach to the Tracking and Relative Quantitation of Peptide Damage at the Primary Structural Level,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Vol. 58, No. 24, 2010, pp. 12672-12677. doi:10.1021/jf103309b

[12]   M. Bide, “Wool Dyeing: What’s New?” Process Improvement, Vol. 24, 1992, pp. 17-22.

[13]   W. S. Simpson, “Prevention of Dyebath Yellowing,” In: W. S. Simpson and G. H. Crawshaw, Eds., Wool: Science and Technology, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, 2002, pp. 216-217.

[14]   P. L. Ross, Y. N. Huang, J. N. Marchese, B. Williamson, K. Parker, S. Hattan, N. Khainovski, S. Pillai, S. Dey, S. Daniels, S. Purkayastha, P. Juhasz, S. Martin, M. Bartlet-Jones, F. He, A. Jacobson and D. J. Pappin, “Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Using Amine-Reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents,” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Vol. 3, 2004, pp. 1154-1169. doi:10.1074/mcp.M400129-MCP200

[15]   H. Thomas, A. Conrads, K. H. Phan, M. van de L?cht and H. Zahn, “In Vitro Reconstitution of Wool Intermediate Filaments,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Vol. 8, No. 5, 1986, pp. 258-264. doi:10.1016/0141-8130(86)90038-3

 
 
Top