F. Zijlstra, P. Fioretti, J. H. C. Reiber, et al., “Which Cineangiographically Assessed Anatomic Variable Correlates Best with Functional Measurements of Stenosis Severity? A Comparison of Quantitative Analysis of the Coronary Cineangiogram with Measured Coronary Flow Reserve and Exercise/Redistribution Thallium-201 Scintigraphy,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1988, pp. 686-691.
 J. H. O’Keefe Jr., C. S. Barnhart and T. M. Bateman, “Comparison of Stress Echocardiography and Stress Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy for Diagnosing Coronary Artery Disease and Assessing Its Severity,” The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 75, No. 11, 1995, pp. 25D-34D.
 D. S. Berman, G. Germano and L. J. Shaw. “The Role of Nuclear Cardiology in Clinical Decision Making,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1999, pp. 280297. doi:10.1016/S0001-2998(99)80017-8
 L. D. Metz, M. Beattie, R. Hom, R. F. Redberg, D. Grady and K. E. Fleischmann. “The Prognostic Value of Normal Exercise Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Exercise Echocardiography: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2007, pp. 227-237. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.048
 T. H. Schindler, H. R. Schelbert, A. Quercioli and V. Dilsizian, “Cardiac PET Imaging for the Detection and Monitoring of Coronary Artery Disease and Microvascular Health,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, Vol. 3, No. 6, 2010, pp. 623-640. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.04.007
 R. T. Go, T. H. Marwick, W. J. MacIntyre, et al., “A Prospective Comparison of Rubidium-82 PET and Thallium-201 SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Utilizing a Single Dipyridamole Stress in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 12, 1990, pp. 1899-1905.
 R. E. Stewart, M. Schwaiger, E. Molina, et al., “Comparison of Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography and Thallium-201 SPECT Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease,” The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 67, No. 16, 1991, pp. 1303-1310. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(91)90456-U
 T. M. Bateman, G. V. Heller, A. I. McGhie, et al., “Diagnostic Accuracy of Rest/Stress ECG-Gated Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET: Comparison with ECG-Gated Tc-99m Sestamibi SPECT,” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2006, pp. 24-33. doi:10.1016/j.nuclcard.2005.12.004
 M. Naya and M. F. Di Carli, “Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT to Evaluate Known and Suspected Coronary Artery Disease,” The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Vol. 54, No. 2, 2010, pp. 145-156.
 G. D. Hutchins, M. Schwaiger, K. C. Rosenspire, J. Krivokapich, H. Schelbert and D. E. Kuhl, “Noninvasive Quantification of Regional Blood Flow in the Human Heart Using N-13 Ammonia and Dynamic Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1990, pp. 10321042. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(90)90237-J
 N. Tamaki, T. D. Ruddy and R. Dekamp, “Myocardial Perfusion,” In: R. L. Wahl and J. W. Buchanan, Ed., Principles and Practice of Positron Emission Tomography, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2002, pp. 320-333.
 K. Yoshinaga, B. J. Chow, K. Williams, et al., “What is the Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography?” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 48, No. 5, 2006, pp. 1029-1039.
 S. Dorbala, R. Hachamovitch, R. Kwong, Z. Curillova and M. F. Di Carli, “Incremental Prognostic Value of Rubidium-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET-CT Imaging in Patients with Known or Suspected CAD,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 49, 2007, p. 109.